6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Morphological and genetic correlates in the left–right asymmetric scale-eating cichlid fish of Lake Tanganyika

      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 4
      Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          PopGenome: An Efficient Swiss Army Knife for Population Genomic Analyses in R

          Although many computer programs can perform population genetics calculations, they are typically limited in the analyses and data input formats they offer; few applications can process the large data sets produced by whole-genome resequencing projects. Furthermore, there is no coherent framework for the easy integration of new statistics into existing pipelines, hindering the development and application of new population genetics and genomics approaches. Here, we present PopGenome, a population genomics package for the R software environment (a de facto standard for statistical analyses). PopGenome can efficiently process genome-scale data as well as large sets of individual loci. It reads DNA alignments and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data sets in most common formats, including those used by the HapMap, 1000 human genomes, and 1001 Arabidopsis genomes projects. PopGenome also reads associated annotation files in GFF format, enabling users to easily define regions or classify SNPs based on their annotation; all analyses can also be applied to sliding windows. PopGenome offers a wide range of diverse population genetics analyses, including neutrality tests as well as statistics for population differentiation, linkage disequilibrium, and recombination. PopGenome is linked to Hudson’s MS and Ewing’s MSMS programs to assess statistical significance based on coalescent simulations. PopGenome’s integration in R facilitates effortless and reproducible downstream analyses as well as the production of publication-quality graphics. Developers can easily incorporate new analyses methods into the PopGenome framework. PopGenome and R are freely available from CRAN (http://cran.r-project.org/) for all major operating systems under the GNU General Public License.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization.

            Recent evidence in natural and semi-natural settings has revealed a variety of left-right perceptual asymmetries among vertebrates. These include preferential use of the left or right visual hemifield during activities such as searching for food, agonistic responses, or escape from predators in animals as different as fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. There are obvious disadvantages in showing such directional asymmetries because relevant stimuli may be located to the animal's left or right at random; there is no a priori association between the meaning of a stimulus (e.g., its being a predator or a food item) and its being located to the animal's left or right. Moreover, other organisms (e.g., predators) could exploit the predictability of behavior that arises from population-level lateral biases. It might be argued that lateralization of function enhances cognitive capacity and efficiency of the brain, thus counteracting the ecological disadvantages of lateral biases in behavior. However, such an increase in brain efficiency could be obtained by each individual being lateralized without any need to align the direction of the asymmetry in the majority of the individuals of the population. Here we argue that the alignment of the direction of behavioral asymmetries at the population level arises as an "evolutionarily stable strategy" under "social" pressures occurring when individually asymmetrical organisms must coordinate their behavior with the behavior of other asymmetrical organisms of the same or different species.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stick insect genomes reveal natural selection's role in parallel speciation.

              Natural selection can drive the repeated evolution of reproductive isolation, but the genomic basis of parallel speciation remains poorly understood. We analyzed whole-genome divergence between replicate pairs of stick insect populations that are adapted to different host plants and undergoing parallel speciation. We found thousands of modest-sized genomic regions of accentuated divergence between populations, most of which are unique to individual population pairs. We also detected parallel genomic divergence across population pairs involving an excess of coding genes with specific molecular functions. Regions of parallel genomic divergence in nature exhibited exceptional allele frequency changes between hosts in a field transplant experiment. The results advance understanding of biological diversification by providing convergent observational and experimental evidence for selection's role in driving repeatable genomic divergence. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0024-4066
                1095-8312
                May 2018
                April 18 2018
                March 23 2018
                May 2018
                April 18 2018
                March 23 2018
                : 124
                : 1
                : 67-84
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse, Konstanz, Germany
                [2 ]International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Organismal Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
                [3 ]School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [4 ]Radcliffe Institute for Advance Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
                Article
                10.1093/biolinnean/bly024
                663ceb78-28b0-4040-abad-c984b6951501
                © 2018

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article