43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To assess the impact of communicating DNA based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing health behaviours and motivation to engage in such behaviours.

          Design Systematic review with meta-analysis, using Cochrane methods.

          Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 25 February 2015. Backward and forward citation searches were also conducted.

          Study selection Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials involving adults in which one group received personalised DNA based estimates of disease risk for conditions where risk could be reduced by behaviour change. Eligible studies included a measure of risk-reducing behaviour.

          Results We examined 10 515 abstracts and included 18 studies that reported on seven behavioural outcomes, including smoking cessation (six studies; n=2663), diet (seven studies; n=1784), and physical activity (six studies; n=1704). Meta-analysis revealed no significant effects of communicating DNA based risk estimates on smoking cessation (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.35, P=0.67), diet (standardised mean difference 0.12, 95% confidence interval −0.00 to 0.24, P=0.05), or physical activity (standardised mean difference −0.03, 95% confidence interval −0.13 to 0.08, P=0.62). There were also no effects on any other behaviours (alcohol use, medication use, sun protection behaviours, and attendance at screening or behavioural support programmes) or on motivation to change behaviour, and no adverse effects, such as depression and anxiety. Subgroup analyses provided no clear evidence that communication of a risk-conferring genotype affected behaviour more than communication of the absence of such a genotype. However, studies were predominantly at high or unclear risk of bias, and evidence was typically of low quality.

          Conclusions Expectations that communicating DNA based risk estimates changes behaviour is not supported by existing evidence. These results do not support use of genetic testing or the search for risk-conferring gene variants for common complex diseases on the basis that they motivate risk-reducing behaviour.

          Systematic review registration This is a revised and updated version of a Cochrane review from 2010, adding 11 studies to the seven previously identified.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: senior research associate
          Role: professor of health psychology
          Role: professor of general practice
          Role: professor of medical statistics and clinical trials
          Role: professor of behavioural science
          Role: visiting fellow
          Role: director and professor of behaviour and health
          Journal
          BMJ
          BMJ
          bmj
          The BMJ
          BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
          0959-8138
          1756-1833
          2016
          15 March 2016
          : 352
          : i1102
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
          [2 ]School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
          [3 ]Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
          [4 ]Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: T M Marteau tmm388@ 123456cam.ac.uk
          Article
          holg030916
          10.1136/bmj.i1102
          4793156
          26979548
          6294c5f6-0542-4aad-b0ca-5b44a8d394ba
          Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

          This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

          History
          : 14 February 2016
          Categories
          Research

          Medicine
          Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article