7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The impact of home care nurses’ numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To explore home care nurses’ numeracy and graph literacy and their relationship to comprehension of visualized data. A multifactorial experimental design using online survey software. Nurses were recruited from 2 Medicare-certified home health agencies. Numeracy and graph literacy were measured using validated scales. Nurses were randomized to 1 of 4 experimental conditions. Each condition displayed data for 1 of 4 quality indicators, in 1 of 4 different visualized formats (bar graph, line graph, spider graph, table). A mixed linear model measured the impact of numeracy, graph literacy, and display format on data understanding. In all, 195 nurses took part in the study. They were slightly more numerate and graph literate than the general population. Overall, nurses understood information presented in bar graphs most easily (88% correct), followed by tables (81% correct), line graphs (77% correct), and spider graphs (41% correct). Individuals with low numeracy and low graph literacy had poorer comprehension of information displayed across all formats. High graph literacy appeared to enhance comprehension of data regardless of numeracy capabilities. Clinical dashboards are increasingly used to provide information to clinicians in visualized format, under the assumption that visual display reduces cognitive workload. Results of this study suggest that nurses’ comprehension of visualized information is influenced by their numeracy, graph literacy, and the display format of the data. Individual differences in numeracy and graph literacy skills need to be taken into account when designing dashboard technology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples

          Numeracy, how facile people are with basic probability and mathematical concepts, is associated with how people perceive health risks. Performance on simple numeracy problems has been poor among populations with little as well as more formal education. Here, we examine how highly educated participants performed on a general and an expanded numeracy scale. The latter was designed within the context of health risks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature.

            This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of evidence for the use of clinical and quality dashboards in health care environments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison.

              Visual displays are often used to communicate important medical information to patients. However, even the simplest graphs are not understood by everyone. To develop and test a scale to measure health-related graph literacy and investigate the level of graph literacy in the United States and Germany. Experimental and questionnaire studies. Setting. Computerized studies in the laboratory and on probabilistic national samples in the United States and Germany. Participants. Nationally representative samples of people 25 to 69 years of age in Germany (n = 495) and the United States (n = 492). Laboratory pretest on 60 younger and 60 older people. Measurements. Psychometric properties of the scale (i.e., reliability, validity, discriminability) and level of graph literacy in the two countries. The new graph literacy scale predicted which patients can benefit from visual aids and had promising measurement properties. Participants in both countries completed approximately 9 of 13 items correctly (in Germany, x¯ = 9.4, s = 2.6; in the United States, x¯ = 9.3, s = 2.9). Approximately one third of the population in both countries had both low graph literacy and low numeracy skills. Limitations. The authors focused on basic graph literacy only. They used a computerized scale; comparability with paper-and-pencil versions should be checked. The new graph literacy scale seems to be a suitable tool for assessing whether patients understand common graphical formats and shows that not everyone profits from standard visual displays. Research is needed on communication formats that can overcome the barriers of both low numeracy and graph literacy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1067-5027
                1527-974X
                February 2018
                February 01 2018
                April 27 2017
                February 2018
                February 01 2018
                April 27 2017
                : 25
                : 2
                : 175-182
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
                [2 ]Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, USA
                [3 ]VNA Health Group, Red Bank, NJ, USA
                Article
                10.1093/jamia/ocx042
                7647125
                28460091
                6347b556-435a-4f4a-aff2-0154ed7a2460
                © 2017

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article