15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recent evolution of renal replacement therapy in the critically ill patient

      research-article
      1 ,
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The epidemiology of severe acute renal failure has dramatically changed in the past decade. Its leading cause is sepsis and the syndrome develops mostly in the intensive care unit as part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. After the significant improvements obtained from the mid 1970s to the mid 1990s, the past decade has seen a dramatic evolution in technology leading to new machines and new techniques for renal and multiple organ support. Extracorporeal therapies are now performed using adequate treatment doses, which have resulted in improved survival in the general population. At the same time, patients with sepsis seem to benefit from the use of increased doses, as in the case of high-volume hemofiltration or of increased membrane permeability and sorbents as in the case of continuous plasmafiltration adsorption. The humoral theory of sepsis and the peak concentration hypothesis have spurred a significant interest in the use of such extracorporeal therapies for renal support and possibly for the therapy of sepsis. Ongoing research and prospective studies will further elucidate the role of such therapies in this setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial.

          Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration is increasingly used to treat acute renal failure in critically ill patients, but a clear definition of an adequate treatment dose has not been established. We undertook a prospective randomised study of the impact different ultrafiltration doses in continuous renal replacement therapy on survival. We enrolled 425 patients, with a mean age of 61 years, in intensive care who had acute renal failure. Patients were randomly assigned ultrafiltration at 20 mL h(-1) kg(-1) (group 1, n=146), 35 mL h(-1) kg(-1) (group 2, n=139), or 45 mL h(-1) kg(-1) (group 3, n=140). The primary endpoint was survival at 15 days after stopping haemofiltration. We also assessed recovery of renal function and frequency of complications during treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat. Survival in group 1 was significantly lower than in groups 2 (p=0.0007) and 3 (p=0.0013). Survival in groups 2 and 3 did not differ significantly (p=0.87). Adjustment for possible confounding factors did not change the pattern of differences among the groups. Survivors in all groups had lower concentrations of blood urea nitrogen before continuous haemofiltration was started than non-survivors. 95%, 92%, and 90% of survivors in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, had full recovery of renal function. The frequency of complications was similarly low in all groups. Mortality among these critically ill patients was high, but increase in the rate of ultrafiltration improved survival significantly. We recommend that ultrafiltration should be prescribed according to patient's bodyweight and should reach at least 35 mL h(-1) kg(-1).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interpreting the mechanisms of continuous renal replacement therapy in sepsis: the peak concentration hypothesis.

            Severe sepsis and septic shock are the primary causes of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which is the most frequent cause of death in intensive care unit patients. Many water-soluble mediators with pro- and anti-inflammatory action such as TNF, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 play a strategic role in septic syndrome. In intensive care medicine, blocking any one mediator has not led to a measurable outcome improvement in patients with sepsis. CRRT is a continuously acting therapy, which removes in a nonselective way pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators; "the peak concentration hypothesis" is the concept of cutting peaks of soluble mediators through continuous hemofiltration. Furthermore, there is evidence of increased efficacy of high-volume hemofiltration compared to conventional CVVH, and other blood purification techniques that utilize large-pore membranes or sorbent plasmafiltration are conceptually interesting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early isovolaemic haemofiltration in oliguric patients with septic shock.

              To evaluate the effects of early short-term, isovolaemic haemofiltration at 45 ml/kg/h on physiological and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Retrospective study before and after a change of unit protocol (study period 8 years). Intensive care unit of metropolitan hospital. Eighty patients with septic shock. Introduction of a new septic shock protocol based on early isovolaemic haemofiltration (EIHF). In the pre-EIHF period (before), 40 patients received conventional supportive therapy. In the post-EIHF period (after), 40 patients received EIHF at 45 ml/kg/h of plasma-water exchange over 6 h followed by conventional continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH). Anticoagulation policy remained unchanged. The two groups were comparable for age, gender and baseline APACHE II score. Delivered haemofiltration dose was above 85% of prescription in all patients. PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased from 117+/-59 to 240+/-50 in EIHF, while it changed from 125+/-55 to 160+/-50 in the control group (p<0.05). In EIHF patients, mean arterial pressure increased (95+/-10 vs 60+/-12 mmHg; p<0.05), and norepinephrine dose decreased (0.20+/-2 vs 0.02+/-0.2 microg/kg/min; p<0.05). Among EIHF patients, 28 (70%) were successfully weaned from the ventilator compared with 15 (37%) in the control group (p<0.01). Similarly, 28-day survival was 55% compared with 27.5% (p<0.05). Length of stay in the ICU was 9+/-5 days compared with 16+/-4 days (p<0.002). In patients with septic shock, EIHF was associated with improved gas exchange, haemodynamics, greater likelihood of successful weaning and greater 28-day survival compared with conventional therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                2006
                17 February 2006
                : 10
                : 1
                : 123
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nephrology, St Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
                Article
                cc4843
                10.1186/cc4843
                1550862
                16542480
                66495952-45b4-4297-991d-c2d63fcd6ed6
                Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd
                History
                Categories
                Commentary

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article