2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impacto social de la ciencia y la tecnología cubana en el enfrentamiento a la COVID-19 Translated title: Social Impact of Cuban Science and Technology the Fight Against COVID-19

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Introducción: La ciencia mediante la innovación de los servicios y la tecnología brinda importantes beneficios en función de la sociedad. Objetivo: Proporcionar información sistematizada sobre el impacto social de la ciencia y la tecnología cubana en el enfrentamiento a la COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos Scopus, SciELO, ScienceDirect y MEDLINE/PubMed. Para ello, se utilizaron los descriptores o palabras relacionadas con la temática (ciencia, tecnología, COVID-19). Se consultaron artículos de revisión, de posición, y metaanálisis de los años 2020, 2021 y 2022, de la búsqueda solo 30 artículos cumplieron con los criterios de selección. Resultados: En la etapa pandémica, Cuba depositó toda la confianza en sus científicos y sacó provecho a la industria biotecnológica en la búsqueda de salvaguardar la población. Gracias a la satisfactoria gestión del gobierno se obtuvieron resultados positivos en las investigaciones, a partir de la inventiva de los productos como jusvinza, nasalferon, biomodulina T, entre otros. Se inventó un ventilador pulmonar asistido de alta gama para el tratamiento de los adultos, de este modo se fortaleció el trabajo interinstitucional e intersectorial. Conclusiones: La ciencia, la tecnología y las innovaciones han sido cruciales para el manejo de la crisis sanitaria generada por la COVID-19. En Cuba, se obtuvieron valiosos resultados en diferentes niveles para el beneficio de la sociedad; como las vacunas soberana y Abdala.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Introduction: Both science and technology justify their existence through the innovation of services and technologies for the benefit of society. Objective: To provide systematized information on the social impact of Cuban science and technology in the fight against COVID-19. Methods: A bibliographic search was carried out in Scopus, SciELO, ScienceDirect and MEDLINE/PubMed databases. Descriptors or words related to the theme (science, technology, COVID-19) were used. Review articles, position articles, and meta-analyses from 2020, 2021, and 2022 were consulted. Only 30 articles met the selection criteria. Results: In the pandemic stage, Cuba placed all its trust in its scientists and took advantage of the biotechnology industry in the search for the safeguarding of the population. Thanks to the satisfactory management of the government, good results were obtained in the investigations with the inventiveness of products such as Jusvinza, nasalferon, biomodulin T, among others. A high-end assisted lung ventilator was invented for treating adults, in the same way that inter-institutional and intersectoral work was strengthened. Conclusions: Science, technology, and innovations have been crucial in managing the health crisis caused by COVID-19. In Cuba, relevant results have been obtained at different levels for the benefit of society, among which Soberana and Abdala vaccines stand out.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

          Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

            Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID ‐19 pandemic

              Background Surgeons urgently need guidance on how to deliver surgical services safely and effectively during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The aim was to identify the key domains that should be considered when developing pandemic preparedness plans for surgical services. Methods A scoping search was conducted to identify published articles relating to management of surgical patients during pandemics. Key informant interviews were conducted with surgeons and anaesthetists with direct experience of working during infectious disease outbreaks, in order to identify key challenges and solutions to delivering effective surgical services during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Results Thirteen articles were identified from the scoping search, and surgeons and anaesthetists representing 11 territories were interviewed. To mount an effective response to COVID‐19, a pandemic response plan for surgical services should be developed in advance. Key domains that should be included are: provision of staff training (such as patient transfers, donning and doffing personal protection equipment, recognizing and managing COVID‐19 infection); support for the overall hospital response to COVID‐19 (reduction in non‐urgent activities such as clinics, endoscopy, non‐urgent elective surgery); establishment of a team‐based approach for running emergency services; and recognition and management of COVID‐19 infection in patients treated as an emergency and those who have had surgery. A backlog of procedures after the end of the COVID‐19 pandemic is inevitable, and hospitals should plan how to address this effectively to ensure that patients having elective treatment have the best possible outcomes. Conclusion Hospitals should prepare detailed context‐specific pandemic preparedness plans addressing the identified domains. Specific guidance should be updated continuously to reflect emerging evidence during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                med
                Revista Cubana de Medicina
                Rev. Cuban de Med
                Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas; Editorial Ciencias Médicas (Ciudad de la Habana, , Cuba )
                0034-7523
                1561-302X
                September 2023
                : 62
                : 3
                : e3337
                Affiliations
                [1] Camagüey orgnameHospital Pediátrico Provincial Docente “Dr. Eduardo Agramonte Piña” Cuba
                [2] Camagüey orgnameUniversidad “Ignacio Agramonte Loynaz” Cuba
                Article
                S0034-75232023000300014 S0034-7523(23)06200300014
                62617f27-6b3c-4300-a74d-2d425d9fbba1

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 07 August 2023
                : 23 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Cuba

                Categories
                ARTICULOS DE REVISIÓN

                tecnología,COVID-19,pandemias,science,technology,pandemics,ciencia
                tecnología, COVID-19, pandemias, science, technology, pandemics, ciencia

                Comments

                Comment on this article