4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation Both Activate Spinal GABAergic Mechanisms to Attenuate Pain in a Rat Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Experimental and clinical studies have shown that tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) releases gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the spinal dorsal horn. Recently, it was suggested that burst SCS does not act via spinal GABAergic mechanisms. Therefore, we studied spinal GABA release during burst and tonic SCS, both anatomically and pharmacologically, in a well‐established chronic neuropathic pain model.

          Methods

          Animals underwent partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL). Quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of intracellular GABA levels in the lumbar L4 to L6 dorsal spinal cord was performed after 60 minutes of burst, tonic, or sham SCS in rats that had undergone PSNL ( = 16). In a second pharmacological experiment, the effects of intrathecal administration of the GABA A antagonist bicuculline (5 μg) and the GABA B antagonist phaclofen (5 μg) were assessed. Paw withdrawal thresholds to von Frey filaments of rats that had undergone PSNL ( n = 20) were tested during 60 minutes of burst and tonic SCS 30 minutes after intrathecal administration of the drugs.

          Results

          Quantitative IHC analysis of GABA immunoreactivity in spinal dorsal horn sections of animals that had received burst SCS ( n = 5) showed significantly lower intracellular GABA levels when compared to sham SCS sections ( n = 4; P = 0.0201) and tonic SCS sections ( n = 7; P = 0.0077). Intrathecal application of the GABA A antagonist bicuculline (5 μg; n = 10) or the GABA B antagonist phaclofen (5 μg; n = 10) resulted in ablation of the analgesic effect for both burst SCS and tonic SCS.

          Conclusions

          In conclusion, our anatomical and pharmacological data demonstrate that, in this well‐established chronic neuropathic animal model, the analgesic effects of both burst SCS and tonic SCS are mediated via spinal GABAergic mechanisms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The contribution of GABAA and glycine receptors to central sensitization: disinhibition and touch-evoked allodynia in the spinal cord.

          1. Pain hypersensitivity is characterized by an increase in the response to noxious stimuli (hyperalgesia) and a reduction in threshold such that innocuous stimuli begin to elicit pain (allodynia). These sensitivity changes can be produced by an increase in excitability of dorsal horn neurons; the phenomenon of central sensitization. We have now examined whether a reduction in local segmental inhibitory mechanisms produces similar changes. The model system used for studying touch-evoked allodynia has been the recruitment of a low-threshold mechanoreceptor input to the nociceptive flexion withdrawal reflex in the decerebrate-spinal rat. 2. Hamstring flexor alpha motoneurons are characterized by high-threshold cutaneous receptive fields. Mechanical stimuli (pinch or firm pressure) evoke a brisk firing response in these cells, whereas low-intensity stimuli (light touch or brush) produce little or no effect, as expected for the output neurons of the nociceptive flexion withdrawal reflex. 3. Primary afferent C fiber conditioning inputs have previously been shown to produce prolonged increases in the excitability of the flexion reflex, as measured by the augmentation of the response to high-intensity peripheral stimuli. We have now examined whether these conditioning inputs and segmental disinhibition modify the responsiveness of the reflex to low-threshold inputs. 4. Brief (20 s), low-frequency (1 Hz), C fiber conditioning stimuli to the sural nerve increased the response of the hamstring flexor motor neurons to low-intensity cutaneous touch stimuli, reduced the cutaneous mechanical threshold, and increased the response to A beta inputs from the sural nerve. 5. Intrathecal injections of subconvulsant doses of the glycine receptor antagonist, strychnine (7 nmol) or the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (8 nmol) produced similar but longer lasting changes. The GABAB antagonist P-(3-aminopropyl)-P-diethoxymethyl-phosphonic acid (CGP 35348) had no significant effects. 6. The nociceptive flexion withdrawal reflex is under the control, therefore, of segmental inhibitory mechanisms mediated by glycine and GABAA receptors. Removal of this inhibition enables the reflex to be activated by low-intensity cutaneous stimuli. Given the similarities between the stimulus-response profiles of the nociceptive flexion reflex and the production of pain in man, these findings indicate that a decrease in the efficacy of spinal inhibitory circuits may contribute to the touch-evoked allodynia that occurs in pain hypersensitivity states, where A beta inputs begin to produce pain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Parameters of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Their Role in Electrical Charge Delivery: A Review.

            All spinal cord stimulation (SCS) parameters (amplitude, pulse width, frequency) influence the interaction of stimulation with the nervous system and impact the delivery of charge. Regardless of the stimulation pattern, there are certain crucial elements related to dose, and a basic fundamental knowledge of the parameters used to administer the therapy is fundamentally important.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Conventional and Novel Spinal Stimulation Algorithms: Hypothetical Mechanisms of Action and Comments on Outcomes.

              Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) emerged as a direct clinical spin-off from the Gate Control Theory from 1965. Over the last decade, several new modes of SCS have appeared. This review discusses these novel techniques and their hypothetical mechanisms of action.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                k.meuwissen@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                Journal
                Pain Pract
                Pain Pract
                10.1111/(ISSN)1533-2500
                PAPR
                Pain Practice
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1530-7085
                1533-2500
                09 September 2019
                January 2020
                : 20
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/papr.v20.1 )
                : 75-87
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management Pain Management and Research Centre MUMC+ Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS) Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Boston Scientific: Neuromodulation, Research and Advanced Concepts Team Valencia California U.S.A
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Koen P.V. Meuwissen, MSc, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Pain Management and Research Centre, Tongersestraat 72F, 6211LP Maastricht, The Netherlands. E‐mail: k.meuwissen@ 123456maastrichtuniversity.nl .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-6513
                Article
                PAPR12831
                10.1111/papr.12831
                7004135
                31424152
                6601c358-fab7-4c26-b43d-37e8a57d806a
                © 2019 The Authors. Pain Practice published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of World Institute of Pain.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 27 April 2019
                : 28 July 2019
                : 12 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 13, Words: 7520
                Funding
                Funded by: Boston Scientific Inc
                Award ID: ISRNO060009
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:06.02.2020

                gamma‐aminobutyric acid,burst spinal cord stimulation,gabaa/b receptor antagonist,peripheral nerve injury,mechanical hypersensitivity

                Comments

                Comment on this article