26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment

      , ,
      Clinical Psychology Review
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis.

          Conventional reviews of research on the efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatments often find considerable variation in outcome among studies and, as a consequence, fail to reach firm conclusions about the overall effectiveness of the interventions in question. In contrast meta-analytic reviews show a strong, dramatic pattern of positive overall effects that cannot readily be explained as artifacts of meta-analytic technique or generalized placebo effects. Moreover, the effects are not so small that they can be dismissed as lacking practical or clinical significance. Although meta-analysis has limitations, there are good reasons to believe that its results are more credible than those of conventional reviews and to conclude that well-developed psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment is generally efficacious.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: a meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies.

            A meta-analysis of child and adolescent psychotherapy outcome research tested previous findings using a new sample of 150 outcome studies and weighted least squares methods. The overall mean effect of therapy was positive and highly significant. Effects were more positive for behavioral than for nonbehavioral treatments, and samples of adolescent girls showed better outcomes than other Age x Gender groups. Paraprofessionals produced larger overall treatment effects than professional therapists or students, but professionals produced larger effects than paraprofessionals in treating overcontrolled problems (e.g., anxiety and depression). Results supported the specificity of treatment effects: Outcomes were stronger for the particular problems targeted in treatment than for problems not targeted. The findings shed new light on previous results and raise significant issues for future study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners.

              An intensive community-based advocacy intervention was designed and evaluated by randomly assigning 278 battered women to an experimental or control condition. Participants were interviewed 6 times over a period of 2 years. Retention rate averaged 95% over the 2 years. The 10-week postshelter intervention involved providing trained advocates to work 1-on-1 with women, helping generate and access the community resources they needed to reduce their risk of future violence from their abusive partners. Women who worked with advocates experienced less violence over time, reported higher quality of life and social support, and had less difficulty obtaining community resources. More than twice as many women receiving advocacy services experienced no violence across the 2 years postintervention compared with women who did not receive such services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinical Psychology Review
                Clinical Psychology Review
                Elsevier BV
                02727358
                January 2004
                January 2004
                : 23
                : 8
                : 1023-1053
                Article
                10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
                14729422
                6454ada8-3d6d-41fa-b80c-6558d516c443
                © 2004

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article