17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Splicing-Dependent Transcriptional Checkpoint Associated with Prespliceosome Formation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          There is good evidence for functional interactions between splicing and transcription in eukaryotes, but how and why these processes are coupled remain unknown. Prp5 protein (Prp5p) is an RNA-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) required for prespliceosome formation in yeast. We demonstrate through in vivo RNA labeling that, in addition to a splicing defect, the prp5-1 mutation causes a defect in the transcription of intron-containing genes. We present chromatin immunoprecipitation evidence for a transcriptional elongation defect in which RNA polymerase that is phosphorylated at Ser5 of the largest subunit’s heptad repeat accumulates over introns and that this defect requires Cus2 protein. A similar accumulation of polymerase was observed when prespliceosome formation was blocked by a mutation in U2 snRNA. These results indicate the existence of a transcriptional elongation checkpoint that is associated with prespliceosome formation during cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly. We propose a role for Cus2p as a potential checkpoint factor in transcription.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Transcriptional elongation is inhibited when prespliceosome formation is blocked

          • The defect is characterized by RNA polymerase accumulation on introns

          • This checkpoint can be triggered by mutations in either PRP5 or U2 snRNA

          • The U2-associated Cus2 protein is a candidate checkpoint factor

          Abstract

          In eukaryotes, transcription and splicing are functionally linked, but how or why this happens is unknown. Chathoth et al. show that, in budding yeast, these processes are coupled by one or more transcriptional checkpoints associated with surveillance of the splicing machinery as it assembles cotranscriptionally on nascent transcripts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Alternative splicing: a pivotal step between eukaryotic transcription and translation.

          Alternative splicing was discovered simultaneously with splicing over three decades ago. Since then, an enormous body of evidence has demonstrated the prevalence of alternative splicing in multicellular eukaryotes, its key roles in determining tissue- and species-specific differentiation patterns, the multiple post- and co-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that control it, and its causal role in hereditary disease and cancer. The emerging evidence places alternative splicing in a central position in the flow of eukaryotic genetic information, between transcription and translation, in that it can respond not only to various signalling pathways that target the splicing machinery but also to transcription factors and chromatin structure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Different phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II and associated mRNA processing factors during transcription.

            The activities of several mRNA processing factors are coupled to transcription through binding to RNA polymerase II (Pol II). The largest subunit of Pol II contains a repetitive carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) that becomes highly phosphorylated during transcription. mRNA-capping enzyme binds only to phosphorylated CTD, whereas other processing factors may bind to both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms. Capping occurs soon after transcription initiation and before other processing events, raising the question of whether capping components remain associated with the transcription complex after they have modified the 5' end of the mRNA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae shows that capping enzyme cross-links to promoters but not coding regions. In contrast, the mRNA cap methyltransferase and the Hrp1/CFIB polyadenylation factor cross-link to both promoter and coding regions. Remarkably, the phosphorylation pattern of the CTD changes during transcription. Ser 5 phosphorylation is detected primarily at promoter regions dependent on TFIIH. In contrast, Ser 2 phosphorylation is seen only in coding regions. These results suggest a dynamic association of mRNA processing factors with differently modified forms of the polymerase throughout the transcription cycle.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rates of in situ transcription and splicing in large human genes

              Transcription and splicing must proceed over genomic distances of hundreds of kilobases in many human genes. However, the rates and mechanisms of these processes are poorly understood. We have used the compound 5,6-Dichlorobenzimidazole 1-b-D-ribofuranoside (DRB) that reversibly blocks gene transcription in vivo combined with quantitative RT-PCR to analyze the transcription and RNA processing of several long human genes. We found that the rate of RNA polymerase II transcription over long genomic distances is about 3.8 kb per minute and is nearly the same whether transcribing long introns or exon rich regions. We also determined that co-transcriptional pre-mRNA splicing of U2-dependent introns occurs within 5–10 minutes of synthesis irrespective of intron length between 1 kb and 240 kb. Similarly, U12-dependent introns were co-transcriptionally spliced within 10 minutes of synthesis confirming that these introns are spliced within the nuclear compartment. These results show that the expression of large genes is surprisingly rapid and efficient.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mol Cell
                Mol. Cell
                Molecular Cell
                Cell Press
                1097-2765
                1097-4164
                06 March 2014
                06 March 2014
                : 53
                : 5
                : 779-790
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author jbeggs@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                Article
                S1097-2765(14)00078-1
                10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.017
                3988880
                24560925
                6157070b-84d0-4197-a1fe-e28c6ec4bbca
                © 2014 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 19 August 2013
                : 26 November 2013
                : 17 January 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article