9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness

      , ,
      American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To report corneal histopathology associated with keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to evaluate the thickness of the calculated residual stromal bed in two cases and those in the literature. Interventional case reports. Three eyes of two patients developed keratectasia after LASIK. Corneal specimens after penetrating keratoplasty in one eye of each patient were studied histopathologically, and the residual stromal bed was directly measured. For comparison, residual stromal bed thicknesses were calculated from published cases of keratectasia. Two eyes of a 26-year-old woman and one eye of a 22-year-old woman developed keratectasia after LASIK. Calculated residual stromal bed thicknesses were 210, 213, and 261 microm. Histologic sections revealed focal scarring in the flap plane. The cornea specimens measured 75 and 118 microm thinner than calculated values immediately after LASIK. Transmission electron microscopy of one case revealed an average lamellar thickness of 0.94 microm. In 28 (49%) of 57 previous cases of keratectasia, the calculated residual stromal bed thicknesses were greater than 250 microm. Both the flap and the stromal bed of the cornea may thin after LASIK. A residual stromal bed thickness of 250 microm does not preclude the development of keratectasia after LASIK.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          American Journal of Ophthalmology
          American Journal of Ophthalmology
          Elsevier BV
          00029394
          November 2002
          November 2002
          : 134
          : 5
          : 771-773
          Article
          10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01656-2
          12429260
          627e8c53-322b-4b70-ad92-f8162bf0714f
          © 2002

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article