For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
6
views
19
references
 Top references
cited by
9
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      486
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Budesonide versus systemic corticosteroids in IgA Nephropathy : A retrospective, propensity-matched comparison

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) is characterized by mesangial deposition of dominant, polymeric, galactose-deficient IgA1 molecules of gut-associated lymphoid tissue origin. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of targeting the mucosal immune system dysregulation underlying IgAN pathogenesis with a pH-modified formulation of budesonide with a maximum release of active compound in the distal ileum and proximal colon.

          We did a retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of budesonide (Budenofalk) in the treatment of IgAN. From a retrospective cohort of 143 patients with IgAN followed in our department we identified 21 patients that received treatment with budesonide. These patients received budesonide at a dose of 9 mg/d in the first 12 months, followed by a dose reduction to 3 mg/d for the subsequent period. Only patients that received a 24-month treatment with budesonide were included in the analysis (n = 18). We matched the budesonide-treated cohort to 18 patients with IgAN treated with systemic steroids from the same retrospective cohort. Efficacy was measured as change in proteinuria, hematuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate over a 24-month period.

          Treatment with budesonide was associated with a 24-month renal function decline of -0.22 (95%CI, -8.2 to 7.8) ml/min/1.73m 2, compared to -5.89 (95%CI, -12.2 to 0.4) ml/min/1.73m 2 in the corticosteroid treatment group (p = 0.44, for between group difference). The median reduction in proteinuria at 24-month was 45% (interquartile range [IQR]: -79%; -22%) in the budesonide group and 11% (IQR: -39%; 43%) in the corticosteroid group, respectively ( P = .009, for between group difference). The median reduction in hematuria at 24-month was 72% (IQR: -90%; -45%) in the budesonide group and 73% (IQR: -85%; 18%) in the corticosteroid group, respectively ( P = .22, for between group difference). Treatment with budesonide was well tolerated with minimal side effects.

          Budesonide (Budenofalk) was effective in the treatment of patients with IgAN at high-risk of progression in terms of reducing proteinuria, hematuria and preserving renal function over 24 months of therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Change in Albuminuria and GFR as End Points for Clinical Trials in Early Stages of CKD: A Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation in Collaboration With the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency

          Andrew Levey, Ron T. Gansevoort, Josef Coresh … (2019)
          The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) are currently willing to consider a 30% to 40% glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline as a surrogate end point for kidney failure for clinical trials of kidney disease progression under appropriate conditions. However, these end points may not be practical for early stages of kidney disease. In March 2018, the National Kidney Foundation sponsored a scientific workshop in collaboration with the FDA and EMA to evaluate changes in albuminuria or GFR as candidate surrogate end points. Three parallel efforts were presented: meta-analyses of observational studies (cohorts), meta-analyses of clinical trials, and simulations of trial design. In cohorts, after accounting for measurement error, relationships between change in urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) or estimated GFR (eGFR) slope and the clinical outcome of kidney disease progression were strong and consistent. In trials, the posterior median R2 of treatment effects on the candidate surrogates with the clinical outcome was 0.47 (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI], 0.02-0.96) for early change in UACR and 0.72 (95% BCI, 0.05-0.99) when restricted to baseline UACR>30mg/g, and 0.97 (95% BCI, 0.78-1.00) for total eGFR slope at 3 years and 0.96 (95% BCI, 0.63-1.00) for chronic eGFR slope (ie, the slope excluding the first 3 months from baseline, when there might be acute changes in eGFR). The magnitude of the relationships of changes in the candidate surrogates with risk for clinical outcome was consistent across cohorts and trials: a UACR reduction of 30% or eGFR slope reduction by 0.5 to 1.0mL/min/1.73m2 per year were associated with an HR of ∼0.7 for the clinical outcome in cohorts and trials. In simulations, using GFR slope as an end point substantially reduced the required sample size and duration of follow-up compared with the clinical end point when baseline eGFR was high, treatment effects were uniform, and there was no acute effect of the treatment. We conclude that both early change in albuminuria and GFR slope fulfill criteria for surrogacy for use as end points in clinical trials for chronic kidney disease progression under certain conditions, with stronger support for change in GFR than albuminuria. Implementation requires understanding conditions under which each surrogate is likely to perform well and restricting its use to those settings.
          Article 0 comments Cited 187 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating a New International Risk-Prediction Tool in IgA Nephropathy

            Sean Barbour, Rosanna Coppo, Hong. Zhang … (2019)
            This modeling study uses international, multi-ethnic derivation and validation cohorts of patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy to evaluate a risk-prediction tool for 50% decline in kidney function or end-stage renal disease. How can we better predict, at the time of kidney biopsy, the risk of a 50% decline in kidney function or end-stage renal disease in patients with IgA nephropathy? Large international multiethnic cohorts including 3927 patients were enrolled to both derive and externally validate 2 prediction models, one that included patient race/ethnicity, and one that did not. Both models outperformed clinical measures for prediction of kidney disease progression and patient risk stratification. The 2 prediction models were shown to be accurate and validated methods to help clinicians improve management and treatment of IgA nephropathy in multi-ethnic cohorts and may aid international researchers in trial recruitment. Although IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common glomerulonephritis in the world, there is no validated tool to predict disease progression. This limits patient-specific risk stratification and treatment decisions, clinical trial recruitment, and biomarker validation. To derive and externally validate a prediction model for disease progression in IgAN that can be applied at the time of kidney biopsy in multiple ethnic groups worldwide. We derived and externally validated a prediction model using clinical and histologic risk factors that are readily available in clinical practice. Large, multi-ethnic cohorts of adults with biopsy-proven IgAN were included from Europe, North America, China, and Japan. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the risk of a 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage kidney disease, and were evaluated using the R 2 D measure, Akaike information criterion (AIC), C statistic, continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and calibration plots. The study included 3927 patients; mean age, 35.4 (interquartile range, 28.0-45.4) years; and 2173 (55.3%) were men. The following prediction models were created in a derivation cohort of 2781 patients: a clinical model that included eGFR, blood pressure, and proteinuria at biopsy; and 2 full models that also contained the MEST histologic score, age, medication use, and either racial/ethnic characteristics (white, Japanese, or Chinese) or no racial/ethnic characteristics, to allow application in other ethnic groups. Compared with the clinical model, the full models with and without race/ethnicity had better R 2 D (26.3% and 25.3%, respectively, vs 20.3%) and AIC (6338 and 6379, respectively, vs 6485), significant increases in C statistic from 0.78 to 0.82 and 0.81, respectively (ΔC, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03-0.04 and ΔC, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.03, respectively), and significant improvement in reclassification as assessed by the NRI (0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.29 and 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62, respectively) and IDI (0.07; 95% CI, 0.06-0.08 and 0.06; 95% CI, 0.05-0.06, respectively). External validation was performed in a cohort of 1146 patients. For both full models, the C statistics (0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83 with race/ethnicity; 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82 without race/ethnicity) and R 2 D (both 35.3%) were similar or better than in the validation cohort, with excellent calibration. In this study, the 2 full prediction models were shown to be accurate and validated methods for predicting disease progression and patient risk stratification in IgAN in multi-ethnic cohorts, with additional applications to clinical trial design and biomarker research.
            Article 0 comments Cited 148 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomized controlled clinical trial of corticosteroids plus ACE-inhibitors with long-term follow-up in proteinuric IgA nephropathy.

              Francesco Paolo Schena, D. Torres-Lagares, Carlo Manno … (2009)
              Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common cause of chronic renal failure among primary glomerulonephritis patients. The best treatment for IgAN remains poorly defined. We planned a long-term, prospective, open-label, multicentre, centrally randomized controlled trial to assess whether the combination of prednisone and ramipril was more effective than ramipril alone in patients with proteinuric IgAN. Ninety-seven biopsy-proven IgAN patients with moderate histologic lesions, 24-h proteinuria > or =1.0 g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > or = 50 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2) were randomly allocated to receive a 6-month course of oral prednisone plus ramipril (combination therapy group) or ramipril alone (monotherapy group) for the total duration of follow-up. The primary outcome was the progression of renal disease defined as the combination of doubling of baseline serum creatinine or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The secondary outcomes were the rate of renal function decline defined as the eGFR slope over time, and the reduction of 24-h proteinuria. After a follow-up of up to 96 months, 13/49 (26.5%) patients in the monotherapy group reached the primary outcome compared with 2/48 (4.2%) in the combination therapy group. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher probability of not reaching the combined outcome in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (85.2% versus 52.1%; log-rank test P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, baseline serum creatinine and 24-h proteinuria were independent predictors of the risk of primary outcome; treatment with prednisone plus ramipril significantly reduced the risk of renal disease progression (hazard ratio 0.13; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.61; P = 0.01). The mean rate of eGFR decline was higher in the monotherapy group than in the combination therapy group (-6.17 +/- 13.3 versus -0.56 +/- 7.62 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2)/year; P = 0.013). Moreover, the combined treatment reduced 24-h proteinuria more than ramipril alone during the first 2 years. Our results suggest that the combination of corticosteroids and ramipril may provide additional benefits compared with ramipril alone in preventing the progression of renal disease in proteinuric IgAN patients in the long-term follow-up.
              Article 0 comments Cited 95 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Medicine (Baltimore)
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Medicine (Baltimore)
                Journal ID (publisher-id): MEDI
                Title: Medicine
                Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health
                ISSN (Print): 0025-7974
                ISSN (Electronic): 1536-5964
                Publication date Collection: 26 June 2020
                Publication date (Electronic): 26 June 2020
                Volume: 99
                Issue: 26
                Electronic Location Identifier: e21000
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Nephrology, Fundeni Clinical Institute
                [b ]Department of Uronephrology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy
                [c ]Center of Uronephrology and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
                Author notes
                [∗ ]Correspondence: Bogdan Obrişcă, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Bucharest Romania (e-mail: obriscabogdan@ 123456yahoo.com ).
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4796-4950
                Article
                Publisher ID: MD-D-20-00844 Accession ID: 21000
                DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021000
                PMC ID: 7329020
                PubMed ID: 32590815
                SO-VID: 63929abd-32c7-4b0e-846f-be4ee72120b9
                Copyright © Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
                License:

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

                History
                Date received : 30 January 2020
                Date revision received : 9 May 2020
                Date accepted : 29 May 2020
                Categories
                Subject: 5200
                Subject: Research Article
                Subject: Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                OPEN-ACCESS TRUE

                Keywords: budesonide,corticosteroids,iga nephropathy,immunosuppression
                Data availability:
                Keywords: budesonide, corticosteroids, iga nephropathy, immunosuppression

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content486

                See all similar

                Cited by9

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors410

                See all reference authors