6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          An adequate number of prenatal consultations is beneficial to the health of the mother and fetus. Guidelines recommend an average of 5–14 consultations. Daily practice, however, shows that some women attend the midwifery practice more frequently. This study examined factors associated with frequent attendance in midwifery-led care.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large midwifery practice in the Netherlands among low-risk women who started prenatal care in 2015 and 2016. Based on Andersen’s behavioral model, we collected data on potential determinants from the digital midwifery’s practice database. Prenatal healthcare utilization was measured by a revised version of the Kotelchuck Index, which measures a combination of care entry and numbers of visits. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the likelihood of frequent attendance compared to the recommended number of visits, adjusted for all relevant factors. Separate models were fitted on the non-referred and the referred group of obstetric-led care, as referral was found to be an effect modifier.

          Results

          The prevalence of frequent attendance was 23% (243/1053), mainly caused by worries and/or vague complaints (44%; 106/243). Among non-referred women, 53% (560/1053), frequent attendance was associated with consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 3.99 (2.35–6.77)) and exposure to sexual violence (OR = 2.17 (1.11–4.24)). Among the referred participants, 47% (493/1053), frequent attendance was associated with a consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 2.75 (1.66–4.57)), psychosocial problems in the past or present (OR = 1.85 (1.02–3.35) or OR = 2.99 (1.43–6.25)), overweight (OR = 1.88 (1.09–3.24)), and deprived area (OR = 0.50 (0.27–0.92)).

          Conclusion

          Our exploratory study indicates that the determinants of frequent attendance in midwifery-led care differs between non-referred and referred women. Underlying causes for frequent attendance was mainly because of non-medical reasons. Implication for practice : A trustful midwife-client relationship is known to be needed for clients such as frequent attenders to share more detailed, personal stories in case of vague complaints or worries, which is necessary to identify their implicit needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice.

          To briefly review results of the latest research on the contributions of depression, anxiety, and stress exposures in pregnancy to adverse maternal and child outcomes, and to direct attention to new findings on pregnancy anxiety, a potent maternal risk factor. Anxiety, depression, and stress in pregnancy are risk factors for adverse outcomes for mothers and children. Anxiety in pregnancy is associated with shorter gestation and has adverse implications for fetal neurodevelopment and child outcomes. Anxiety about a particular pregnancy is especially potent. Chronic strain, exposure to racism, and depressive symptoms in mothers during pregnancy are associated with lower birth weight infants with consequences for infant development. These distinguishable risk factors and related pathways to distinct birth outcomes merit further investigation. This body of evidence, and the developing consensus regarding biological and behavioral mechanisms, sets the stage for a next era of psychiatric and collaborative interdisciplinary research on pregnancy to reduce the burden of maternal stress, depression, and anxiety in the perinatal period. It is critical to identify the signs, symptoms, and diagnostic thresholds that warrant prenatal intervention and to develop efficient, effective and ecologically valid screening and intervention strategies to be used widely.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

            The assessment of the adequacy of prenatal care utilization is heavily shaped by the way in which utilization is measured. Although it is widely used, the current major index of utilization, the Kessner/Institute of Medicine Index, has not been subjected to systematic examination. This paper provides such an examination. Data from the 1980 National Natality Survey are used to disaggregate the components of the Kessner Index for detailed analysis. An alternative two-part index, the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index, is proposed that combines independent assessments of the timing of prenatal care initiation and the frequency of visits received after initiation. The Kessner Index is seriously flawed. It is heavily weighted toward timing of prenatal care initiation does not distinguish timing of initiation from poor subsequent utilization, inaccurately measures utilization for full- or post-term pregnancies, and lacks sufficient documentation for consistent computer programming. The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index offers a more accurate and comprehensive set of measures of prenatal care utilization than the Kessner Index.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychosocial stress in pregnancy and preterm birth: associations and mechanisms.

              Psychosocial stress during pregnancy (PSP) is a risk factor of growing interest in the etiology of preterm birth (PTB). This literature review assesses the published evidence concerning the association between PSP and PTB, highlighting established and hypothesized physiological pathways mediating this association. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords "psychosocial stress", "pregnancy", "pregnancy stress", "preterm", "preterm birth", "gestational age", "anxiety", and "social support". After applying the exclusion criteria, the search produced 107 articles. The association of PSP with PTB varied according to the dimensions and timing of PSP. Stronger associations were generally found in early pregnancy, and most studies demonstrating positive results found moderate effect sizes, with risk ratios between 1.2 and 2.1. Subjective perception of stress and pregnancy-related anxiety appeared to be the stress measures most closely associated with PTB. Potential physiological pathways identified included behavioral, infectious, neuroinflammatory, and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Future research should examine the biological pathways of these different psychosocial stress dimensions and at multiple time points across pregnancy. Culture-independent characterization of the vaginal microbiome and noninvasive monitoring of cholinergic activity represent two exciting frontiers in this research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31628756928 , jt.vanderwal@vumc.nl , Janneke@hllp.nl
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                17 June 2019
                17 June 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 203
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1092 7967, GRID grid.8273.e, ESRC funded Business and Local Government Data Research Centre (BLG DRC), School of Computing Sciences, , University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, ; Norwich, NR4 7TJ England, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, GRID grid.12380.38, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, , Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ; De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zaans Medical Center, Koningin Julianaplein 58, Zaandam, Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9558 4598, GRID grid.4494.d, Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, ; PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-7246
                Article
                2316
                10.1186/s12884-019-2316-5
                6580473
                31208355
                61b358dc-24aa-4cc7-ad92-e5ec0e4a5305
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 December 2018
                : 25 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives
                Award ID: Fellowship 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                midwifery,prenatal care,patient acceptance of health care,social determinants of health,sexual violence,psychosocial deprivation

                Comments

                Comment on this article