13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systemic Therapy of Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Single Center Experience from a Cohort of 110 Consecutive Cases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs) represent a rare and biologically heterogeneous group of malignancies. Treatment of NEN patients remains challenging due to lack of prospective evidence on the choice of ideal therapeutic sequence and therapeutic efficacy in specific individual scenarios.

          Methods

          Clinical data on 110 consecutive patients suffering from NEN treated at a single German university center were analyzed, therapeutic regimens applied were assessed, and the outcome was evaluated.

          Results

          Histological grading, Ki67 proliferation index, functional activity, and presence of metastases were identified as prognostic markers. 10-year overall survival rates were 92%, 44%, and 0% for G1, G2, and G3 tumors, and 60%, 39%, 69%, 53%, and 0% for Ki67 <2%, 3–5%, 6–20%, 21–49%, and >50%, respectively. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and cytostatic chemotherapy were the second most common options, with PRRT being used more frequently in NET G1 and G2 and chemotherapy in NEC G3. Combination chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin or carboplatin showed disease control rates (DCRs) of overall 74%, with a short median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 or 5 months, respectively. DCR and PFS for PRRT were 89% and 22 months when administered as monotherapy, versus 100% and 27 months upon combination with somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy. Of note, PRRT also achieved disease control as best response in 5/5 (100%) selected cases of NEC G3.

          Conclusion

          Further prospective studies are warranted to help stratify available options for therapeutic intervention in NEN patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

          Somatostatin analogues are commonly used to treat symptoms associated with hormone hypersecretion in neuroendocrine tumors; however, data on their antitumor effects are limited. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide in patients with advanced, well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, nonfunctioning, somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors of grade 1 or 2 (a tumor proliferation index [on staining for the Ki-67 antigen] of <10%) and documented disease-progression status. The tumors originated in the pancreas, midgut, or hindgut or were of unknown origin. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an extended-release aqueous-gel formulation of lanreotide (Autogel [known in the United States as Depot], Ipsen) at a dose of 120 mg (101 patients) or placebo (103 patients) once every 28 days for 96 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival, defined as the time to disease progression (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0) or death. Secondary end points included overall survival, quality of life (assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-GI.NET21), and safety. Most patients (96%) had no tumor progression in the 3 to 6 months before randomization, and 33% had hepatic tumor volumes greater than 25%. Lanreotide, as compared with placebo, was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (median not reached vs. median of 18.0 months, P<0.001 by the stratified log-rank test; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.73). The estimated rates of progression-free survival at 24 months were 65.1% (95% CI, 54.0 to 74.1) in the lanreotide group and 33.0% (95% CI, 23.0 to 43.3) in the placebo group. The therapeutic effect in predefined subgroups was generally consistent with that in the overall population, with the exception of small subgroups in which confidence intervals were wide. There were no significant between-group differences in quality of life or overall survival. The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (in 26% of the patients in the lanreotide group and 9% of those in the placebo group). Lanreotide was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival among patients with metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors of grade 1 or 2 (Ki-67 <10%). (Funded by Ipsen; CLARINET ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00353496; EudraCT 2005-004904-35.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Distant Metastatic Disease of Intestinal, Pancreatic, Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of Unknown Primary Site

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              ENETS Consensus Guidelines for High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Endocrinol
                Int J Endocrinol
                IJE
                International Journal of Endocrinology
                Hindawi
                1687-8337
                1687-8345
                2020
                31 January 2020
                : 2020
                : 1491475
                Affiliations
                1Department of Internal Medicine 3, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Duesseldorf, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Duesseldorf, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                3Department of Internal Medicine 1, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Duesseldorf, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                4Department of Surgery, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Duesseldorf, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Basilio Pintaudi

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-2184
                Article
                10.1155/2020/1491475
                7013359
                63c71c16-9d96-4aba-94a9-e70c428741bf
                Copyright © 2020 Karin Mayer et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 September 2019
                : 16 December 2019
                : 26 December 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
                Funded by: H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
                Award ID: 671881
                Categories
                Research Article

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article