5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis on cardiac MRI in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a systematic review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Background

          The use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (c-MRI) in risk stratification for clinical outcomes of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) remains low.

          Objectives

          This systematic review investigated the prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on c-MRI in patients with ICM for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, sudden cardiac death (SCD), or all-cause mortality.

          Methods

          We conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases Pubmed and Embase for relevant prospective English-language studies published between January 1990 and February 2019. All included articles were prospective studies that comprised of human participants greater than 18 years old with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and a primary or secondary prevention ICD, had a sample size >30 participants, had at least 6 months follow-up, and reported on ventricular tachyarrhythmia, SCD and all-cause mortality. A total of 90 articles related to ICM were identified and were subsequently screened independently by two authors. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of LGE were calculated using random-effects model.

          Results

          Eight studies with 1085 participants were included in the final analysis. The mean age of patients varied from 43–83 years, with most patients being men. The most common comorbidities reported included history of diabetes mellitus (22–62%), hyperlipidemia (40–86%), and hypertension (35–88%). The ejection fraction of each study was reported as mean or median, and varied from 22–35%. During a follow-up that ranged from 8.5 to 65 months, there were 110 ventricular arrhythmic events reported. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of LGE for ICD therapy delivered for ventricular arrhythmias were 0.79 (95% Cl: 0.66–0.87) and 0.28 (95% Cl: 0.14–0.46) respectively. For all-cause mortality, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of LGE were 0.76 (95% Cl: 0.40–0.93) and 0.41 (95% Cl: 0.14–0.75) respectively. While SCD was of significant interest to our review, only one of the studies reported on the association between LGE and SCD leading to the subsequent exclusion of SCD from the endpoint analysis.

          Conclusion

          LGE has high prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with ICM and may provide helpful information for clinical decision-making related to SCD prevention. Our findings illustrate how LGE may improve current risk stratification, prognostication and selection of patients with ICM for ICD therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator.

            The implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves survival in high-risk cardiac patients. This analysis from the MADIT-II trial database examines the long-term clinical course and subsequent mortality risk of patients after termination of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias by an ICD. Life-table survival analysis was performed, and proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of baseline clinical factors and time-dependent defibrillator therapy to mortality during long-term follow-up. Of 720 patients with an ICD (average follow-up 21 months), 169 patients received 701 antiarrhythmic device therapies for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Few baseline characteristics distinguished patients who received appropriate ICD therapy for their first ventricular tachyarrhythmic episode. The probability of survival for at least 1 year after first therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 80%. The hazard ratios for the risk of death due to any cause in those who survived appropriate therapy for termination of VT and VF were 3.4 (P<0.001) and 3.3 (P=0.01), respectively, compared with those who survived without receiving ICD therapy, with a high frequency of heart failure and late nonsudden cardiac death after first successful ICD therapy for VF. Successful appropriate therapy by an ICD for VT or VF is associated with 80% survival at 1 year after arrhythmia termination. These patients are at increased risk for heart failure and nonsudden cardiac death after device termination of VT or VF and should receive special attention for the prevention and management of progressive left ventricular dysfunction during long-term follow-up.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Myocardial fibrosis predicts appropriate device therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

              The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between regional myocardial fibrosis and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiomyopathy. Patients with heart failure are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) devices for a subgroup based on impaired left ventricular function. A significant proportion of devices never discharge, hence a more accurate method for targeting those at risk is desirable. We prospectively enrolled 103 patients meeting criteria for ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed before device implantation. Regional fibrosis was identified with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Median follow-up was 573 days (interquartile range: 379 to 863 days). The LGE identified regional fibrosis in 31 of 61 (51%) patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and in all 42 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). There was a 29% (9 of 31) discharge rate in the NICM group with LGE compared with a 14% (6 of 42) discharge rate in the ICM group (p = NS). There were no ICD discharges in the NICM group without LGE, which was significantly lower than the rate observed in both the ICM patients (p = 0.04) and the NICM patients with LGE (p < 0.01). Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in patients with and without device therapy (24 ± 12% vs. 26 ± 8%, p = NS) and those with or without LGE (25 ± 9% vs. 26 ± 9%, p = NS). Patients with advanced cardiomyopathy and myocardial fibrosis demonstrated by LGE on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have a high likelihood of appropriate ICD therapy. Correspondingly, absence of LGE may indicate a lower risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Am Heart J
                Am. Heart J
                American Heart Journal
                Elsevier Inc.
                0002-8703
                1097-6744
                11 August 2020
                11 August 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
                [b ]Division of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
                [c ]Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
                Author notes
                [* ]Reprint requests: Godefroy Chery, MD, 4220 N. Roxboro Road, Durham, NC 27704. Godefroy.chery@ 123456duke.edu Godefroy.chery@ 123456dm.duke.edu
                Article
                S0002-8703(20)30227-1
                10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.004
                7417269
                32916608
                60c75a7c-5beb-4cbb-8661-58c207aebdd1
                © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 13 October 2019
                : 3 August 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Cardiovascular Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article