46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change: findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments.

          Methods

          Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys.

          Results

          There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.

          Conclusions

          The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO 2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO 2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 degrees C.

          More than 100 countries have adopted a global warming limit of 2 degrees C or below (relative to pre-industrial levels) as a guiding principle for mitigation efforts to reduce climate change risks, impacts and damages. However, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions corresponding to a specified maximum warming are poorly known owing to uncertainties in the carbon cycle and the climate response. Here we provide a comprehensive probabilistic analysis aimed at quantifying GHG emission budgets for the 2000-50 period that would limit warming throughout the twenty-first century to below 2 degrees C, based on a combination of published distributions of climate system properties and observational constraints. We show that, for the chosen class of emission scenarios, both cumulative emissions up to 2050 and emission levels in 2050 are robust indicators of the probability that twenty-first century warming will not exceed 2 degrees C relative to pre-industrial temperatures. Limiting cumulative CO(2) emissions over 2000-50 to 1,000 Gt CO(2) yields a 25% probability of warming exceeding 2 degrees C-and a limit of 1,440 Gt CO(2) yields a 50% probability-given a representative estimate of the distribution of climate system properties. As known 2000-06 CO(2) emissions were approximately 234 Gt CO(2), less than half the proven economically recoverable oil, gas and coal reserves can still be emitted up to 2050 to achieve such a goal. Recent G8 Communiqués envisage halved global GHG emissions by 2050, for which we estimate a 12-45% probability of exceeding 2 degrees C-assuming 1990 as emission base year and a range of published climate sensitivity distributions. Emissions levels in 2020 are a less robust indicator, but for the scenarios considered, the probability of exceeding 2 degrees C rises to 53-87% if global GHG emissions are still more than 25% above 2000 levels in 2020.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.

              This Series has examined the health implications of policies aimed at tackling climate change. Assessments of mitigation strategies in four domains-household energy, transport, food and agriculture, and electricity generation-suggest an important message: that actions to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions often, although not always, entail net benefits for health. In some cases, the potential benefits seem to be substantial. This evidence provides an additional and immediate rationale for reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions beyond that of climate change mitigation alone. Climate change is an increasing and evolving threat to the health of populations worldwide. At the same time, major public health burdens remain in many regions. Climate change therefore adds further urgency to the task of addressing international health priorities, such as the UN Millennium Development Goals. Recognition that mitigation strategies can have substantial benefits for both health and climate protection offers the possibility of policy choices that are potentially both more cost effective and socially attractive than are those that address these priorities independently. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.sabel@bristol.ac.uk
                Conference
                Environ Health
                Environ Health
                Environmental Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1476-069X
                8 March 2016
                8 March 2016
                2016
                : 15
                Issue : Suppl 1 Issue sponsor : Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of funding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. The articles have been through the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. Supplement Editor competing interests: PW has received research funding to his employing institution from the Natural Environment Research Council, the Wellcome Trust, the European Commission and the National Institute for Health Research on projects relating to sustainability and health in relation to the built environment. SV is the Head of the Environmental Change Department of Public Health England. Four papers (Arbuthnott et al., Salmond et al., Heaviside et al., Woods et al) in this supplement have been co-authored by SV or members of SV's Department. Peer-review of these papers was supervised by another guest editor, Prof Keith Dear, who made editorial decisions. SV is a member of the stakeholder committee for the UCL Complex Built Environment Systems (CBES) Group, which submitted one of the papers recommended for publication (Macmillan et al.). The paper was independently peer-reviewed by an external reviewer as well as by another guest editor (Paul Wilkinson). SV holds honorary academic affiliations with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, the University of Birmingham, and Exeter University. SV has received research funding to their employing institution (PHE) from the European Commission and the National Institute for Health Research on projects relating to urban environmental health and sustainability. KD declares no competing interests.
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [ ]School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1SS UK
                [ ]National Institute for Health and Welfare, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland
                [ ]School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023 China
                [ ]European Centre for Environment and Human health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
                [ ]Air Quality Department, DCMR Environmental Protection Agency Rijnmond, Schiedam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany
                [ ]IOM (Institute of Occupational Medicine), Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland UK
                [ ]National Institute for Health and Welfare, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
                [ ]Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute, 57001 Thermi, Greece
                [ ]Netherlands Organization for Applied Research (TNO), 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [ ]Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [ ]European Centre for Environment and Health, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 53113 Bonn, Germany
                [ ]Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124 Greece
                [ ]The BMJ, BMA House, London, WC1H 9JP UK
                [ ]School of Public Health, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
                Article
                97
                10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0
                4895602
                26960925
                6282e9e2-d638-4959-b88e-a2a99ef41e7b
                © Sabel et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                The 11th International Conference on Urban Health
                Manchester, UK
                06/03/2014
                History
                : 13 January 2016
                : 13 January 2016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Public health
                greenhouse gas emission reduction policies,health,wellbeing,urban,europe,china,air pollution,transport,buildings,energy

                Comments

                Comment on this article