9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Discrimination of envelope statistics reveals evidence of sub-clinical hearing damage in a noise-exposed population with 'normal' hearing thresholds.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Noise exposure can affect the functioning of inner hair cells (IHC) within the cochlea, leading to a 'noisy' representation of the properties of sounds even when absolute thresholds are normal. This may lead to a reduced ability to discriminate sounds based on their statistical properties, especially for narrowband sounds presented at low levels, since such sounds excite only a small proportion of the IHCs. This idea was tested by requiring subjects to discriminate a Gaussian noise from a 'low-noise noise' with minimal envelope fluctuations. The noises were centred at 2, 3, or 4 kHz. The stimulus duration required for threshold was measured as a function of sensation level (SL) for two groups of normal-hearing subjects, one rarely exposed to high-noise events (control group, C) and one frequently exposed to high-noise events (experimental group, X). For group X, threshold consistently rose for SLs below about 20 dB, while for group C the threshold did not consistently rise at low SLs (although it did for a minority of subjects). The worsening in performance with decreasing level was significantly greater for group X than for group C.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Audiol
          International journal of audiology
          1708-8186
          1499-2027
          Dec 2008
          : 47
          : 12
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. mas19@cam.ac.uk
          Article
          906647667
          10.1080/14992020802290543
          19085398
          65d26e3f-0863-4a31-913c-922b4a6cf2ad
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article