53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: Evolving Paradigms and Future Directions

      review-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 8 , 3 , 9 , 8 , 3 , 10 , 11 , 2 , 3 , 8 , 3 , 10 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 ,
      Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
      Elsevier
      Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis, Biomarkers, Hepatic Arterial Infusion, High-Risk Colorectal Cancer, Recurrence, CDX2, caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2, CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen, cfDNA, cell-free DNA, CK, cytokeratin, CRC, colorectal cancer, CRLM, colorectal cancer liver metastasis, CTC, circulating tumor cells, DFS, disease-free survival, dMMR, deficient mismatch repair, EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule, 5-FU, fluorouracil, HAI, hepatic arterial infusion, IL, interleukin, LV, leucovorin, miRNA, microRNA, MSI, microsatellite instability, OS, overall survival, PD, programmed death, TH, T-helper

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) that metastasizes to the liver, there are several key goals for improving outcomes including early detection, effective prognostic indicators of treatment response, and accurate identification of patients at high risk for recurrence. Although new therapeutic regimens developed over the past decade have increased survival, there is substantial room for improvement in selecting targeted treatment regimens for the patients who will derive the most benefit. Recently, there have been exciting developments in identifying high-risk patient cohorts, refinements in the understanding of systemic vs localized drug delivery to metastatic niches, liquid biomarker development, and dramatic advances in tumor immune therapy, all of which promise new and innovative approaches to tackling the problem of detecting and treating the metastatic spread of CRC to the liver. Our multidisciplinary group held a state-of-the-science symposium this past year to review advances in this rapidly evolving field. Herein, we present a discussion around the issues facing treatment of patients with CRC liver metastases, including the relationship of discrete gene signatures with prognosis. We also discuss the latest advances to maximize regional and systemic therapies aimed at decreasing intrahepatic recurrence, review recent insights into the tumor microenvironment, and summarize advances in noninvasive multimodal biomarkers for early detection of primary and recurrent disease. As we continue to advance clinically and technologically in the field of colorectal tumor biology, our goal should be continued refinement of predictive and prognostic studies to decrease recurrence after curative resection and minimize treatment toxicity to patients through a tailored multidisciplinary approach to cancer care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

          A method for enumerating circulating tumor cells (CTC) has received regulatory clearance. The primary objective of this prospective study was to establish the relationship between posttreatment CTC count and overall survival (OS) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Secondary objectives included determining the prognostic utility of CTC measurement before initiating therapy, and the relationship of CTC to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes and OS at these and other time points. Blood was drawn from CRPC patients with progressive disease starting a new line of chemotherapy before treatment and monthly thereafter. Patients were stratified into predetermined Favorable or Unfavorable groups ( or =5 CTC/7.5mL). Two hundred thirty-one of 276 enrolled patients (84%) were evaluable. Patients with Unfavorable pretreatment CTC (57%) had shorter OS (median OS, 11.5 versus 21.7 months; Cox hazard ratio, 3.3; P 26 to 9.3 months). CTC are the most accurate and independent predictor of OS in CRPC. These data led to Food and Drug Administration clearance of this assay for the evaluation of CRPC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases.

            There is a need for clearly defined and widely applicable clinical criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Such criteria would also be useful for stratification of patients in clinical trials for this disease. Clinical, pathologic, and outcome data for 1001 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between July 1985 and October 1998 were examined. These resections included 237 trisegmentectomies, 394 lobectomies, and 370 resections encompassing less than a lobe. The surgical mortality rate was 2.8%. The 5-year survival rate was 37%, and the 10-year survival rate was 22%. Seven factors were found to be significant and independent predictors of poor long-term outcome by multivariate analysis: positive margin (p = 0.004), extrahepatic disease (p = 0.003), node-positive primary (p = 0.02), disease-free interval from primary to metastases 1 (p = 0.0004), largest hepatic tumor >5 cm (p = 0.01), and carcinoembryonic antigen level >200 ng/ml (p = 0.01). When the last five of these criteria were used in a preoperative scoring system, assigning one point for each criterion, the total score was highly predictive of outcome (p < 0.0001). No patient with a score of 5 was a long-term survivor. Resection of hepatic colorectal metastases may produce long-term survival and cure. Long-term outcome can be predicted from five criteria that are readily available for all patients considered for resection. Patients with up to two criteria can have a favorable outcome. Patients with three, four, or five criteria should be considered for experimental adjuvant trials. Studies of preoperative staging techniques or of adjuvant therapies should consider using such a score for stratification of patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Macrophage IL-10 blocks CD8+ T cell-dependent responses to chemotherapy by suppressing IL-12 expression in intratumoral dendritic cells.

              Blockade of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) limits macrophage infiltration and improves response of mammary carcinomas to chemotherapy. Herein we identify interleukin (IL)-10 expression by macrophages as the critical mediator of this phenotype. Infiltrating macrophages were the primary source of IL-10 within tumors, and therapeutic blockade of IL-10 receptor (IL-10R) was equivalent to CSF-1 neutralization in enhancing primary tumor response to paclitaxel and carboplatin. Improved response to chemotherapy was CD8(+) T cell-dependent, but IL-10 did not directly suppress CD8(+) T cells or alter macrophage polarization. Instead, IL-10R blockade increased intratumoral dendritic cell expression of IL-12, which was necessary for improved outcomes. In human breast cancer, expression of IL12A and cytotoxic effector molecules were predictive of pathological complete response rates to paclitaxel.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Elsevier
                2352-345X
                March 2017
                20 January 2017
                : 3
                : 2
                : 163-173
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [8 ]Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [2 ]Department of Cell Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [3 ]The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [9 ]School of Nursing, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [10 ]Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [11 ]Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon
                [4 ]Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
                [5 ]Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Solid Tumor Division, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
                [6 ]Stanford Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
                [7 ]Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence Address correspondence to: Skye C. Mayo, MD, Department of Surgery, Oregon Heath and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mailcode L223, Portland, Oregon 97239. fax: (503) 494–8884.Department of SurgeryOregon Heath and Science University3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mailcode L223PortlandOregon 97239 mayos@ 123456ohsu.edu
                Article
                S2352-345X(17)30011-5
                10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.01.006
                5331831
                28275683
                631efe08-b341-42bd-b6d8-ac3ef5e752c3
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 7 October 2016
                : 11 January 2017
                Categories
                Review

                colorectal cancer liver metastasis,biomarkers,hepatic arterial infusion,high-risk colorectal cancer,recurrence,cdx2, caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2,cea, carcinoembryonic antigen,cfdna, cell-free dna,ck, cytokeratin,crc, colorectal cancer,crlm, colorectal cancer liver metastasis,ctc, circulating tumor cells,dfs, disease-free survival,dmmr, deficient mismatch repair,egfr, epidermal growth factor receptor,epcam, epithelial cell adhesion molecule,5-fu, fluorouracil,hai, hepatic arterial infusion,il, interleukin,lv, leucovorin,mirna, microrna,msi, microsatellite instability,os, overall survival,pd, programmed death,th, t-helper

                Comments

                Comment on this article