4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Are There Differences among Patients with Inferior Acute Myocardial Infarction with ST Depression in Leads V2 and V3 and Positive versus Negative T Waves in These Leads on Admission?

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We assessed whether there are differences among patients with inferior acute myocardial infarction and ST segment depression in leads V2–V3 between those with positive versus negative T waves on admission. We found no differences in the prevalence of concomitant significant left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis and anterior or posterior wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography between the two groups. Precordial ST segment depression with negative T wave may be the early electrocardiographic pattern of posterior infarction, reflecting ST segment elevation with positive T waves that would have been detected by leads facing the posterior wall.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CRD
          Cardiology
          10.1159/issn.0008-6312
          Cardiology
          S. Karger AG
          0008-6312
          1421-9751
          1998
          March 1999
          22 March 1999
          : 90
          : 4
          : 295-298
          Affiliations
          Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
          Article
          6861 Cardiology 1998;90:295–298
          10.1159/000006861
          10085492
          © 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Figures: 2, Tables: 2, References: 6, Pages: 4
          Categories
          Coronary Care

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Similar content 165

          Cited by 4