Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Mitochondrial DNA sequences from dried snake venom: a DNA barcoding approach to the identification of venom samples.

Toxicon

Species Specificity, genetics, analysis, Snake Venoms, RNA, Ribosomal, Phylogeny, DNA, Mitochondrial, Crotalus, Base Sequence, methods, Automatic Data Processing, Animals

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Outdated nomenclature and incorrect taxonomic characterisation of snake venoms in the current toxinological literature have serious implications for the replicability of results from snake venom toxin research. The situation has not improved, despite attempts to supply toxinologists with regular updates on snake systematics. Here, we demonstrate the successful extraction of DNA, and subsequent sequencing of the mitochondrial 12S gene, from dried snake venoms. This approach offers a new and potentially straightforward method for accurate species identification. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences isolated from snake venom can be used to clarify or validate snake species identification through comparison against existing sequences in the GenBank database, and through phylogenetic analyses with other sequences. Pooled venoms can also be screened a priori for the presence of multiple species, and the species names on the labels of commercial venoms verified. Moreover, if the species from which the venom sample has been taken is known, and the specimen is available as a voucher, the mtDNA sequence of the haplotype isolated from that species venom sample could serve as a sequence standard (or 'DNA barcode') for that species. Our new method of DNA barcoding venoms ensures the identification of venoms even after future taxonomic changes.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.07.005
      16157361

      Comments

      Comment on this article