The concept of the exposome refers to the totality of environmental exposures, including
general or specific external, internal, and psychosocial factors, affecting the body
from the embryonic period to the old age. The importance of exposome for the development
of chronic diseases and multiorgan failure may account for about 70 to 90% of disease
risks. It has been documented that the majority of important chronic diseases are
likely to result from the combination of environmental exposures to infective, chemical,
and physical stressors and their interaction with the human genome [1–4]. Most often,
a number of different exposomic risk factors may act simultaneously and exert cumulative
effect.
When trying to understand the factors responsible for the individual sensitivity to
the development of malignant and chronic diseases, the emphasis has been placed on
individual genetic variations due to single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and their
proteome-related response. They can be defined as genetic exposure susceptibility
to disease development. Polymorphic variants in oxidative stress enzymes may explain
the interindividual variability in response to chronic disease, tumor development,
and tumor therapy.
Among specific external exposures, the infectious agents, especially viruses, environmental
pollutants, drugs, diet, lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol abuse), and medical interventions
(supplemental oxygen ventilation and high flow oxygen therapy of critically ill patients),
may affect cell and tissue systems, due to a deregulated free radical production and
their neutralization [5]. The balance between the exposome and endogenous circulating
hormones, body composition, aging, inflammation, wider social, economic, and psychological
influences may affect the host individual response and the disease outcome.
The objective of the special issue is to provide molecular mechanisms related to how
specific environmental factors provoke reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and
how ROS, as a part of environmental exposure or internal production, can affect human
health. It includes articles related to the role of free radicals and multiomics in
describing exposomic marker and other biomarkers of a disease. The originality lies
in the ability to distinguish and recognize the earliest and innovative exposomic
biomarkers accurately, the earliest genetic predisposition markers, and new therapeutic
influences in disease diagnostics, prevention, and treatment. The articles may be
clustered concerning specific type(s) of diseases and to specific environmental factors.
All of the abovementioned exposomic factors are shown in Figure 1.
Devastating effects of viral infections, particularly the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic
and HCV infection, may belong to the most important external exposures at the moment.
Four of eight published articles refer to viral infections. They are related to a
deeper explanation of molecular mechanisms associated with late consequences and serious
organ damage. The authors Zdravković M et al. and Popadić et al. in their collaborating
studies nested from more than 1000 COVID-19 patients per month. They emphasized the
importance of the appropriate risk stratification in 460 COVID-19 patients with a
higher risk of poor clinical outcomes at admission to the ICU, under the specific
(prooxidative) conditions demanding high oxygen flow. The clinical outcome of the
disease includes acute respiratory distress syndrome, superinfection, shock, acute
heart, liver, and kidney injury, evaluated also by specific laboratory biomarkers.
The use of AIDA score has been defined as a reliable tool for delivering the appropriate
therapy on time. It was developed by combining significant variables from the multivariate
logistic regression analysis including serum albumin, interleukin-6, and D-dimer,
accompanied by age. They also developed and validated a multivariable predictive model
for mortality of COVID-19 patients at admission to ICU, in relation to respiratory
status (development of acute respiratory distress syndrome ARDS) as the most important
clinical outcome. The appearance of ARDS was considered in relation to invasive or
noninvasive mechanical ventilation and high flow oxygen therapy. In the final multivariate
analysis, serum albumin (below 33 g/L), interleukin-6 (above 72 pg/mL), and D-dimer,
accompanied by age and CT severity score as parts of univariate analysis, were marked
as independent predictors of mortality. These predictors have been referred to the
three most probable pathophysiological mechanisms of a lethal outcome, septic infections
associated with septic shock, procoagulable state, procoagulant state associated with
micro- and macrothrombosis, and cytokine storm proceeded to multiorgan failure. The
COVID-19 research-related articles were followed by a research of Cekerevac et al.
This is the first study where it documented the level of circulating oxidative stress
parameters as predictors in the disease severity and mortality. In their prospective
cross-sectional study, they reported novel information about potential molecular mechanisms
during the different degree of COVID-19 in adult patients, due to the infiltration
of neutrophils, a marked elevation of proinflammatory cytokines, and cytokine storm
association with elevated levels of superoxide anion radicals. They may act as significant
contributors to the disease progress, severity, and mortality. Moreover, by using
a linear regression model, they documented that hypertension, anosmia, ageusia, the
O2
−level, and the duration at the ICU may be predictors of severity of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)
disease in a group of 127 patients. In order to evaluate the influence of severity
of the disease, all patients were divided into a group with a mild form of COVID-19
(mild symptoms up to mild pneumonia, with moderate COVID-19 form (dyspnea, hypoxia,
or less than 50% lung involvement on imaging) and a group of patients with a severe
COVID-19 (severe respiratory failure, high flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation,
sepsis, or multiorgan system dysfunction). Besides the evaluation of standard laboratory
markers, the concentration of prooxidative markers (superoxide anion radical (O2
−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitric oxide (NO−), and lipid peroxidation (TBARS))
and antioxidative markers (catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and reduced
glutathione GSH) were determined in blood plasma and lysate.
The association of chronic HCV infection-specific genotype and viral load association
with increased oxidative stress has been emphasized by a comprehensive study by Đorđevic
et al. The intensity of oxidative stress may be a detrimental factor in liver injury
and may determine the severity of the disease. In their case-control study, which
involved 52 HCV patients and 50 control healthy patients, they demonstrated the intensity
of oxidative stress (level of lipid peroxidation TBARS and protein oxidative modification
AOPP) and decreased antioxidative defense (catalase activity) as a detrimental factor
in liver injury and severity of the disease. The cells responsible for ROS production
and liberation are hepatocytes, Kupffer cells (resident macrophages), inflammatory
cells, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and other immune effector cells. The values
of oxidative stress parameters (TBARS and AOPP) and catalase activity in patients
infected with different HCV genotypes revealed that HCV1b patients were more likely
to have a higher TBARS compared to others, HCV 3 patients were more likely to have
a higher AOPP level, while patients infected with HCV1a were more likely to have a
low catalase activity. A positive correlation was found between virus genome copy
concentration and AOPP, while a high level of HCV viral load was more likely to have
a higher TBARS. In a gender-based comparison, a significantly higher level of AOPP
was reported in female patients. The results obtained confirmed the existence of imbalance
between the ROS production and antioxidative defense system in HCV-infected patients.
Since oxidative stress may have a profound influence on disease progression, fibrosis,
and carcinogenesis, our results may meet the aspirations of mandatory introduction
of antioxidants as early HCV therapy to counteract ROS consequences.
In in the cohort of 292 participants of adult population, Klisic et al. highlighted
the role of internal exposome as potential factors specific to the individual physiology,
age, and body morphology and their relation to oxidative stress markers. They examined
a prooxidant-antioxidant balance (PAB)) and the marker of antioxidant defense capacity
(total sulphydryl groups (tSHG)), their ratio (PAB/tSHG) and their relationship with
different cardiometabolic risk factors (waist-to-height ratio, body mass index, visceral
adiposity index, and lipid accumulation products). They reported tSHG and PAB/tSHG
correlation with lipid parameters (HDL-c and TG) and lipid indices (VAI and LAP);
HDL-c showed negative and TG, VAI, and LAP positive independent associations and predictions.
To assess the associations of clinical markers with tSHG, PAB levels and PAB/tSHG
index univariate and multivariate ordinal regression analyses were applied. By using
principal component analysis (PCA), various cardiometabolic risk parameters produced
scores for significant factors, which were used in the subsequent binary logistic
regression analysis to estimate the predictive potency of the factors towards the
highest PAB and tSHG values. In that way, obesity-renal function-related factor predicted
both high PAB and low tSHG, while obesity-dyslipidemia-related factor predicted significantly
high tSHG values. The authors concluded that unfavorable cardiometabolic profile was
associated with higher tSHG values.
Durand et al. addressed the importance of oxidative stress as a pathogenetic key for
development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The severity of hepatic damage
depends on whether simple fat accumulation (steatosis), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH), and hepatic fibrosis are developed. The lipid composition of mitochondrial
membranes, presumably the composition of PE and CL is of crucial importance in maintaining
mitochondrial structure and function in the assembly and activity of respiratory chain
complexes III and IV and supercomplex formation. Accordingly, in the transport of
electrons from complex I to ubiquinone, the oxidized state of coenzyme Q (CoQ) depends
on the composition of lipophilic environment, i.e., cardiolipins (CLs). Their experimental
model of NAFLD has been developed to integrate specific “omics” signature (lipidomics)
and oxidative stress markers specifically adapted for mitochondrial liver cell fraction.
Moreover, the mRNA expression levels for the key transcription factors for lipid synthesis,
sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1 (Srebf1), nuclear receptor
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (Pparα) and inflammation, Toll-like receptor
9 (Tlr9), and tumor necrosis factor (Tnf-α) were evaluated. The cardiolipin and CoQ
antioxidant function impairment precede fibrosis, emphasizing a causal relationship
with NAFLD development and progression. The optimal structure of mitochondrial lipids
may represent a new therapeutic intervention in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
prevention strategy.
It was documented that cancer develops from a combination of exposomic factors influencing
specific susceptibility genes and family history. Among exposomic factors, there are
specific external exposures and body-related internal exposome (Figure 1). The clear-cell
renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) belongs to types of carcinomas associated with Keap1/Nrf2
(Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1/nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like2) pathway
alterations. The authors Mihailovic et al. highlighted the relation between the reactive
oxygen species and electrophiles and the activation of specific adaptive cytoprotective
response, including changes in the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway. The enzymes encoded by Nrf2
target genes are glutathione S-transferases (GST), superoxide dismutase (SOD2), and
glutathione peroxidase (GPX). The interaction between GSTP1: JNK1 may reveal the functional
link between the upregulated GSTP1 and malignant phenotype. At the same time, the
reaction catalyzed by mitochondrial SOD2 releases H2O2, which may act as the signaling
molecule in cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration. It may also induce
the activation of AMP-activated kinase activating glycolysis, where the energy production
is essential for malignant cell survival. The antioxidant enzyme, glutathione peroxidase
(GPX), catalyzes the reduction of H2O2. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms of Nrf2
gene and genes encoding GSTP1, SOD2, and GPX1 may change the expression of specific
protein or affect the activity of synthesized proteins. The authors investigated the
effect of specific Nrf2, SOD2, and GPX1 gene variants and GSTP1ABCD haplotype on ccRCC
risk and the prognosis in 223 ccRCC patients and 336 matched controls by PCR-CTTP
and qPCR. Haplotype analysis revealed a significant risk of ccRCC development in carriers
of the GSTP1C haplotype, while GSTP1 variant affected the overall survival in ccRCC
patients. The increased ccRCC susceptibility was observed among carriers of individual
variant genotypes of SOD2 and GSTP1 and Nrf2. Moreover, the analysis of GSTP1ABCD
haplotype revealed significant risk of ccRCC development and the overall survival
in patients with ccRCC. This interaction is summarized in Figure 2.
Jerotic Dj et al. reported in an experimental study a nowel mechanism of glutathione
S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) downregulation influence on increased oxidative stress and
inflammation in endothelial cells in uremic conditions. The also reported that the
deletion polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1), a phase II detoxification
and antioxidant enzyme, increased susceptibility to end-stage renal disease (ESRD),
as well as the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among ESRD patients and
their shorter cardiovascular survival. When human umbilical vein endothelial cells
(HUVECs) were exposed to uremic serum, they exhibited impaired redox balance, associated
with enhanced lipid peroxidation and decreased antioxidant enzyme activities, expression
of a series of inflammatory cytokines including retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4),
regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), C-reactive
protein (CRP), angiogenin, dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1), and platelet factor 4 (PF4). In order
to obtain GSTM1-null genotype, with no GSTM1 protein expression, HUVECs were transfected
with GSTM1 small interfering RNA (siRNA). The authors documented that GSTM1-null genotype
exposed to uremic serum led to the upregulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
(MCP-1), intracellular and vascular cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 and VCAM-1). Very
interesting was the finding on the increased levels of serum ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (sICAM-1
and sVCAM-1) in ESRD patients lacking GSTM1, in comparison with patients with the
GSTM1-active genotype. A novel function of endothelial GSTM1 in the regulation of
monocyte migration and adhesion, through its role in the upregulation of MCP-1, might
be relevant as a potential therapy target.
In summary, this special issue is compatible and consistent with the research topic
requirements, delineated in the aim and description proposed for this special issue:
to perform translational studies focused on specific external exposures (viruses COVID-19
and HCV), by using human blood samples
to create in vivo experimental animal models for the examination of the role of free
radical-induced chronic diseases in relation to proteome and lipidome signature (NAFLD)
to perform in vitro cell culture models to explore a role of free radicals in chronic
diseases (HUVEC)
to identify and characterize potential cell signaling pathways sensing specific external
exposures and body-related internal exposome in chronic disease and tumor development
(ccRCC and cardiometabolic syndrome)
to identify and characterize the novel regulatory pathways connecting redox-sensitive
signaling enzymes to cell transcriptome and proteome and small interfering RNA silencing
connection with redox enzymes (GSTM1-null genotype)