10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of PBL–CBL combined teaching in thyroid surgery and make observations from the students’ perspectives, based on their satisfaction with the learning process.

          Methods

          We prospectively enrolled 354 fourth-year students majoring in clinical medicine, along with 232 residents, from September 2014 to June 2019. These participants were randomly allocated into either the combined PBL–CBL teaching group or the traditional lecture-based classroom group to attend a course about thyroid nodules. Both pre- and post-class quizzes were conducted. An anonymous questionnaire was also administered to both groups to evaluate the students’ perceptions and experiences. We compared the two teaching methods among all the students as well as with the fourth-year students and residents in subgroups.

          Results

          The traditional group’s pre-class quiz scores were significantly higher than the PBL–CBL group’s (as determined by a two-tailed t-test at a 95% confidence interval, T = 16.483, P < 0.001). After class, in the PBL–CBL group, the mean total quiz score and the basic knowledge and case analysis scores increased significantly ( P < 0.001). The PBL–CBL group’s performance improvement was significantly higher than the traditional group’s (increasing from 52.76 to 70.51 vs. from 67.03 to 71.97). Furthermore, the scores for learning motivation, understanding, student–teacher interaction, the final examination, communication skills, clinical thinking skills, self-learning skills, teamwork skills, and knowledge absorption, as measured by the survey, were significantly higher in the PBL–CBL group than in the traditional group ( P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the survey scores representing the amount of students’ free time the course consumed were significantly lower in the PBL–CBL group than in the traditional group ( P < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          PBL combined with CBL may be an effective method for improving medical students’ and residents’ performance and enhancing their clinical skills.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education.

            The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education (NOS-E) were developed to appraise methodological quality in medical education research. The study objective was to evaluate the interrater reliability, normative scores, and between-instrument correlation for these two instruments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance.

              Since team-based learning (TBL) was introduced as a medical education strategy in 2001, few studies have explored its impact on learning outcomes, particularly as measured by performance on examinations. Educators considering implementing TBL need evidence of its effectiveness. This study was conducted to determine whether student performance on examinations is affected by participation in TBL and whether TBL benefits lower- or higher-performing students. The authors analyzed the performance of second-year medical students on 28 comprehensive course examinations over two consecutive academic years (2003-2004, 2004-2005) at the Boonshoft School of Medicine. The 178 students (86 men, 92 women) included in the study achieved 5.9% (standard deviation [SD] 5.5) higher mean scores on examination questions that assessed their knowledge of pathology-based content learned using the TBL strategy compared with questions assessing pathology-based content learned via other methods (P < .001, t test). Students whose overall academic performance placed them in the lowest quartile of the class benefited more from TBL than did those in the highest quartile. Lowest-quartile students' mean scores were 7.9% (SD 6.0) higher on examination questions related to TBL modules than examination questions not related to TBL modules, whereas highest-quartile students' mean scores were 3.8% (SD 5.4) higher (P = .001, two-way analysis of variance). Medical students' higher performance on examination questions related to course content learned through TBL suggests that TBL enhances mastery of course content. Students in the lowest academic quartile may benefit more than highest-quartile students from the TBL strategy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nankai1989@foxmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                22 October 2020
                22 October 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 381
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412901.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1770 1022, Department of Thyroid Surgery, , West China Hospital, Sichuan University, ; Chengdu, 610041 China
                [2 ]GRID grid.13291.38, ISNI 0000 0001 0807 1581, West China School of Medicine, , Sichuan University, ; Chengdu, 610041 China
                [3 ]GRID grid.412901.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1770 1022, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, MOH; West China-Washington Mitochondria and Metabolism Research Center, , West China Hospital, Sichuan University, ; 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041 NO China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-8941
                Article
                2306
                10.1186/s12909-020-02306-y
                7583209
                33092583
                61fb862c-58b9-465d-ad48-729791556845
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 1 July 2020
                : 14 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013365, West China Hospital, Sichuan University;
                Award ID: 18HXBH074, 18HXBH062
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012542, Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program;
                Award ID: 2019JDKKP0071
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Education
                problem-based learning,case-based learning,traditional lecture,thyroid surgery,clinical practical teaching

                Comments

                Comment on this article