2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recurrent PSC in the A2ALL Study: Comparison of Risk Factors Between Living and Deceased Donor Recipients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) recurs in 15%–25% of patients transplanted for PSC. In the United States, PSC transplant patients are more likely to receive an organ from a living donor (LD) than patients without PSC. Our aims were to: 1) compare risk of PSC recurrence in LD versus deceased donor (DD) recipients; and 2) identify risk factors for PSC recurrence.

          Methods

          241 LD liver transplant (LT) and 65 DDLT subjects transplanted between 1998 and 2013 enrolled in the Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study were evaluated. PSC recurrence risk for LDLT and DDLT recipients was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test. Cox models were used to evaluate PSC Risk factors.

          Results

          Overall PSC recurrence probabilities were 8.7% and 22.4% at 5 and 10 years post-LT, respectively. The risk of PSC recurrence was not significantly different for DDLT versus LDLT recipients (p=0.36). For DDLT versus LDLT recipients, unadjusted 5- and 10-year PSC recurrence was 9.4% versus 9.5% and 36.9% versus 21.1%. Higher lab Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) at LT, onset of a biliary complication, cholangiocarcinoma, and higher donor age were associated with increased risk of PSC recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]=1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.10 per MELD point, p=0.002; HR=2.82, CI 1.28–6.25 for biliary complication, p=0.01; HR=3.98, CI 1.43–11.09 for cholangiocarcinoma, p=0.008; HR=1.17, CI 1.02–1.35 per 5-years donor age, p=0.02). Factors not significantly associated with PSC recurrence: First-degree relative donor (p=0.11), post-LT cytomegalovirus infection (p=0.29), and acute rejection (p=0.37).

          Conclusion

          Risk of recurrent PSC was not significantly different for DDLT and LDLT recipients. Biliary complications, cholangiocarcinoma, MELD, and donor age were significantly associated with risk of PSC recurrence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          100909185
          21611
          Liver Transpl
          Liver Transpl.
          Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
          1527-6465
          1527-6473
          7 July 2016
          2 August 2016
          September 2016
          01 September 2017
          : 22
          : 9
          : 1214-1222
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA
          [2 ]University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
          [3 ]Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
          [4 ]University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
          [5 ]Columbia University, New York, NY
          [6 ]University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
          [7 ]Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Fredric D. Gordon; Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, 41 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01803; 781-744-5330; FAX 781-744-5743; fredric_d_gordon@ 123456lahey.org
          Article
          PMC4996691 PMC4996691 4996691 nihpa797864
          10.1002/lt.24496
          4996691
          27339253
          63fe8112-1e8a-409e-8bd8-34885a356924
          History
          Categories
          Article

          living donor liver transplant,biliary complications,cholangiocarcinoma,MELD,end-stage liver disease

          Comments

          Comment on this article