66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Data from observational studies suggest that minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) is superior to open pancreatoduodenectomy regarding intraoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay, without increasing total costs. However, several case-matched studies failed to demonstrate superiority of MIPD, and large registry studies from the USA even suggested increased mortality for MIPDs performed in low-volume (<10 MIPDs annually) centers. Randomized controlled multicenter trials are lacking but clearly required. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIPD compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy, even in an enhanced recovery setting.

          Methods/design

          LEOPARD-2 is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, phase 2/3, superiority trial in centers that completed the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group LAELAPS-2 training program for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy or LAELAPS-3 training program for robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and have performed ≥ 20 MIPDs. A total of 136 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant, or malignant disease will be randomly assigned to undergo minimally invasive or open pancreatoduodenectomy in an enhanced recovery setting. After the first 40 patients (phase 2), the data safety monitoring board will assess safety outcomes (not blinded for treatment allocation) and decide on continuation to phase 3. Patients from phase 2 will then be included in phase 3. The primary outcome measure is time (days) to functional recovery. All patients will be blinded for the surgical approach, at least until postoperative day 5, but preferably until functional recovery has been attained. Secondary outcome measures are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life, and costs.

          Discussion

          The LEOPARD-2 trial is designed to assess whether MIPD reduces time to functional recovery, as compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy in an enhanced recovery setting.

          Trial registration

          Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5689. Registered on 2 March 2016.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding the Hawthorne effect.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

            A case of chronic pancreatitis localized in the head of the pancreas with pancreas divisum was treated by laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. The laparoscopic technique of resection and reconstruction with a gastrojejunostomy, hepaticojejunostomy, and pancreaticojejunostomy is described. The postoperative period was complicated by a jejunal ulcer and delayed gastric emptying necessitating a prolonged hospitalization and intravenous hyperalimentation. No fistulas occurred, a follow-up CT scan revealed no pancreatic abnormalities, and the patient was discharged in good condition on the 30th postoperative day. Although technically feasible, the laparoscopic Whipple procedure may not improve the postoperative outcome or shorten the postoperative recovery period.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

              The lymph node (Ln) status of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an important predictor of survival. The survival benefit of extended lymphadenectomy during pancreatectomy is, however, disputed, and there is no true definition of the optimal extent of the lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to formulate a definition for standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatectomy.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                t.derooij@amc.nl
                j.vanhilst@amc.nl
                k.bosscha@jbz.nl
                m.g.dijkgraaf@amc.nl
                m.f.gerhards@olvg.nl
                b.grootkoerkamp@erasmusmc.nl
                j.hagendoorn-3@umcutrecht.nl
                ignace.d.hingh@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
                t.m.karsten@olvg.nl
                d.lips@jbz.nl
                misha.luyer@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
                i.q.molenaar@umcutrecht.nl
                h.c.vansantvoort@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
                t.tran@erasmusmc.nl
                o.r.busch@amc.nl
                s.festen@olvg.nl
                +31-20-5669111 , m.g.besselink@amc.nl
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                3 January 2018
                3 January 2018
                2018
                : 19
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000404654431, GRID grid.5650.6, Department of Surgery, , Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, ; PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0501 9798, GRID grid.413508.b, Department of Surgery, , Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ; PO Box 90153, 5200 ME Den Bosch, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000404654431, GRID grid.5650.6, Clinical Research Unit, , Academic Medical Center, ; PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.440209.b, Department of Surgery, , Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, ; PO Box 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 000000040459992X, GRID grid.5645.2, Department of Surgery, , Erasmus University Medical Center, ; PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000090126352, GRID grid.7692.a, Department of Surgery, , University Medical Center Utrecht, ; PO Box 85 500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0398 8384, GRID grid.413532.2, Department of Surgery, , Catharina Hospital, ; PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                Article
                2423
                10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4
                5753506
                29298706
                62854b1e-cd02-4475-8d52-663732313233
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 October 2017
                : 18 December 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005566, Ethicon Endo-Surgery;
                Award ID: IIS 15-707
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                minimally invasive,laparoscopic,pancreatoduodenectomy,whipple,robot-assisted
                Medicine
                minimally invasive, laparoscopic, pancreatoduodenectomy, whipple, robot-assisted

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log