30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploratory Study to Identify Radiomics Classifiers for Lung Cancer Histology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Radiomics can quantify tumor phenotypic characteristics non-invasively by applying feature algorithms to medical imaging data. In this study of lung cancer patients, we investigated the association between radiomic features and the tumor histologic subtypes (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma). Furthermore, in order to predict histologic subtypes, we employed machine-learning methods and independently evaluated their prediction performance.

          Methods

          Two independent radiomic cohorts with a combined size of 350 patients were included in our analysis. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from the segmented tumor volumes of pretreatment CT images. These radiomic features quantify tumor phenotypic characteristics on medical images using tumor shape and size, intensity statistics, and texture. Univariate analysis was performed to assess each feature’s association with the histological subtypes. In our multivariate analysis, we investigated 24 feature selection methods and 3 classification methods for histology prediction. Multivariate models were trained on the training cohort and their performance was evaluated on the independent validation cohort using the area under ROC curve (AUC). Histology was determined from surgical specimen.

          Results

          In our univariate analysis, we observed that fifty-three radiomic features were significantly associated with tumor histology. In multivariate analysis, feature selection methods ReliefF and its variants showed higher prediction accuracy as compared to other methods. We found that Naive Baye’s classifier outperforms other classifiers and achieved the highest AUC (0.72; p-value = 2.3 × 10 −7) with five features: Stats_min, Wavelet_HLL_rlgl_lowGrayLevelRunEmphasis, Wavelet_HHL_stats_median, Wavelet_HLL_stats_skewness, and Wavelet_HLH_glcm_clusShade.

          Conclusion

          Histological subtypes can influence the choice of a treatment/therapy for lung cancer patients. We observed that radiomic features show significant association with the lung tumor histology. Moreover, radiomics-based multivariate classifiers were independently validated for the prediction of histological subtypes. Despite achieving lower than optimal prediction accuracy (AUC 0.72), our analysis highlights the impressive potential of non-invasive and cost-effective radiomics for precision medicine. Further research in this direction could lead us to optimal performance and therefore to clinical applicability, which could enhance the efficiency and efficacy of cancer care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

          A representation and interpretation of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve obtained by the "rating" method, or by mathematical predictions based on patient characteristics, is presented. It is shown that in such a setting the area represents the probability that a randomly chosen diseased subject is (correctly) rated or ranked with greater suspicion than a randomly chosen non-diseased subject. Moreover, this probability of a correct ranking is the same quantity that is estimated by the already well-studied nonparametric Wilcoxon statistic. These two relationships are exploited to (a) provide rapid closed-form expressions for the approximate magnitude of the sampling variability, i.e., standard error that one uses to accompany the area under a smoothed ROC curve, (b) guide in determining the size of the sample required to provide a sufficiently reliable estimate of this area, and (c) determine how large sample sizes should be to ensure that one can statistically detect differences in the accuracy of diagnostic techniques.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses.

            We have generated a molecular taxonomy of lung carcinoma, the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide. Using oligonucleotide microarrays, we analyzed mRNA expression levels corresponding to 12,600 transcript sequences in 186 lung tumor samples, including 139 adenocarcinomas resected from the lung. Hierarchical and probabilistic clustering of expression data defined distinct subclasses of lung adenocarcinoma. Among these were tumors with high relative expression of neuroendocrine genes and of type II pneumocyte genes, respectively. Retrospective analysis revealed a less favorable outcome for the adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine gene expression. The diagnostic potential of expression profiling is emphasized by its ability to discriminate primary lung adenocarcinomas from metastases of extra-pulmonary origin. These results suggest that integration of expression profile data with clinical parameters could aid in diagnosis of lung cancer patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features.

              The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of interscanner variability in CT image radiomics studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                30 March 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 71
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
                [2] 2Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA
                [3] 3Department of Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
                [4] 4Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University , Maastricht, Netherlands
                [5] 5Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, USA
                [6] 6Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Issam El Naqa, McGill University, Canada

                Reviewed by: Joshua Silverman, New York University Medical Center, USA; Derek Merck, Rhode Island Hospital, USA

                *Correspondence: Weimiao Wu, weimiao.wu@ 123456mail.harvard.edu ; Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, hugo@ 123456jimmy.harvard.edu

                Weimiao Wu and Chintan Parmar contributed equally.

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2016.00071
                4811956
                27064691
                63987220-eb6f-411d-9c5b-3efacebd85eb
                Copyright © 2016 Wu, Parmar, Grossmann, Quackenbush, Lambin, Bussink, Mak and Aerts.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 November 2015
                : 14 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 1, References: 63, Pages: 11, Words: 6877
                Funding
                Funded by: Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 10.13039/501100003958
                Award ID: 10696 DuCAT
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme 10.13039/501100004963
                Award ID: ARTFORCE - no 257144, REQUITE - no 601826
                Funded by: European Commission 10.13039/501100000780
                Award ID: EU proposal 673780 - RAIL, BD2decide, no 210274050
                Funded by: KWF Kankerbestrijding 10.13039/501100004622
                Award ID: DESIGN
                Funded by: Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000009
                Award ID: NIH-USA U24CA194354, NIH-USA U01CA190234
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                quantitative imaging,radiomics,lung cancer histology,computational science,feature selection

                Comments

                Comment on this article