Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

Methods to Evaluate Lifecycle Models for Research Data Management

Preprint

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Lifecycle models for research data are often abstract and simple. This comes at the danger of oversimplifying the complex concepts of research data management. The analysis of 90 different lifecycle models lead to two approaches to assess the quality of these models. While terminological issues make direct comparisons of models hard, an empirical evaluation seems possible.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 8

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Social commerce Looking back and forward

        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: found
        • Article: found
        Is Open Access

        Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review

        Objective The purpose of this study is to describe the volume, topics, and methodological nature of the existing research literature on research data management in academic institutions. Materials and methods We conducted a scoping review by searching forty literature databases encompassing a broad range of disciplines from inception to April 2016. We included all study types and data extracted on study design, discipline, data collection tools, and phase of the research data lifecycle. Results We included 301 articles plus 10 companion reports after screening 13,002 titles and abstracts and 654 full-text articles. Most articles (85%) were published from 2010 onwards and conducted within the sciences (86%). More than three-quarters of the articles (78%) reported methods that included interviews, cross-sectional, or case studies. Most articles (68%) included the Giving Access to Data phase of the UK Data Archive Research Data Lifecycle that examines activities such as sharing data. When studies were grouped into five dominant groupings (Stakeholder, Data, Library, Tool/Device, and Publication), data quality emerged as an integral element. Conclusion Most studies relied on self-reports (interviews, surveys) or accounts from an observer (case studies) and we found few studies that collected empirical evidence on activities amongst data producers, particularly those examining the impact of research data management interventions. As well, fewer studies examined research data management at the early phases of research projects. The quality of all research outputs needs attention, from the application of best practices in research data management studies, to data producers depositing data in repositories for long-term use.
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Introduction

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            31 January 2019
            1901.11267 10.1515/dmpt-2016-00

            http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Custom metadata
            cs.DL

            Information & Library science

            Comments

            Comment on this article