18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The digestion rate of protein is an independent regulating factor of postprandial protein retention

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate the importance of protein digestion rate on protein deposition, we characterized leucine kinetics after ingestion of “protein” meals of identical amino acid composition and nitrogen contents but of different digestion rates. Four groups of five or six young men received anl-[1- 13C]leucine infusion and one of the following 30-g protein meals: a single meal of slowly digested casein (CAS), a single meal of free amino acid mimicking casein composition (AA), a single meal of rapidly digested whey proteins (WP), or repeated meals of whey proteins (RPT-WP) mimicking slow digestion rate. Comparisons were made between “fast” (AA, WP) and “slow” (CAS, RPT-WP) meals of identical amino acid composition (AA vs. CAS, and WP vs. RPT-WP). The fast meals induced a strong, rapid, and transient increase of aminoacidemia, leucine flux, and oxidation. After slow meals, these parameters increased moderately but durably. Postprandial leucine balance over 7 h was higher after the slow than after the fast meals (CAS: 38 ± 13 vs. AA: −12 ± 11, P < 0.01; RPT-WP: 87 ± 25 vs. WP: 6 ± 19 μmol/kg, P< 0.05). Protein digestion rate is an independent factor modulating postprandial protein deposition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Oral amino acids stimulate muscle protein anabolism in the elderly despite higher first-pass splanchnic extraction.

            Muscle protein synthesis and breakdown and amino acid transport were measured in 7 healthy young (30 +/- 2 yr) and 8 healthy elderly (71 +/- 2 yr) volunteers in the postabsorptive state and during the oral administration of an amino acid mixture with L-[ring-(2)H(5)]phenylalanine infusion, femoral artery and vein catheterization, and muscle biopsies. Phenylalanine first-pass splanchnic extraction was measured by adding L-[ring-(13)C(6)]phenylalanine to the mixture. In the postabsorptive state, no differences in muscle amino acid kinetics were detected between young and elderly volunteers. Phenylalanine first-pass splanchnic extraction was significantly higher in the elderly (P < 0. 003) during ingestion of amino acids, but the delivery to the leg increased to the same extent in both groups. Phenylalanine transport into the muscle, muscle protein synthesis, and net balance increased significantly (P < 0.01) and similarly in both the young and the elderly. We conclude that, despite an increased splanchnic first-pass extraction, muscle protein anabolism can be stimulated by oral amino acids in the elderly as well as in the young.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Protein pulse feeding improves protein retention in elderly women.

              Adequate protein nutrition could be used to limit gradual body protein loss and improve protein anabolism in the elderly. We tested the hypothesis that an uneven protein feeding pattern was more efficient in improving protein anabolism than was an even pattern. After a controlled period, 15 elderly women (mean age: 68 y) were fed for 14 d either a pulse diet (n = 7), providing 80% of the daily protein intake at 1200, or a spread diet (n = 8), in which the same daily protein intake was spread over 4 meals. Both diets provided 1.7 g protein x kg fat-free mass (FFM)(-1) x d(-1). Protein accretion and daily protein turnover were determined by using the nitrogen balance method and the end product method (ammonia and urea) after an oral dose of [15N]glycine. Nitrogen balance was more positive with the pulse than with the spread diet (54 +/- 7 compared with 27 +/- 6 mg N x kg FFM(-1) x d(-1); P < 0.05). Protein turnover rates were also higher with the pulse than with the spread diet (5.58 +/- 0.22 compared with 4.98 +/- 0.17 g protein x kg FFM(-1) x d(-1); P < 0.05), mainly because of higher protein synthesis in the pulse group (4.48 +/- 0.19 g protein x kg FFM(-1) x d(-1)) than in the spread group (3.75 +/- 0.19 g protein x kg FFM(-1) x d(-1)) (P < 0.05). A protein pulse-feeding pattern was more efficient than was a protein spread-feeding pattern in improving, after 14 d, whole-body protein retention in elderly women.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
                American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
                American Physiological Society
                0193-1849
                1522-1555
                February 01 2001
                February 01 2001
                : 280
                : 2
                : E340-E348
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratoire de Nutrition Humaine, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63009 Clermont-Ferrand;
                [2 ]Nestec, Nestlé Research Center, CH 1000 Lausanne 26 Switzerland
                [3 ]Laboratoire de Technologie Laitière, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 35042 Rennes, France; and
                Article
                10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.2.E340
                11158939
                647674fe-17df-476c-ba77-cd48455065e1
                © 2001
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article