28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Internet has increasingly become a popular source of health information by connecting individuals with health content, experts, and support. More and more, individuals turn to social media and Internet sites to share health information and experiences. Although online health information seeking occurs worldwide, limited empirical studies exist examining cross-cultural differences in perceptions about user-generated, experience-based information compared to expertise-based information sources.

          Objective

          To investigate if cultural variations exist in patterns of online health information seeking, specifically in perceptions of online health information sources. It was hypothesized that Koreans and Hongkongers, compared to Americans, would be more likely to trust and use experience-based knowledge shared in social Internet sites, such as social media and online support groups. Conversely, Americans, compared to Koreans and Hongkongers, would value expertise-based knowledge prepared and approved by doctors or professional health providers more.

          Methods

          Survey questionnaires were developed in English first and then translated into Korean and Chinese. The back-translation method ensured the standardization of questions. Surveys were administered using a standardized recruitment strategy and data collection methods.

          Results

          A total of 826 participants living in metropolitan areas from the United States (n=301), Korea (n=179), and Hong Kong (n=337) participated in the study. We found significant cultural differences in information processing preferences for online health information. A planned contrast test revealed that Koreans and Hongkongers showed more trust in experience-based health information sources (blogs: t 451.50=11.21, P<.001; online support group: t 455.71=9.30, P<.001; social networking sites [SNS]: t 466.75=11.36, P<.001) and also reported using blogs ( t 515.31=6.67, P<.001) and SNS ( t 529.22=4.51, P<.001) more frequently than Americans. Americans showed a stronger preference for using expertise-based information sources (eg, WebMD and CDC) compared to Koreans and Hongkongers ( t 360.02=3.01, P=.003). Trust in expertise-based information sources was universal, demonstrating no cultural differences (Brown-Forsythe F 2,654=1.82, P=.16). Culture also contributed significantly to differences in searching information on behalf of family members ( t 480.38=5.99, P<.001) as well as to the goals of information searching.

          Conclusions

          This research found significant cultural differences in information processing preferences for online health information. Further discussion is included regarding effective communication strategies in providing quality health information.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Credibility Assessments of Online Health Information: The Effects of Source Expertise and Knowledge of Content

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups.

            Despite concerns about online health information and efforts to improve its credibility, how users evaluate and utilize such information presented in Web sites and online discussion groups may involve different evaluative mechanisms. This study examined credibility and homophily as two underlying mechanisms for social influence with regard to online health information. An original experiment detected that homophily grounded credibility perceptions and drove the persuasive process in both Web sites and online discussion groups. The more homophilous an online health information stimulus was perceived as being, the more likely people were to adopt the advice offered in that particular piece of information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Herding in online product choice

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J. Med. Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications Inc. (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                March 2016
                14 March 2016
                : 18
                : 3
                : e25
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Gachon University Seongnam, Gyeonggi ProvinceRepublic Of Korea
                [2] 2St. Cloud State University St. Cloud, MNUnited States
                [3] 3Kent State University Kent, OHUnited States
                [4] 4University of Buffalo Buffalo, NYUnited States
                [5] 5University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, WIUnited States
                [6] 6City University of Hong Kong Hong KongChina (Hong Kong)
                [7] 7Yonsei University SeoulRepublic Of Korea
                [8] 8International Christian University TokyoJapan
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Yong-Chan Kim yongckim@ 123456yonsei.ac.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-8507
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-3436
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2476-610X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8420-9113
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-5587
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-1396
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-1028
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0666-6271
                Article
                v18i3e25
                10.2196/jmir.4193
                4810010
                26976273
                6504a299-2c4f-4f76-88b0-2a880fdab6bc
                ©Hayeon Song, Kikuko Omori, Jihyun Kim, Kelly E Tenzek, Jennifer Morey Hawkins, Wan-Ying Lin, Yong-Chan Kim, Joo-Young Jung. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.03.2016.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 1 January 2015
                : 2 August 2015
                : 2 October 2015
                : 21 October 2015
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                social media,medical informatics,trust,culture,consumer behavior,consumer health information,information sharing

                Comments

                Comment on this article