20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Subfunctionalization of Paralogous Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors from the Frog Xenopus Laevis: Distinct Target Genes and Differential Responses to Specific Agonists in a Single Cell Type

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gene duplication confers genetic redundancy that can facilitate subfunctionalization, the partitioning of ancestral functions between paralogs. We capitalize on a recent genome duplication in Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) to interrogate possible functional differentiation between alloalleles of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates toxicity of dioxin-like compounds and plays a role in the physiology and development of the cardiovascular, hepatic, and immune systems in vertebrates. X. laevis has 2 AHR genes, AHR1α and AHR1β. To test the hypothesis that the encoded proteins exhibit different molecular functions, we used TALENs in XLK-WG cells, generating mutant lines lacking functional versions of each AHR and measuring the transcriptional responsiveness of several target genes to the toxic xenobiotic 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin (TCDD) and the candidate endogenous ligand 6-formylindolo[3,2- b]carbazole (FICZ). Mutation of either AHR1α or AHR1β reduced TCDD induction of the canonical AHR target, Cytochrome P4501A6, by 75%, despite the much lower abundance of AHR1β in wild-type cells. More modestly induced target genes, encoding aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor ( AHRR), spectrin repeat-containing nuclear envelope protein 1 ( SYNE-1), and gap junction protein gamma 1 ( GJC1), were regulated solely by AHR1α. AHR1β was responsible for CYP1A6 induction by FICZ, while AHR1α mediated FICZ induction of AHRR. We conclude that AHR1α and AHR1β have distinct transcriptional functions in response to specific agonists, even within a single cell type. Functional analysis of frog AHR paralogs advances the understanding of AHR evolution and as well as the use of frog models of developmental toxicology such as FETAX.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Toxicol Sci
          Toxicol. Sci
          toxsci
          toxsci
          Toxicological Sciences
          Oxford University Press
          1096-6080
          1096-0929
          February 2017
          19 October 2016
          : 155
          : 2
          : 337-347
          Affiliations
          Biology Department, Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio 43022
          Author notes

          1Present address: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Vascular Biology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, 10065.

          2To whom correspondence should be addressed at Biology Department, Kenyon College, 202 N. College Dr, Gambier, Ohio 43022. Fax: +1 740 427 5741. E-mail: powellw@ 123456kenyon.edu .
          Article
          PMC5291211 PMC5291211 5291211 kfw212
          10.1093/toxsci/kfw212
          5291211
          27994169
          658f2119-d09c-41fb-9ce3-93d3c8f84d19
          © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
          History
          Page count
          Pages: 11
          Categories
          Agonist-Specific Effects at the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
          Custom metadata
          corrected-proof

          non-mammalian species, in vitro and alternatives.,cell culture,evolution,gene expression/regulation,hydrocarbon,aryl,receptor,environmental toxicology

          Comments

          Comment on this article