Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Ivabradine as an Alternative Therapeutic Trial in the Therapy of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inappropriate sinus tachycardia is a disease which is relatively rarely found and sometimes difficult to treat. Up to now it has been mostly treated with a β-blocker or verapamil. If this did not work sinus node modulation was considered. Since the relatively new selective IF-stream blocker ivabradine has been approved for the therapy of chronic stable angina pectoris, a new therapeutic option is available. As ivabradine is well tolerated and only few side effects are known, it may become a new therapeutic step between medication and the invasive sinus node modulation. We report the case of a young female patient with inappropriate sinus tachycardia where a sustained therapeutic success was achieved with ivabradine medication as an alternative therapeutic trial after various ineffective medications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antianginal and Antiischemic Effects of Ivabradine, an I f Inhibitor, in Stable Angina: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicentered, Placebo-Controlled Trial

          Heart rate reduction should benefit patients with chronic stable angina by improving myocardial perfusion and reducing myocardial oxygen demand. This study evaluated the antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, a new heart rate-lowering agent that acts specifically on the sinoatrial node. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 360 patients with a > or =3-month history of chronic stable angina were randomly assigned to receive ivabradine (2.5, 5, or 10 mg BID) or placebo for 2 weeks, followed by an open-label 2- or 3-month extension on ivabradine (10 mg BID) and a 1-week randomized withdrawal to ivabradine (10 mg BID) or placebo. Primary efficacy criteria were changes in time to 1-mm ST-segment depression and time to limiting angina during bicycle exercise (exercise tolerance tests), performed at trough of drug activity. In the per-protocol population (n=257), time to 1-mm ST-segment depression increased in the 5 and 10 mg BID groups (P<0.005); time to limiting angina increased in the 10 mg BID group (P<0.05). Deterioration in all exercise tolerance test parameters occurred in patients who received placebo during randomized withdrawal (all P<0.02) but not in those still receiving ivabradine. No rebound phenomena were observed on treatment cessation. Ivabradine produces dose-dependent improvements in exercise tolerance and time to development of ischemia during exercise. These results suggest that ivabradine, representing a novel class of antianginal drugs, is effective and safe during 3 months of use; longer-term safety requires additional assessment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Left ventricular muscle mass and elevated heart rate are associated with coronary plaque disruption.

            Plaque disruption is the central pathophysiological mechanism underlying acute coronary syndromes and the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. There exists only scant information about the factors that are associated with its development. The aim of the current study was to analyze the contribution of hemodynamic forces in the pathogenesis of plaque disruption. Plaque disruption was diagnosed by coronary angiography of stenosed but not completely occluded coronary arteries. This study retrospectively analyzed 106 patients who underwent 2 coronary angiography procedures within 6 months. We investigated 53 patients with initially smooth stenoses who developed plaque disruption by the time of the second coronary angiogram and compared these patients with 53 age- and sex-matched individuals with smooth stenoses without angiographic signs of plaque disruption. The 2 groups were compared by analyzing central hemodynamics, echocardiographic measurements, and cardiovascular medication use. Logistic regression analysis identified positive associations between plaque disruption, left ventricular muscle mass >270 g, and a mean heart rate >80 bpm and a negative association with the use of beta-blockers. The associations documented by our investigation indicate that hemodynamic forces may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of plaque disruption. These findings may help to identify patients who are at an increased risk of plaque disruption and who might gain benefit from pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing heart rate, for example, by the use of beta-blockers, or a reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence, characteristics and natural course of inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

              To study the prevalence, characteristics and natural course of inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CRD
                Cardiology
                10.1159/issn.0008-6312
                Cardiology
                S. Karger AG
                0008-6312
                1421-9751
                2008
                June 2008
                04 December 2007
                : 110
                : 3
                : 206-208
                Affiliations
                Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
                Article
                111931 Cardiology 2008;110:206–208
                10.1159/000111931
                18057886
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 2, References: 8, Pages: 3
                Categories
                Novel Insights from Clinical Experience

                Comments

                Comment on this article