4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ways Ahead: developing a supported self-management programme for people living with low- and intermediate-grade gliomas - a protocol for a multi-method study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Living with and beyond a diagnosis of a low- and intermediate-grade glioma (LIGG) can adversely impact many aspects of people’s lives and their quality of life (QoL). In people with chronic conditions, self-management can improve QoL. This is especially true if people are supported to self-manage. Supported self-management programmes have been developed for several cancers, but the unique challenges experienced by LIGG survivors mean these programmes may not be readily transferable to this group. The Ways Ahead study aims to address this gap by exploring the needs of LIGG survivors to develop a prototype for a supported self-management programme tailored to this group.

          Methods and analysis

          Ways Ahead will follow three sequential phases, underpinned by a systematic review of self-management interventions in cancer. In phase 1, qualitative methods will be used to explore and understand the issues faced by LIGG survivors, as well as the barriers and facilitators to self-management. Three sets of interviews will be conducted with LIGG survivors, their informal carers and professionals. Thematic analysis will be conducted with reference to the Theoretical Domains Framework and Normalisation Process Theory. Phase 2 will involve co-production workshops to generate ideas for the design of a supported self-management programme. Workshop outputs will be translated into a design specification for a prototype programme. Finally, phase 3 will involve a health economic assessment to examine the feasibility and benefits of incorporating the proposed programme into the current survivorship care pathway. This prototype will then be ready for testing in a subsequent trial.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The study has been reviewed and approved by an National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 20/WA/0118). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, broadcast media, the study website, The Brain Tumour Charity and stakeholder engagement activities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare

            Objective To provide researchers with guidance on actions to take during intervention development. Summary of key points Based on a consensus exercise informed by reviews and qualitative interviews, we present key principles and actions for consideration when developing interventions to improve health. These include seeing intervention development as a dynamic iterative process, involving stakeholders, reviewing published research evidence, drawing on existing theories, articulating programme theory, undertaking primary data collection, understanding context, paying attention to future implementation in the real world and designing and refining an intervention using iterative cycles of development with stakeholder input throughout. Conclusion Researchers should consider each action by addressing its relevance to a specific intervention in a specific context, both at the start and throughout the development process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                29 July 2020
                : 10
                : 7
                : e041465
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [2 ]Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [3 ]Institute of Technology Sligo , Sligo, Ireland
                [4 ]departmentSchool of Psychology , Dublin City University , Dublin, Ireland
                [5 ]departmentDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health , Northumbria University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Ben Rimmer; ben.rimmer@ 123456newcastle.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4110-0588
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-041465
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041465
                7394298
                32727741
                6560a7c0-4c0a-4d5c-a8a8-e9529c636b76
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 09 June 2020
                : 16 June 2020
                : 17 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002203, Brain Tumour Charity;
                Award ID: GN-000435
                Categories
                Oncology
                1506
                1717
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                health economics,neurological oncology,adult oncology,qualitative research
                Medicine
                health economics, neurological oncology, adult oncology, qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article