5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Corneal Abrasion from Removing Face Mask during the COVID-19 Pandemic

      case-report
      , MRCSEd(Ophth), AFCOphthHK a , b , *
      Visual Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Elsevier Inc.
      Masks, Cornea, Coronavirus, Ophthalmology, Corneal injuries

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1 Visual Case Discussion A 51-year-old man attended the emergency department for left eye immediate pain after face mask removal for office lunch. He complained of left eye tearing and foreign body sensation. Without any ocular disease or ophthalmic surgery history, he did not wear glasses or contact lens. Patient postulated his left eye was scratched by the sharp edge of the face mask upon removal. Emergency screening examinations found injected left eye (Figure 1 ) with an oblique area of simple corneal abrasion, stained up by fluorescein, without corneal infiltration. The corneal laceration was superficial without deep stromal involvement upon slit lamp examination, and Seidel test was negative. Analgesic eye drops were given to complete a thorough eye examination. Visual acuity was Snellen 1.0 and 0.3 over right and left eye respectively, and intraocular pressures were normal of 15mmHg over both eyes. Anterior chambers were deep bilaterally and symmetrical; pupils were round and reactive, of equal 3mm size, without any signs of subtle eyeball rupture. Fundus examinations were unremarkable. Figure 1 Clinical photo of patient's left eye after the injury. The oblique corneal abrasion area (white arrow) was stained green (outlined by red line) with fluorescein; note the fluorescein stained tears (green arrowheads). Figure 1 Patient was given hypromellose eye drops, symptoms gradually improved, and the corneal abrasion was healed in 4 days. Follow-up visits did not reveal any infection, nor corneal scarring. Visual acuity of the left eye was back to Snellen 1.0 after full recovery. Patient voiced out an adaptive change on his face mask removal technique after the incident, aiming to avoid edges of the face mask passing around the cornea. Despite the vigorous debate across parties worldwide, face mask wear is promising in minimizing the spread of COVID-19. Most healthcare workers are now wearing face masks within clinical areas. On the other hand, simple surgical face mask is gaining popularity among the public. 1 With an increased usage, face mask related ocular complaints such as dry eyes, ocular allergies, periocular skin deconditioning etc. all become hot research topics. However, face mask related direct ocular trauma was rarely reported in literature, in contrast to previous report on alcohol-based hand sanitizer related ocular injury. 2 Our reported case of ocular surface injury by the sharp edge of face mask serves as an important reminder to both daily face mask users of the general public, and the manufacturers for improving their products' design. The injury mechanism in our case was thought to be a rotational move of the mask in front of the face (Figure 2 , green arrow) when the eye was hit by the squared edge (Figure 2, red arrow). Reviewing the commonly available face masks, we found their corners and the corrugated side edges (Figure 3 , red arrows) are all potential sharp points that could lacerate the corneal surface. Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 3 Figure 3 Simple corneal abrasion alone can cause intense pain and distress, as denuding the corneal epithelium exposes the nociceptors in the corneal stroma. Cornea is one of the most richly innervated human tissues, with a few hundred times more densely packed pain receptors than our surface skin. 3 This pain is often accompanied by photophobia and lacrimation, mimicking the picture of more severe ocular inflammations like uveitis or scleritis flare. Simple corneal abrasion could be treated barely by supportive lubrications, whereas topical antibiotic eye drop is indicated in corneal infiltrate cases. Short term topical cycloplegic eye drop might be given for comfort purpose, or dampening the anterior chamber activities. Patching of the injury eye is often not advisable as it delays healing. Complications of corneal abrasion include, but not limited to, recurrent corneal erosion syndrome (RCES) and microbial keratitis. RCES defined as recurrent episodes of spontaneous breakdown of corneal epithelium, is particularly vulnerable in large and ragged abrasion. With defects in hemi-desmosomes, RCES's pathology lies on the failure of epithelium to basement membrane re-adhesion. Diabetes, dry eye, ocular rosacea, previous sharp trauma, and corneal dystrophies (e.g. epithelial basement membrane dystrophy) are all risk factors of RCES. Therefore, patients with traumatic corneal abrasion should be warned of RCES, when the recurrent episodes usually start at eye opening after sleep. In short, face mask usage is more prevalent worldwide in the COVID-19 era. Other than proper handling of face mask to prevent infection, users are reminded of its potential harm from the subtle sharp edges. Declaration of Competing Interest None

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Observations on the innervation of the cornea.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hand sanitizer associated ocular chemical injury: A mini-review on its rise under COVID-19

            Sunny, Au (2020)
            1 Visual Case Discussion A 32-year-old lady attended the emergency department for left eye pain after accidental splitting of alcohol-based hand rub gel into the left eye by herself. She was not on contact lens or goggles, and never had corneal or laser refractive surgery before. As a practice of hand hygiene under COVID-19, she was applying her pocket-sized instant hand sanitizer gel (Figure 1 ) over her left hand after touching the public facilities. It was an alcohol-based gel with 70% denatured alcohol, phenoxyethanol, mixed with glycerin and melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil. Unluckily, the bottle was almost finished, and she was trying hard with her right hand to squeeze out the last bit when the gel suddenly ejected straight into her left eye. She experienced instant pain, and blurring of vision persisted despite repeated blinking. The pain was so intense few moments later that she could not even open her left eye or blink. She was accompanied by her colleague to attend the emergency department, but there was no self irrigation done before her arrival. Figure 1 Alcohol-based hand sanitizer gel. Patient showed us another new tube of her pocket-sized instant hand sanitizer. Note the flammable warning label over the bottle due to its alcohol-based nature. The hand sanitizer gel is quite viscous judged from those air bubbles trapped inside the gel content, hinting its resistance towards barely water irrigation. Manual swabbing of the fornices was required to avoid retain of chemical gel causing continuing ocular damage over the blind-ended sacs. Figure 1: Treated as chemical injury, the triage nurse revealed no systemic burns or periocular injury. Immediate irrigation was done at triage, and test on pH was 8. Topical anesthetic eye drop was instilled, and ocular irrigation device (Morgan Lens, Figure 2 ) was then inserted. Irrigation by 2L normal saline was given at full rate before formal eye assessment. Figure 2 Ocular irrigation device. This contact lens type of irrigation device is connected with tubing as illustrated by the cartoon drawings on its package. It comes in individual sterile package, and is made of rigid plastic which supports the opening of both upper and lower fornices upon continuous irrigation. Irrigation solution would go over the space between the ocular surface and the device, then towards the fornices before overflowing out of the injured eye. Figure 2: With some improvement, patient was examined at slit lamp. There was no limbal ischemia (Figure 3 ); cornea was haze yet iris details were clearly visible. Fluorescein stain showed ∼80% central corneal epithelial defect (Figures 3 and 4 ; Video 1), but no conjunctival involvement (Figure 4). Without any history of Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), the corneal defect was unlikely caused by LASIK flap dislodgement, a rare complication of continuous irrigation. Repeated pH test was still alkaline (Figure 5 ), probably from the remaining viscous sanitizer gel over the fornices which resisted to just normal saline irrigation. Therefore, fornices were swabbed few times with eversion (Figure 6 ) before proceeding to further irrigation. Further 6L irrigation was done before pH was neutralized. Patient was prescribed with topical antibiotics and lubricating eye drops, oral analgesia and ascorbic acid of 1g BD. The corneal defect was healed gradually in 2-week times, and final visual acuity was 0.9 Snellen decimal without any permanent visual loss. Figure 3 Slit lamp photo of the patient's left eye. Conjunctival injection was evidenced (black arrowheads) without any limbal ischemia, which would have appeared as blanched vessels without visible blood flow, thus whitish in color. Corneal defect was stained as green color by fluorescein, and the underlying iris details (white arrow) were well seen on slit lamp. There was neither anterior chamber cell nor fibrin. Figure 3: Figure 4 Slit lamp view with blue filter over the fluorescein stained left eye. Large area of the central cornea (∼80%) was stained up (green color area), suggestive of corneal epithelial defect. Temporal conjunctiva (white asterisk) shown in this figure revealed no conjunctival involvement. The anatomical landmark of the limbus and the lateral canthus were pointed out respectively by the arrowheads and the arrow. Figure 4: Figure 5 pH test of the inferior fornix. The soaked fluid from the ocular surface showed an alkaline pH value of ∼8, higher than the physiological pH. Further irrigation was continued after swabbing of fornix as shown in Figure 6. Figure 5: Figure 6 Slit lamp photo illustrating inferior fornix eversion. White arrows outlined the area over the inferior fornix. Cotton tip applicator soaked with saline was further inserted deep into the fornix to swab away the remaining sanitizer gel. Black arrow head pointed at the normal pupil demonstrated constriction to light without any traumatic mydriasis. Figure 6: With increasing COVID-19 infected cases of >19million worldwide, people around the world are practicing strict personal hygiene against infection. 1 Alcohol-based hand sanitizer was one of the best sellers, and its associated accident was also on rising trend. From our hospital data, there were only 1 –2 cases annually before the COVID-19 era, which most were healthcare workers' accidental injuries on duty. Since the local COVID-19 outbreak 3 months ago, there were already 5 cases of personal hygiene gadgets associated ocular injury. Other than the hand sanitizer as described, ocular phototoxicity from ultraviolet lamp misuse was also reported. In addition, sanitizer aerosol-driven ocular surface disease (SADOSD) was raised in recent ophthalmology literature. As a matter of fact, alcohol is widely used in different ocular surgeries. Ophthalmologists are familiar with the 20% ethanol usage in laser refractive surgery such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), or in treatment of corneal diseases like corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus, alcohol delamination of epithelium for recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) patients etc. During these ophthalmic procedures, alcohol is applied on cornea with the metal well. It weakens binding of corneal epithelial hemidesmosomal attachment to the underlying Bowman's layer, allowing complete removal for further operations. However, the component of ethanol in alcohol-based hand sanitizers ranges usually from 60 –95%, which is much higher than ophthalmic usage. This high concentration of alcohol is associated with increase in inflammatory response, cellular stress and damaging effects on keratocytes. Chemical injury of the eye is almost the only ocular emergency that should be treated before formal history and clinical assessment. Different classifications for ocular chemical burns are available; which the widely accepted Roper-Hall 2 and Dua 3 classifications took into account of corneal clarity, limbal ischemia and conjunctival involvement to determine the prognosis. Most cleansing agents are alkali, unfortunately alkaline burn is worse than an acidic burn. It is because acid triggers tissue coagulation, and the coagulum acts a natural barrier preventing further depth penetration of the acidic chemicals. Concerning ocular treatment, on site instant irrigation with copious amount of water is essential to dilute the offending chemicals. Fornices swabbing is essential to remove residual over the blind-ended sac in case of persistent abnormal pHs. Prolonged irrigation is sometimes needed for persistent abnormal pHs, when ocular irrigation device would be less labor-intensive and more comfortable to patients. The rigid contact lens-shaped design of Morgan lens supports the opening of both upper and lower fornices upon continuous irrigation. Prior to insertion, the lower eyelid is first pulled down to allow space for insertion of the lower lip of the device; next retraction of the upper eyelid allows adequate exposure of the interpalpebral area to insert the whole device over the cornea. Irrigation solution would go over the space between the ocular surface and the device, then towards the fornices before overflowing out of the injured eye. Following acute care, physicians could prescribe topical lubricating eye drops, oral analgesic and ascorbic acid to promote the ocular surface healing. In short, hand sanitizer is at risk of ocular chemical injury, and emergency physicians should be expecting more cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proper management of the chemically injured eyes would save the victims' vision. Question 1: In an alkaline chemical injured eye by household cleansing agent, which of the following clinical signs points towards poor prognosis? A) Corneal epithelial defect of 1mm in size B) Cornea haze without opaque cornea C) Iris details visible D) Limbal ischemia involving 10 clock hours’ area E) 30% of conjunctival involvement from chemical burns Correct answer: (D) Limbal ischemia involving 10 clock hours’ area Discussion & rationale: Small corneal epithelial defect is of good visual prognosis, unless the lesion depth is beyond the Bowman's layer and over the central visual axis. According to the Roper-Hall classification of severity of ocular surface burns (1965), 2 grade IV chemical injured eyes with opaque cornea, iris details obscured, and >50% of limbus showing ischemia are of poor prognosis. Conjunctival involvement was not addressed by the Roper-Hall classification; instead Dua's new classification in 2001 highlighted this. 3 In Dua classification, 3 grade V or above with >75% conjunctival involvement, and >9 clock hours of limbal ischemia are of guarded to poor prognosis. Question 2 After the acute management of the chemical injured eye with copious amount of normal saline irrigation, there was a 1.5mm x 2mm corneal defect. In addition to topical antibiotics, which of the following is indicated to promote his/ her corneal healing? a) Oral prednisolone of 1 gram b) Oral ascorbic acid of 1gram c) Topical alpha-2 receptor agonist eye drop, e.g. apraclonidine 1% d) Topical beta-blocker eye drop, e.g. timolol 0.5% e) Topical muscarinic receptor (cholinergic) agonist/ parasympathomimetics eye drop, e.g. pilocarpine 4% Correct answer: (b) Oral ascorbic acid of 1gram Discussion & rationale: Ascorbic acid reverses a localized tissue scorbutic state and improves wound healing, promoting the synthesis of mature collagen by corneal fibroblasts. It is an effective scavenger of damaging free radicals. Both topical (e.g. sodium ascorbate 10%) and systemic ascorbic acid of high dose (e.g. Vitamin C 1g BD) are effective. However, usage of ascorbic acid should be avoided in acidic chemical burns and renal patients. Steroids reduce inflammation and neutrophil infiltration, but impair stromal healing by reducing collagen synthesis and inhibiting fibroblast migration. Topical steroids may be used initially, but must be tailed off after 7–10 days. Oral prednisolone of 1 gram is not necessary, and is harmful at such a high dose. Topical alpha-2 receptor agonist eye drop, e.g. apraclonidine 1%, is used as therapeutic eye drop to lower intraocular pressure (IOP), or as pharmacological test to confirm a Horner pupil, which will dilate 30 minutes after instillation and even improves the associated ptosis. Other IOP lowering agents are topical beta-blocker eye drop, and topical muscarinic receptor (cholinergic) agonist/ parasympathomimetics eye drop. They are not necessary in chemical injured eyes, unless complicated with secondary glaucoma. Video 1: Slit lamp examinations of the fluorescein stained ocular surface with blue filter. The corneal defect was obvious, whereas the conjunctival was spared from any injury.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A surge in eye clinic nonattendance under 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak

              Sir, Being a pandemic but mainly a respiratory disease,[1]2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is fearing patients back from the ophthalmology clinics with possible conjunctival transmission and evidence of human-to-human transmission.[2] Even with strict sterilization of instruments, high-risk activities do exist in an ophthalmology clinic. Disease transmission is possible through tears via cross-eye anesthetic and mydriatic drops applications;[3] and even via noncontact examinations such as ocular response analyzer and tonometry,[4] when microaerosols are generated from the air puff.[5] Herein, we report our public emergency hospital-based general ophthalmology clinic situations. There was no confirmed COVID-19 case from our acute hospital during the investigative period. The background daily nonattendance rate 1 month before the incidence was 6.0% (14 out of 234)–10.3% (22 out of 213), which rose to 19.1% (38 out of 199)–22.0% (42 out of 191) after the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in Hong Kong. The portion of the patient defaulting appointment further doubled to 42.1% (96 out of 228)–46.0% (109 out of 237) after the first COVID-19 mortality case. Around 547 patients, ranged from 2 to 93 years (average 65.6) were contacted through telephone for reasons of nonattendance while rescheduling their defaulted appointments. For pediatric cases (22.9%), their parents were contacted. Most defaulted patients (44.6%) reported fear of COVID-19 infection upon attending the hospitals [Table 1]. Among the 15.0% of patients who reported forgetfulness, 6 patients claimed that they were busy purchasing facemasks, alcohol swabs and daily necessities for the foreseeable prolonged pandemic. In short, more than half of the nonattendance patients reported COVID-19 related reasons. Table 1 Reasons for ophthalmology clinic nonattendance under 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak Reasons of nonattendance n=547 Fear of 2019-nCoV infection upon attending the hospital 44.6% Forgetfulness 15.0% Acute illness (all kinds) 12.8% On self-quarantine for 2019-nCoV 6.4% Out of town 4.6% Resolution of eye problems 4.2% Failed to be phone contacted (including death on the registry) 12.4% About 26.0% (142 patients) were glaucoma patients who required long-term regular glaucoma medications whereas 19.6% (107 patients) were following up for macula diseases who required serial monitoring and timely antivascular endothelial growth factor injections. Despite the advances of teleophthalmology, most applications are on screening and monitoring aspects of diseases. The fundamental treatment of diseases still relies on physical patient-doctor interactions. In conclusion, we observed a sudden surge in ophthalmology clinic nonattendance during the local COVID-19 outbreak, especially after the locally reported mortality cases. The situation is worrisome as disease progression is possible without timely treatment for potentially blinding eye diseases. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: FHKAM (Ophthalmology)
                Journal
                Vis J Emerg Med
                Vis J Emerg Med
                Visual Journal of Emergency Medicine
                Elsevier Inc.
                2405-4690
                23 December 2020
                23 December 2020
                : 100958
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Ophthalmology, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
                [b ]9/F, MO office, Lo Ka Chow Memorial Ophthalmic Centre, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, 19 Eastern Hospital Road, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong, HKSAR
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Telephone: (852) 2595 7031
                Article
                S2405-4690(20)30247-8 100958
                10.1016/j.visj.2020.100958
                7756156
                33363259
                6574887b-2bed-49d6-b7e2-987f86d1fa54
                © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 23 September 2020
                : 11 November 2020
                : 13 December 2020
                Categories
                Article

                masks,cornea,coronavirus,ophthalmology,corneal injuries
                masks, cornea, coronavirus, ophthalmology, corneal injuries

                Comments

                Comment on this article