8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings: A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cardiac time intervals are important hemodynamic indices and provide information about left ventricular performance. Phonocardiography (PCG), impedance cardiography (ICG), and recently, seismocardiography (SCG) have been unobtrusive methods of choice for detection of cardiac time intervals and have potentials to be integrated into wearable devices. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of beat-to-beat extraction of cardiac timings from the PCG, ICG and SCG recordings in comparison to multimodal echocardiography (Doppler, TDI, and M-mode) as the gold clinical standard. Recordings were obtained from 86 healthy adults and in total 2,120 cardiac cycles were analyzed. For estimation of the pre-ejection period (PEP), 43% of ICG annotations fell in the corresponding echocardiography ranges while this was 86% for SCG. For estimation of the total systolic time (TST), these numbers were 43, 80, and 90% for ICG, PCG, and SCG, respectively. In summary, SCG and PCG signals provided an acceptable accuracy and precision in estimating cardiac timings, as compared to ICG.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Methodological Guidelines for Impedance Cardiography

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Novel Wearable Seismocardiography and Machine Learning Algorithms Can Assess Clinical Status of Heart Failure Patients

            Background Remote monitoring of heart failure (HF) patients using wearable devices can allow patient-specific adjustments to treatments and thereby potentially reduce hospitalizations. We aimed to assess HF state using wearable measurements of electrical and mechanical aspects of cardiac function in the context of exercise. Methods and Results Patients with compensated (outpatient) and decompensated (hospitalized) HF were fitted with a wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) and seismocardiogram (SCG) sensing patch. Patients stood at rest for an initial recording, performed a six-minute walk test (6MWT), and then stood at rest for five minutes of recovery. The protocol was performed at the time of outpatient visit or at two time points (admission and discharge) during an HF hospitalization. To assess patient state, we devised a method based on comparing the similarity of the structure of SCG signals following exercise compared to rest using graph mining (Graph Similarity Score, GSS). We found that GSS can assess HF patient state, and correlates to clinical improvement in 45 patients (13 decompensated, 32 compensated). A significant difference was found between the groups in the GSS metric (44.4±4.9 [Decompensated HF] vs. 35.2±10.5 [Compensated HF], p<0.001). In the six decompensated patients with longitudinal data we found a significant change in GSS from admission (decompensated) to discharge (compensated) (44±4.1 [Admitted] vs. 35±3.9 [Discharged], p<0.05). Conclusions Wearable technologies recording cardiac function and machine learning algorithms can assess compensated and decompensated HF states by analyzing cardiac response to sub-maximal exercise. These techniques can be tested in the future to track the clinical status of outpatients with HF and their response to pharmacological interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Wearable seismocardiography: towards a beat-by-beat assessment of cardiac mechanics in ambulant subjects.

              Seismocardiogram (SCG) is the measure of the micro-vibrations produced by the heart contraction and blood ejection into the vascular tree. Over time, a large body of evidence has been collected on the ability of SCG to reflect cardiac mechanical events such as opening and closure of mitral and aortic valves, atrial filling and point of maximal aortic blood ejection. We recently developed a smart garment, named MagIC-SCG, that allows the monitoring of SCG, electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration out of the laboratory setting in ambulant subjects. The present pilot study illustrates the results of two different experiments performed to obtain a first evaluation on whether a dynamical assessment of indexes of cardiac mechanics can be obtained from SCG recordings obtained by MagIC-SCG. In the first experiment, we evaluated the consistency of the estimates of two indexes of cardiac contractility, the pre-ejection period, PEP, and the left ventricular ejection time, LVET. This was done in the lab, by reproducing an experimental protocol well known in literature, so that our measures derived from SCG could have been compared with PEP and LVET reference values obtained by traditional techniques. Six healthy subjects worn MagIC-SCG while assuming two different postures (supine and standing); PEP was estimated as the time interval between the Q wave in ECG and the SCG wave corresponding to the opening of aortic valve; LVET was the time interval between the SCG waves corresponding to the opening and closure of the aortic valve. The shift from supine to standing posture produced a significant increase in PEP and PEP/LVET ratio, a reduction in LVET and a concomitant rise in the LF/HF ratio in the RR interval (RRI) power spectrum. These results are in line with data available in literature thus providing a first support to the validity of our estimates. In the second experiment, we evaluated in one subject the feasibility of the beat-by-beat assessment of LVET during spontaneous behavior. The subject was continuously monitored by the smart garment from 8 am to 8 pm during a workday. From the whole recording, three data segments were selected: while the subject was traveling to work (M1), during work in the office (O) and while traveling back home (M2). LVET was estimated on a beat-by-beat basis from SCG and the RRI influence was removed by regression analysis. The LVET series displayed marked beat-by-beat fluctuations at the respiratory frequency. The amplitude of these fluctuations changed in the three periods and was lower when the LF/HF RRI power ratio was higher, at O, thus suggesting a possible influence of the autonomic nervous system on LVET short-term variability. To the best of our knowledge this case report provides for the first time a representation of the beat-by-beat dynamics of a systolic time interval during daily activity. The statistical characterization of these findings remains to be explored on a larger population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Physiol
                Front Physiol
                Front. Physiol.
                Frontiers in Physiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-042X
                22 August 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 1057
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [2] 2Heart Force Medical Inc. , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [3] 3IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi , Milan, Italy
                [4] 4School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, GA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University , Aalborg, Denmark
                [6] 6Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University , Burnaby, BC, Canada
                [7] 7Fraser Health Authorities , Burnaby, BC, Canada
                [8] 8Acceleron Medical Systems , Arkansaw, WI, United States
                [9] 9Electrical Engineering Department, University of North Dakota , Grand Forks, ND, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ahsan H. Khandoker, Khalifa University, United Arab Emirates

                Reviewed by: Henggui Zhang, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Richard A. Gray, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States

                *Correspondence: Kouhyar Tavakolian kouhyar.tavakolian@ 123456engr.und.edu

                This article was submitted to Computational Physiology and Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                ‡Deceased

                Article
                10.3389/fphys.2019.01057
                6713915
                31507437
                6525177e-f7ac-47bc-a71a-f1303d6c0ce8
                Copyright © 2019 Dehkordi, Khosrow-Khavar, Di Rienzo, Inan, Schmidt, Blaber, Sørensen, Struijk, Zakeri, Lombardi, Shandhi, Borairi, Zanetti and Tavakolian.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 February 2019
                : 02 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 1, References: 32, Pages: 11, Words: 7478
                Categories
                Physiology
                Original Research

                Anatomy & Physiology
                cardiac time intervals,phonocardiography (pcg),impedance cardiography (icg),seismocardiography (scg),echocardiography,pre-ejection period (pep),left ventricular ejection time (lvet)

                Comments

                Comment on this article