2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Examining the potential influence of crosslinguistic lexical similarity on word-choice transfer in L2 English

      research-article
      1 , * , , 1 , 2
      PLOS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We examined whether and how L1-L2 crosslinguistic formal lexical similarity influences L2 word choice. Our sample included two learner subcorpora, containing 8,500 and 6,390 English texts, written in an educational setting, by speakers of diverse L1s in the A1–B2 CEFR range of L2 proficiency. We quantified similarity based on phonological overlap between L1 words and their L2 (English) translations. This similarity relates to psycholinguistic cognancy, which occurs when words and their translations share a high level of formal similarity, often due to historical cognancy from shared etymology or language contact. We then used mixed-effects statistical models to examine how this similarity influences the rate of use of the L2 words; essentially, we checked whether L2 words that are more similar to their L1 translations are used more often. We also controlled for potential confounds, including the baseline L1 frequency of the English words. The type of crosslinguistic similarity that we examined did not influence learners’ choice of L2 words in their writing in the present sample, which represents a type of educational setting that many learners encounter. This suggests that the influence of such similarity is constrained, and that communicative needs can override transfer from learners’ L1 to their L2, which raises questions regarding when and how else situational factors can influence transfer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.

          We present word frequencies based on subtitles of British television programmes. We show that the SUBTLEX-UK word frequencies explain more of the variance in the lexical decision times of the British Lexicon Project than the word frequencies based on the British National Corpus and the SUBTLEX-US frequencies. In addition to the word form frequencies, we also present measures of contextual diversity part-of-speech specific word frequencies, word frequencies in children programmes, and word bigram frequencies, giving researchers of British English access to the full range of norms recently made available for other languages. Finally, we introduce a new measure of word frequency, the Zipf scale, which we hope will stop the current misunderstandings of the word frequency effect.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                1 February 2023
                2023
                : 18
                : 2
                : e0281137
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Department of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                University of Macerata: Universita degli Studi di Macerata, ITALY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-9010
                Article
                PONE-D-22-31186
                10.1371/journal.pone.0281137
                9891524
                36724191
                61e7b68e-9285-4154-8975-f73958fec25f
                © 2023 Shatz et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 November 2022
                : 15 January 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, Pages: 23
                Funding
                Funded by: Hughes Hall
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Cambridge Assessment English
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004815, Isaac Newton Trust;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: EF- Education First
                Award Recipient :
                I.S. received financial support from Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge ( https://www.hughes.cam.ac.uk/) and Cambridge Assessment English ( https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/). T.A. received financial support from the Isaac Newton Trust at the University of Cambridge ( https://www.newtontrust.cam.ac.uk/) and EF Education First ( https://www.ef.co.uk/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Semantics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Grammar
                Phonology
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Psycholinguistics
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Language Acquisition
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Grammar
                Syntax
                Custom metadata
                All the data and code are available in the following Open Science Framework (OSF) repository: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5EUA8.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article