14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The assessment of the optimal duration of early intervention with montelukast in the treatment of Japanese cedar pollinosis symptoms induced in an artificial exposure chamber

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The study objective was to investigate the prophylactic efficacy of montelukast (MLK) 10 mg in suppressing seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms induced by Japanese cedar (JC) pollen and to determine how many days before exposure to JC in the artificial exposure chamber (OHIO chamber) would be optimal to start administration.

          Methods

          This was a single-institution, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled four-group parallel inter-group comparison study. Adult volunteers with JC pollinosis were divided into four groups: an MLK 7-day administration group ( n = 27), an MLK 3-day administration group ( n = 27), an MLK 1-day administration group ( n = 26), and a placebo group ( n = 26). The mean change in total nasal symptom scores (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and sneezing) (TNSS) and each of the nasal symptom scores during exposure of JC pollen in the OHIO chamber were investigated.

          Results

          The mean change in TNSS was significantly lower in the MLK treatment group, regardless of the number of days of administration, than in the placebo group ( p = 0.0192). The results for the individual nasal symptoms showed that nasal obstruction was significantly suppressed in the 1-day administration group as compared with placebo ( p = 0.0076), but no differences were found in sneezing score between any of the groups. For nasal discharge, we found a trend towards the effect clearing up after 3 days of administration. No serious adverse events were observed during the study.

          Conclusion

          Although this study was acute and this artificial exposure model was conducted out of the pollen season, nasal symptoms that developed in the pollen exposure chamber, especially nasal obstruction, were significantly suppressed by starting oral administration of MLK 10 mg at least 1 day before exposure. These results suggest that prophylactic administration of MLK is effective and safe in the treatment of SAR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cysteinyl leukotrienes: multi-functional mediators in allergic rhinitis

          Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are a family of inflammatory lipid mediators synthesized from arachidonic acid by a variety of cells, including mast cells, eosinophils, basophils, and macrophages. This article reviews the data for the role of CysLTs as multi-functional mediators in allergic rhinitis (AR). We review the evidence that: (1) CysLTs are released from inflammatory cells that participate in AR, (2) receptors for CysLTs are located in nasal tissue, (3) CysLTs are increased in patients with AR and are released following allergen exposure, (4) administration of CysLTs reproduces the symptoms of AR, (5) CysLTs play roles in the maturation, as well as tissue recruitment, of inflammatory cells, and (6) a complex inter-regulation between CysLTs and a variety of other inflammatory mediators exists.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Leukotriene receptor antagonists for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            To compare the clinical efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonists with that of placebo, antihistamines, and nasal corticosteroids in patients with allergic rhinitis or nasal polyposis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists in patients with rhinitis. Composite daily rhinitis symptom scores (as a percentage of the maximum score) and rhinitis-specific quality of life (unit scores ranging from 0 to 6) were pooled after assessing heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimates were expressed as weighted mean differences between treatments in a random-effects model. We considered a difference of 10% in nasal score and 0.6 units in quality-of-life score to be clinically relevant. Of the 196 citations, 11 studies on seasonal allergic rhinitis were used in the analysis: eight evaluating leukotriene receptor antagonists alone or in combination with other treatments versus placebo or other treatments (n = 3924) and three evaluating leukotriene receptor antagonists plus an antihistamine (n = 80). Leukotriene receptor antagonists reduced mean daily rhinitis symptom scores (in absolute terms) 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3% to 7%) more than did placebo. However, antihistamines improved the nasal symptoms score 2% (95% CI: 0% to 4%) more than did leukotriene receptor antagonists, and nasal corticosteroids improved the score 12% (95% CI: 5% to 18%) more than did leukotriene antagonists. Leukotriene receptor antagonists significantly improved rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life by 0.3 units (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.36 units) when compared with placebo. There were no randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of leukotriene receptor antagonists on perennial allergic rhinitis or polyposis. Leukotriene receptor antagonists are modestly better than placebo, as effective as antihistamines, but less effective than nasal corticosteroids in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Present situation of cedar pollinosis in Japan and its immune responses.

              Recent observations have suggested significant worldwide increase in the prevalence of allergic rhinitis and cedar pollinosis. In Japan, Japanese cedar (Cryptometria japonica) and Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) pollens are considered to be the major unique allergens and their extent of dispersal is quite large, travelling more than 100km and thus causing serious pollinosis. Cedar pollinosis is a typical type 1 allergic disease by an adaptive immune response that occurs through the induction of allergen-specific effector T cells from naïve T cells. We examined the number of Japanese cedar pollen specific memory Th cells in the peripheral blood of the patients and found that the cedar pollen specific IL-4-producing Th2 memory cells increased during the pollen season and decreased during the off-season. However, more than 60% of the cedar-specific memory Th2 cells survived up to 8 months after the pollen season. Natural killer T(NKT) cells represent a unique lymphocyte subpopulation and their activity is not restricted to MHC antigens. NKT cells play an important role in innate immunity, however, the participation in development of allergic rhinitis could not be clarified.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Drug Assess
                J Drug Assess
                IJDA
                Journal of Drug Assessment
                Taylor & Francis
                2155-6660
                2012
                9 October 2012
                : 1
                : 1
                : 40-47
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Futaba Clinic, TokyoJapan
                [2 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, TokyoJapan
                [3 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kitasato Institute Hospital, TokyoJapan
                [4 ]Tanaka ENT Clinic, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Medical Center East, TokyoJapan
                [5 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Keio University School of Medicine, TokyoJapan
                [6 ]Pharmaceutical Department, Medical Corporation Shinanokai, Samoncho Clinic, TokyoJapan
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Kazuhiro Hashiguchi, MD, Department of Otolaryngology, Futaba Clinic, 20 Samon-cho, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 106-0017, Japan. Tel.: +81 3-3351-4133; Fax: +81 3-3351-4133; futaba-hashi@ 123456h00.itscom.net
                Article
                ijda-1-40
                10.3109/21556660.2012.728547
                4980728
                62c2e330-7d2a-4b66-a06d-45be508b4832
                © 2012 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : Accepted on September 06, 2012
                Categories
                Original Articles

                early intervention,environmental exposure chamber,japanese cedar pollinosis,montelukast clinical trial registration: umin clinical trials registry number

                Comments

                Comment on this article