Dear editor
A single trial, ISIS-2,1 in 1988, demonstrated the utility of daily aspirin in the
setting of acute myocardial infarction, reducing the risk of vascular death by 23%.
In addition, aspirin has also proven effective in the setting of acute ischemic stroke.2
Thus, for a subset of the general population, aspirin may help to prevent heart attacks
and strokes. In fact, at low doses, in the range of 75 to 100 mg per day, aspirin
prevents the progression of existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary
heart disease, stroke and peripheral arterial disease, and reduces the frequency of
cardiovascular events in patients with history of CVD,3,4 referred to as secondary
prevention. Although the benefits of aspirin for secondary prevention of CVD are well
known, its use in primary prevention of CVD, defined as prevention of the first occurrence
of CVD for all patients without clinical CVD, including those with diabetes mellitus
and those without clinical evidence of atherosclerotic disease who are at higher CVD
risk, is less clear and controversial results have been obtained. In fact, the results
of several studies using aspirin for primary prevention of CVD have generally shown
more modest reductions of major vascular events compared with secondary prevention
(12% vs 23%).3,5
In this regard, the health study of women,6 the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT)
study,7,8 the primary prevention project,9,10 the health study research group,11 the
British doctors’ trial,12 and the thrombosis prevention trial,13 indicate that aspirin
therapy is associated with a significant reduction of 19% in the risk of stroke and
no reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction in women; and a significant reduction
of 32% in the risk of myocardial infarction and a non-significant increase in the
risk of stroke in men. However, in all cases, aspirin significantly increased the
risk of bleeding, as the main important side effect.14
In this context, because fatal and non-fatal thrombotic events (eg, stroke and/or
myocardial infarction events) are usually prevented by aspirin, in an order of magnitude
lower than in secondary prevention, and overall risk for bleeding events (eg, intracranial
and/or subarachnoid hemorrhage events) are generally increased by aspirin, in an order
of magnitude equal to secondary prevention, aspirin appears to offer little benefit
for the primary prevention of CVD.
Moreover, in the vast majority of primary prevention studies, the overall risk level
for CVD events was very low5 and the events rate was much lower than expected, leading
to studies with less power to detect differences in the primary prevention of CVD.
In addition to this, it must add a greater use in general population of preventive
medications for different atherosclerotic risk factors, such as antihypertensive and
lipid-lowering drugs, and other preventive measures, which together result in fewer
events than expected.15
Accordingly, it was more difficult to achieve an overall risk reduction of cardiovascular
events than in secondary prevention,2,3,5 and most studies concluded that low-dose
aspirin does not significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, non-fatal
stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or non-fatal myocardial infarction in subjects without
prior CVD.16
Thus, using aspirin, in a cost-effective manner and with a good risk–benefit balance,
for primary prevention of CVD, we must consider that patients are affected by different
atherosclerotic risk factors (eg, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus)
and, therefore, the preventive effects of aspirin on CVD will be heterogeneous. So,
it will be necessary to study these preventive effects, for each type of individual
cardiovascular event (eg, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial
infarction) among the different subgroups of patients, stratified according to cardiovascular
risk factors studied, eg, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, sex, age,
smoking, family history of premature CVD, blood pressure (<120/75 mmHg, 120–129/75–84
mmHg, 130–139/85–89 mmHg, and $140/$90 mmHg), body mass index (<25.0, 25.0–29.9, and
$30.0) and/or 10-year cardiovascular risk of 6%–10%.16 This would be the case for
the following ongoing clinical trials: the ASCEND study, involving aspirin for patients
40 years and older with type 1 or type 2 diabetes;17 the ARRIVE study, testing aspirin
in middle aged and older patients who are at moderate risk based on the presence of
multiple risk factors for CVD;18 and the ASPREE study, testing aspirin in individuals
older than 70 years.19
With these data, it will be possible to demonstrate the presence or absence of a preventive
effect of low-dose aspirin and, consequently, the benefit of aspirin treatment for
primary prevention in certain types of patients. However, so long as clinical trials
are conducted and until completion, the use of aspirin for primary prevention of CVD
should target patients at high cardiovascular risk: physicians should evaluate the
risks and benefits of aspirin therapy for primary prevention and incorporate patient
preferences.