7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials in response to repetitive painful chemical stimulation of the nasal mucosa.

      Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology
      Adult, Carbon Dioxide, pharmacology, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, drug effects, Female, Humans, Male, Nasal Mucosa, physiopathology, Pain, chemically induced

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of the study was to investigate how chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials (CSSERPs) and pain ratings are modified by repetitive painful stimulation of the nasal mucosa (58% v/v CO2, 200 msec duration). Twenty-two subjects performed 3 experiments during which trains of stimuli were applied. The interstimulus interval (ISI) between stimuli was constant for each experiment, but varied between experiments (8, 4, and 2 sec). CSSERPs were obtained from 5 positions (Fz, C3, Cz, C4, and Pz). The subjects not only rated the overall perceived intensities but also reported the quality of the stimuli. At an ISI of 8 sec estimates decreased and only stinging sensations were reported. In contrast, at an interval of 2 sec estimates increased being accompanied by the buildup of burning pain. This phenomenon was interpreted in terms of the superposition of first (sharp and stinging pain: A delta fibers) and second pain (dull and burning pain: C fibers), respectively. However, given the special circumstances of short ISIs CSSERP amplitudes decreased the more the shorter the ISI was. In line with previous investigations it is hypothesised that CSSERPs predominantly reflect nociceptive information transmitted via A delta fibers.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article