0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      FGFR-associated craniosynostosis syndromes and gastrointestinal defects

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">Craniosynostosis is a relatively common birth defect characterized by the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. Examples of craniosynostosis syndromes include Crouzon (CS), Pfeiffer (PS) and Apert (AS) syndrome, with clinical characteristics such as midface hypoplasia, hypertelorism and in some cases, limb defects. Mutations in <i>Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-2</i> comprise the majority of known mutations in syndromic forms of craniosynostosis. A number of clinical reports of <i>FGFR-</i>associated craniosynostosis patients and mouse mutants have been linked to gastrointestinal tract (GIT) disorders, leading to the hypothesis of a direct link between <i>FGFR-</i>associated craniosynostosis syndromes and GIT malformations. We conducted an investigation to determine GIT symptoms in a sample of <i>FGFR-</i>associated craniosynostosis syndrome patients and a mouse model of CS containing a mutation (W290R) in <i>Fgfr2</i>. We found that, compared to the general population, the incidence of intestinal/bowel malrotation (IM) was present at a higher level in our sample population of patients with <i>FGFR</i>-associated craniosynostosis syndromes. We also showed that the mouse model of CS had an increased incidence of cecal displacement, suggestive of IM. These findings suggest a direct relationship between FGFR-related craniosynostosis syndromes and GIT malformations. Our study may shed further light on the potential widespread impact <i>FGFR</i> mutations on different developmental systems. Based on reports of GIT malformations in children with craniosynostosis syndromes and substantiation with our animal model, GIT malformations should be considered in any child with an FGFR2-associated craniosynostosis syndrome. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Crystal structures of two FGF-FGFR complexes reveal the determinants of ligand-receptor specificity.

          To elucidate the structural determinants governing specificity in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling, we have determined the crystal structures of FGF1 and FGF2 complexed with the ligand binding domains (immunoglobulin-like domains 2 [D2] and 3 [D3]) of FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) and FGFR2, respectively. Highly conserved FGF-D2 and FGF-linker (between D2-D3) interfaces define a general binding site for all FGF-FGFR complexes. Specificity is achieved through interactions between the N-terminal and central regions of FGFs and two loop regions in D3 that are subject to alternative splicing. These structures provide a molecular basis for FGF1 as a universal FGFR ligand and for modulation of FGF-FGFR specificity through primary sequence variations and alternative splicing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intestinal malrotation: varied clinical presentation from infancy through adulthood.

            The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical presentation of intestinal malrotation from infancy through adulthood by examining the experience of a single institution caring for patients of all ages with this condition. We conducted a retrospective review on all patients diagnosed with intestinal malrotation at Massachusetts General Hospital between 1992 and 2009. Patient demographics, clinical history, diagnostic tests, operative procedures, and outcome variables were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: infants (<1 year), children (1-18 years), and adults (18 years). We identified 170 patients, of whom 31% were infants, 21% were children, and 48% were adults. Infants nearly always presented with emesis (93%), whereas adults most commonly presented with abdominal pain (87%), and less often with emesis (37%) or nausea (31%). The incidence of volvulus declined with age, from 37% to 22% to 12%, in each of the 3 age groups, respectively. Although infants were most often diagnosed within hours or days of symptom onset, 59% of children and 32% of adults experienced symptoms for years before diagnosis. Upper gastrointestinal series was the most common imaging study performed in infants and children, but was replaced by abdominal computed tomography in adults. All infants and children underwent a Ladd's procedure, compared with only 61% of adults. The majority of patients experienced resolution of symptoms after operative intervention, although this decreased slightly with age. Intestinal malrotation can occur in patients of any age and, in contrast with traditional teaching, nearly half of these patients may present during adulthood. An increased awareness of this entity and an understanding of its varied presentation at different ages may reduce time to diagnosis and improve patient outcome. Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Intestinal malrotation in adolescents and adults: spectrum of clinical and imaging features.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
                Am. J. Med. Genet.
                Wiley
                15524825
                December 2016
                December 2016
                August 02 2016
                : 170
                : 12
                : 3215-3221
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Dentistry; University of Toronto; Toronto Canada
                [2 ]Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics; Department of Paediatrics; The Hospital for Sick Children; Toronto Canada
                [3 ]Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Surgery; The Hospital for Sick Children; Toronto Canada
                [4 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; San Francisco General Hospital; Trauma Institute; School of Medicine; The University of California at San Francisco; San Francisco California
                Article
                10.1002/ajmg.a.37862
                5503117
                27481450
                6302b665-378c-4b36-8326-724d21cb1ebc
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article