22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Communication of Culturally Dominant Modes of Attention from Parents to Children: A Comparison of Canadian and Japanese Parent-Child Conversations during a Joint Scene Description Task

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Previous findings have indicated that, when presented with visual information, North American undergraduate students selectively attend to focal objects, whereas East Asian undergraduate students are more sensitive to background information. However, little is known about how these differences are driven by culture and socialization processes. In this study, two experiments investigated how young children and their parents used culturally unique modes of attention (selective vs. context sensitive attention). We expected that children would slowly learn culturally unique modes of attention, and the experience of communicating with their parents would aid the development of such modes of attention. Study 1 tested children’s solitary performance by examining Canadian and Japanese children’s (4–6 vs. 7–9 years old) modes of attention during a scene description task, whereby children watched short animations by themselves and then described their observations. The results confirmed that children did not demonstrate significant cross-cultural differences in attention during the scene description task while working independently, although results did show rudimentary signs of culturally unique modes of attention in this task scenario by age 9. Study 2 examined parent–child (4–6 and 7–9 years old) dyads using the same task. The results indicated that parents communicated to their children differently across cultures, replicating attentional differences among undergraduate students in previous cross-cultural studies. Study 2 also demonstrated that children’s culturally unique description styles increased significantly with age. The descriptions made by the older group (7–9 years old) showed significant cross-cultural variances in attention, while descriptions among the younger group (4–6 years old) did not. The significance of parental roles in the development of culturally unique modes of attention is discussed in addition to other possible facilitators of this developmental process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Culture and point of view.

            East Asians and Westerners perceive the world and think about it in very different ways. Westerners are inclined to attend to some focal object, analyzing its attributes and categorizing it in an effort to find out what rules govern its behavior. Rules used include formal logic. Causal attributions tend to focus exclusively on the object and are therefore often mistaken. East Asians are more likely to attend to a broad perceptual and conceptual field, noticing relationships and changes and grouping objects based on family resemblance rather than category membership. Causal attributions emphasize the context. Social factors are likely to be important in directing attention. East Asians live in complex social networks with prescribed role relations. Attention to context is important to effective functioning. More independent Westerners live in less constraining social worlds and have the luxury of attending to the object and their goals with respect to it. The physical "affordances" of the environment may also influence perception. The built environments of the East are more complex and contain more objects than do those of the West. In addition, artistic products of the East emphasize the field and deemphasize individual objects, including people. Western art renders less of the field and emphasizes individual objects and people.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment.

              East Asian cognition has been held to be relatively holistic; that is, attention is paid to the field as a whole. Western cognition, in contrast, has been held to be object focused and control oriented. In this study East Asians (mostly Chinese) and Americans were compared on detection of covariation and field dependence. The results showed the following: (a) Chinese participants reported stronger association between events, were more responsive to differences in covariation, and were more confident about their covariation judgments; (b) these cultural differences disappeared when participants believed they had some control over the covariation judgment task; (c) American participants made fewer mistakes on the Rod-and-Frame Test, indicating that they were less field dependent; (d) American performance and confidence, but not that of Asians, increased when participants were given manual control of the test. Possible origins of the perceptual differences are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 January 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 1
                : e0147199
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Human Development and Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [3 ]Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
                [4 ]Graduate School of Brain Sciences, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan
                Centre for Coevolution of Biology & Culture, University of Durham, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: SS TM. Performed the experiments: SS TM. Analyzed the data: SS TM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SS TM. Wrote the paper: SS TM AT HO. Obtained permission for use of participant pools: AT HO.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-38192
                10.1371/journal.pone.0147199
                4733050
                26824241
                65e3aa47-984f-4d13-b24e-83356b16cb1d
                © 2016 Senzaki et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 2 September 2015
                : 30 December 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 20
                Funding
                This work was supported by the Alberta Innovates Scholarship (200801188) to SS ( http://www.albertatechfutures.ca), SSHRC grant (410-2007-382)to TM ( http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/home-accueil-eng.aspx). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Children
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Children
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Attention
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Attention
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Attention
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                Cross-Cultural Studies
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Social Systems
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are included in the Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article