31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about malaria among the South Asian population

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Malaria is one of the deadliest mosquito-borne diseases in the world. More than 80% of the total populations are at risk of malaria in the 22 countries in Asia and the Pacific. South Asia alone is home to an estimated 1.4 billion people at risk of contracting malaria. Despite the remarkable progress in reducing the burden of malaria, evidence of the disease based on knowledge of the social and cultural contexts from a South Asian perspective is limited. Our objective was to understand the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about malaria in South Asian communities.

          Methodology

          We conducted a systematic literature review, searching six databases, between 1990 and 2015, focusing on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about malaria in South Asia. Databases were searched using both ‘free terms’ and ‘index terms’ funnelled using Boolean operators and truncations. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set, and included papers were scrutinised, employing a critical appraisal tool to find the best available evidences to support the study purpose.

          Results and discussion

          Evidence from 32 articles (26 quantitative, four qualitative and two mixed methods). General knowledge and awareness of the disease, its transmission, and control and preventative measures were generally found to be lacking amongst both the general public and healthcare professionals. In addition, the study shows that poor socio-economic factors – including limited access to services due to poor/limited availability – and issues of affordability are considered as major risk factors.

          Conclusion

          This review suggests the importance of increasing health awareness, mobilising the local or community healthcare professionals, for prevention as well as early detection and effective treatment of malaria among people who are at risk. Malaria is also a disease associated with poverty and socio-cultural factors; therefore, strong political will, wider partnerships between health and non-health sectors, and strengthening health systems’ technical and managerial capabilities at all level of primary healthcare systems, is inevitable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the treatment of malaria

          (2015)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic review and meta-analysis: when one study is just not enough.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A critical review of behavioral issues related to malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa: what contributions have social scientists made?

              In 1996, Social Science & Medicine published a review of treatment seeking for malaria (McCombie, 1996). Since that time, a significant amount of socio-behavioral research on the home management of malaria has been undertaken. In addition, recent initiatives such as Roll Back Malaria have emphasized the importance of social science inputs to malaria research and control. However, there has been a growing feeling that the potential contributions that social science could and should be making to malaria research and control have yet to be fully realized. To address these issues, this paper critically reviews and synthesizes the literature (published, unpublished and technical reports) pertaining to the home management of illness episodes of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa from 1996 to the end of 2000, and draws conclusions about the use of social science in malaria research and control. The results suggest that while we have amassed increasing quantities of descriptive data on treatment seeking behavior, we still have little understanding of the rationale of drug use from the patient perspective and, perhaps more importantly, barely any information on the rationale of provider behaviors. However, the results underline the dynamic and iterative nature of treatment seeking with multiple sources of care frequently being employed during a single illness episode; and highlight the importance in decision making of gender, socio-economic and cultural position of individuals within households and communities. Furthermore, the impact of political, structural and environmental factors on treatment seeking behaviors is starting to be recognised. Programs to address these issues may be beyond single sector (malaria control programme) interventions, but social science practice in malaria control needs to reflect a realistic appraisal of the complexities that govern human behavior and include critical appraisal and proposals for practical action. Major concerns arising from the review were the lack of evidence of 'social scientist' involvement (particularly few from endemic countries) in much of the published research; and concerns with methodological rigor. To increase the effective use of social science, we should focus on a new orientation for field research (including increased methodological rigor), address the gaps in research knowledge, strengthen the relationship between research, policy and practice; and concentrate on capacity strengthening and advocacy. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Infect Ecol Epidemiol
                Infect Ecol Epidemiol
                IEE
                Infection Ecology & Epidemiology
                Co-Action Publishing
                2000-8686
                02 May 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 10.3402/iee.v6.30822
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
                [2 ]Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Krishna Regmi, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, LU2 8LE, UK, Email: Krishna.Regmi@ 123456beds.ac.uk

                Responsible Editor: Sven Bergström, Umeå University, Sweden.

                Article
                30822
                10.3402/iee.v6.30822
                4854845
                27141987
                633e679e-94cf-4c1a-bca4-b487a562c6b0
                © 2016 Krishna Regmi et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 December 2015
                : 02 April 2016
                : 06 April 2016
                Categories
                Review Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                malaria,south asia,primary healthcare,eradicating malaria,control and prevention,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article