14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Measuring perceived benefit and disease-related burden in young cancer survivors: validation of the Benefit and Burden Scale for Children (BBSC) in the Netherlands

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Perceiving favourable changes from one’s illness may go hand in hand with experiencing harmful psychosocial effects. Each of these constructs should be considered when examining children’s levels of psychological adjustment following stressful life events. A paediatric instrument that accounts for both positive and negative impact of stressful events has not been investigated in the Netherlands before. The aim of the study was to investigate psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Benefit and Burden Scale for Children (BBSC), a 20-item questionnaire that intends to measure potential benefit and burden of illness in children.

          Methods

          Dutch paediatric survivors of childhood cancer aged 8–18 ( N = 77) completed the BBSC and other psychological questionnaires: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (health-related quality of life), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (anxiety), Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale (posttraumatic stress) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (behavioural functioning). Reliability and validity were evaluated.

          Results

          Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, benefit 0.84, burden 0.72), test–retest reliability (benefit r = 0.74, burden r = 0.78) and homogeneity (mean inter-item correlation, benefit r = 0.34, burden r = 0.22) were satisfactory. Burden was associated with HRQoL (−), anxiety (+), posttraumatic stress symptoms (+) and behavioural problems. Benefit did not correlate with the psychological outcomes.

          Conclusions

          The Dutch version of the BBSC shows promising psychometric properties. Perceived benefit and disease-related burden are distinct constructs; both should be considered when examining children’s psychological adjustment to potentially traumatic experiences. The BBSC may be useful as monitoring and screening instrument.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.

          This study was a first attempt to examine the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Dutch youths. A large sample of normal children and adolescents ( N = 562) and their parents completed the SDQ along with a number of other psychopathology measures. Factor analysis of the SDQ yielded five factors that were in keeping with the hypothesised subscales of hyperactivity-inattention, emotional symptoms, peer problems, conduct problems, and prosocial behaviour. Furthermore, internal consistency, test-retest stability, and parent-youth agreement of the various SDQ scales were acceptable. Finally, the concurrent validity of the SDQ was good: that is, its scores correlated in a theoretically meaningful way with other measures of psychopathology. It can be concluded that the psychometric properties of the parent- and self-report version of the SDQ were satisfactory in this Dutch community sample. Moreover, the current data provide further support for the utility of the SDQ as an index of psychopathological symptoms in youths.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quality of life, self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

            This study assessed quality of life, self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors of childhood cancer compared to a group of young adults with no history of cancer. The impact of demographic, medical and treatment factors and self-esteem on survivors' quality of life and worries was studied. Participants were 400 long-term survivors (LTS) of childhood cancer (age range 16-49 years, 45% female) who had completed treatment an average of 16 years previously and 560 persons (age range 16-53 years, 55% female) with no history of cancer. All participants completed the MOS-24 (Medical Outcome Study Scale), a Worry questionnaire consisting of three scales (cancer-specific concerns, general health concerns, present and future concerns), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Small to moderate differences were found in mean MOS-24 scores between the LTS group and controls (range effect sizes -0.36-0.22). No significant difference was found in the mean self-esteem scores between LTS and controls. Female LTS had more cancer-specific concerns than male LTS. In several related areas of general health, self-image and dying, the LTS group reported less worries than controls, but LTS worried significantly more about their fertility, getting/changing a job and obtaining insurance's. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that female gender, unemployment, severe late effects/health problems and a low self-esteem were predictors of worse quality of life in survivors. In addition, age at follow-up, unemployment, years since completion of therapy and a low self-esteem were associated with a higher degree of survivors' worries. Quality of life and the level of self-esteem in LTS of childhood cancer is not different from their peers. Although many LTS worried not more or even less about health issues than their peers, they often are concerned about some present and future concerns. The investigated factors could explain poor quality of life and worries only to a limited extent. Further research exploring determinants and indices of quality of life and worries in LTS is warranted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Body image and psychosocial adjustment in adolescent cancer survivors.

              Examined body image and social adjustment in 21 adolescents who had completed cancer treatment and a healthy comparison group. Subjects completed questionnaires assessing body image and social adjustment and were videotaped during an interview. Raters blind to health status independently rated subjects' attractiveness. Cancer survivors reported less than half as many social activities as the healthy controls. No group differences were found on social anxiety, loneliness, or composite body image scores. However, within the cancer group, adolescents who had been off treatment longer reported lower self-worth, more social anxiety, and more negative body image perceptions, but were not rated as less attractive by observers. Findings suggest body image concerns and social anxiety may not develop until several years after treatment termination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-20-5665674 , +31-20-6091242 , h.stam@amc.uva.nl
                Journal
                Support Care Cancer
                Supportive Care in Cancer
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0941-4355
                1433-7339
                11 June 2011
                11 June 2011
                August 2011
                : 19
                : 8
                : 1249-1253
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Paediatric Psychosocial Department, Emma Children’s Hospital Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Paediatric Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Behavioural Medicine, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
                [7 ]Paediatric Psychosocial Department, EKZ Academic Medical Centre, A3-241 Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                1206
                10.1007/s00520-011-1206-9
                3128272
                21667049
                648af03e-d08c-41ad-8204-1a3c96b0597c
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 15 February 2011
                : 30 May 2011
                Categories
                Short Communication
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2011

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                childhood cancer,instrument development,pediatric oncology,quality of life,psychosocial,survivor

                Comments

                Comment on this article