7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chitosan Extraction from Goliathus orientalis Moser, 1909: Characterization and Comparison with Commercially Available Chitosan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chitosan is a polymer obtained by deacetylation of chitin, and chitin is one of the major components of the arthropod cuticle. Chitin and chitosan are both polysaccharides and are considered to be an interesting class of biosourced materials. This is evident as chitosan has already demonstrated utility in various applications in both industrial and biomedical domains. In the present work, we study the possibility to extract chitin and prepare chitosan from the Goliath beetle Goliathus orientalis Moser. The presented work includes description of this process and observation of the macroscopic and microscopic variations that occur in the specimen during the treatment. The prepared chitosan is characterized and compared with commercially available chitosan using infrared and thermogravimetric analysis. The deacetylation degree of prepared chitosan is also evaluated and compared with commercially available shrimp chitosan.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perspectives for chitosan based antimicrobial films in food applications

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption

              Background Greenhouse gas (GHG) production, as a cause of climate change, is considered as one of the biggest problems society is currently facing. The livestock sector is one of the large contributors of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Also, large amounts of ammonia (NH3), leading to soil nitrification and acidification, are produced by livestock. Therefore other sources of animal protein, like edible insects, are currently being considered. Methodology/Principal Findings An experiment was conducted to quantify production of carbon dioxide (CO2) and average daily gain (ADG) as a measure of feed conversion efficiency, and to quantify the production of the greenhouse gases methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) as well as NH3 by five insect species of which the first three are considered edible: Tenebrio molitor, Acheta domesticus, Locusta migratoria, Pachnoda marginata, and Blaptica dubia. Large differences were found among the species regarding their production of CO2 and GHGs. The insects in this study had a higher relative growth rate and emitted comparable or lower amounts of GHG than described in literature for pigs and much lower amounts of GHG than cattle. The same was true for CO2 production per kg of metabolic weight and per kg of mass gain. Furthermore, also the production of NH3 by insects was lower than for conventional livestock. Conclusions/Significance This study therefore indicates that insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein with respect to GHG and NH3 emissions. The results of this study can be used as basic information to compare the production of insects with conventional livestock by means of a life cycle analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomimetics (Basel)
                Biomimetics (Basel)
                biomimetics
                Biomimetics
                MDPI
                2313-7673
                26 April 2020
                June 2020
                : 5
                : 2
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut de Physique de Nice (INPHYNI), Université Côte d’Azur, UMR 7010, 06000 Nice, France; pauline.fourniernice@ 123456gmail.com (P.F.); rp.godeau@ 123456club-internet.fr (R.-P.G.)
                [2 ]Institut Méditerranéen du Risque de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable (IMREDD), Université Côte d’Azur, 06200 Nice, France
                [3 ]Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; szcz@ 123456msu.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: guilhem.godeau@ 123456univ-cotedazur.fr ; Tel.: +33-489-152-904
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6991-970X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2111-9858
                Article
                biomimetics-05-00015
                10.3390/biomimetics5020015
                7345855
                32357519
                6315aa08-6ed3-4388-8db0-07041352b1de
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 February 2020
                : 23 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                goliath beetle,biopolymer extraction,chitin,chitosan
                goliath beetle, biopolymer extraction, chitin, chitosan

                Comments

                Comment on this article