35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Virtually Dead: Digital Public Mortuary Archaeology

      , 2
      Internet Archaeology
      Council for British Archaeology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over recent decades, the ethics, politics and public engagements of mortuary archaeology have received sustained scrutiny, including how we handle, write about and display the archaeological dead. Yet the burgeoning use of digital media to engage different audiences in the archaeology of death and burial have so far escaped attention. This article explores categories and strategies by which digital media create virtual communities engaging with mortuary archaeology. Considering digital public mortuary archaeology (DPMA) as a distinctive theme linking archaeology, mortality and material culture, we discuss blogs, vlogs and Twitter as case studies to illustrate the variety of strategies by which digital media can promote, educate and engage public audiences with archaeological projects and research relating to death and the dead in the human past. The article then explores a selection of key critical concerns regarding how the digital dead are currently portrayed, identifying the need for further investigation and critical reflection on DPMA's aims, objectives and aspired outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Social Web and Archaeology’s Restructuring: Impact, Exploitation, Disciplinary Change

          From blogs to crowdfunding, YouTube to LinkedIn, online photo-sharing sites to open-source community-based software projects, the social web has been a meaningful player in the development of archaeological practice for two decades now. Yet despite its myriad applications, it is still often appreciated as little more than a tool for communication, rather than a paradigm-shifting system that also shapes the questions we ask in our research, the nature and spread of our data, and the state of skill and expertise in the profession. We see this failure to critically engage with its dimensions as one of the most profound challenges confronting archaeology today. The social web is bound up in relations of power, control, freedom, labour and exploitation, with consequences that portend real instability for the cultural sector and for social welfare overall. Only a handful of archaeologists, however, are seriously debating these matters, which suggests the discipline is setting itself up to be swept away by our unreflective investment in the cognitive capitalist enterprise that marks much current web-based work. Here we review the state of play of the archaeological social web, and reflect on various conscientious activities aimed both at challenging practitioners’ current online interactions, and at otherwise situating the discipline as a more informed innovator with the social web’s possibilities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Antisocial media in archaeology?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ‘The king in the car park’: new light on the death and burial of Richard III in the Grey Friars church, Leicester, in 1485

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Internet Archaeology
                IA
                Council for British Archaeology
                13635387
                2015
                2015
                :
                : 40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Chester
                [2 ]University of Sheffield
                Article
                10.11141/ia.40.7.4
                65256fab-b15a-4ae7-8b5a-e96fa2f57339
                © 2015

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History

                Pre-history,Early modern history,Archaeology,Anthropology,Ancient history,History
                Pre-history, Early modern history, Archaeology, Anthropology, Ancient history, History

                Comments

                Comment on this article