9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Innovation to motivation—pilot study of a mobile phone intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary women

      , , ,
      Preventive Medicine
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This uncontrolled pilot study assessed changes in pedometer-measured step counts and self-reported physical activity during a 3-week mobile phone-based intervention. We also explored whether age, BMI, and psychosocial factors were associated with changes in step counts. Forty-one sedentary adult women in San Francisco, California were asked to report their pedometer steps using a study-supplied mobile phone from June to September 2008. In the second and third weeks, daily prompts delivered by the mobile phone encouraged participants to increase steps by 20% from the previous week. Mean age was 48 years. Average daily total steps increased by approximately 800 or 15% over three weeks (p<0.001). Lower BMI, no antidepressant use, and lower self-reported health status were associated with higher step counts at baseline. Improvements in self-reported will-power were associated with increases in step counts (p<0.001). Neither age (p=0.55) nor BMI (p=0.13) was significantly associated with changes in activity over the 3 weeks. The intervention appeared to motivate sedentary women to increase their physical activity. A randomized controlled clinical trial is warranted and feasible. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Preventive Medicine
          Preventive Medicine
          Elsevier BV
          00917435
          September 2010
          September 2010
          : 51
          : 3-4
          : 287-289
          Article
          10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.006
          2939294
          20600263
          64837666-ef00-427a-ac43-605dafec865f
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article