2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Signet-ring cutaneous metastasis presenting with massive anasarca

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Signet-ring cell carcinomas (SRCC) are poorly-differentiated neoplasms that generally arise from gastrointestinal or breast tissue and are associated with poor prognosis. 1 Malignant signet-ring cells contain abundant cytoplasmic mucin and a peripherally displaced nucleus. Of note, these neoplasms have an unusual tendency to infiltrate surrounding tissues, which is thought to be due to the loss of E-cadherin. 2 This is clearly illustrated by the gastric SRCC variant, known as “linitis plastica,” which can result in the thickening of the stomach wall. 3 Similarly, SRCC can metastasize to the peritoneum, leading to omental caking, a classic radiologic pattern describing the infiltration of omental fat by soft-tissue material (eg, Krukenberg tumors). Dermatologists seldom identify SRCC in practice, most probably due to a combination of their sporadic prevalence and wide-ranging cutaneous manifestations. Here, we report a remarkable case of SRCC presenting with massive anasarca diagnosed solely via skin biopsy. Case report A 63-year-old woman with a history of basal cell carcinoma, hypothyroidism, and tobacco use presented to the emergency department from her nursing home complaining of bilateral lower extremity edema coupled with a rapid decline in overall health. Edema of the lower extremities inexplicably began about 5 months prior to admission. During the interim, she experienced gradual weight loss from her face and upper body, diffused hair loss from the scalp, and significant orthopnea, ultimately requiring her transfer to a skilled nursing facility. While there, she suffered a pulmonary embolism and had several inconclusive workups for her gross deterioration. Aggressive diuresis failed to provide any significant relief from edema, which prompted her hospital admission. On physical examination (Fig 1, A and B), she had a massive indurated edema of the lower body extending to the inframammary area, which stood in stark contrast to the cachectic appearance of the upper extremities, chest, head, and neck. The lower extremity skin was thickened and leathery, with very faint overlying scattered erythema on the pretibial areas alone. No frank nodularity, papules, ulcerations, or violaceous lesions were found. Fig 1 Clinical presentation. A, Indurated edema of bilateral lower extremities. B, Edema extending to the inframammary area with cachexia of upper extremities and thorax. Initial diagnostic workup revealed hemoglobin of 7.9 g/dL, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (89 mm/hr), and elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (18.6 mIU/mL) with depressed free T4 (0.72 ng/dL). A computed tomography scan showed evidence of diffuse body wall edema and skin thickening with hypertrophy and calcification of the proximal lower extremity musculature. These changes were uniformly distributed, although slightly worse in dependent areas (sacrum and proximal thighs). When taken together with hypothyroidism, these imaging findings suggested a diagnosis of Hoffman's syndrome, a rare form of hypothyroid myopathy presenting with muscular pseudohypertrophy. Nevertheless, clinical uncertainty necessitated further evaluation. The dermatology department was consulted and a skin biopsy was performed from the most superior region of the anterior abdominal wall. This location was chosen as it was typical of the edematous changes seen throughout, as well as to avoid the static changes that can occur after lower leg biopsies. On histopathologic examination (Fig 2, A and B), there was tremendous edema with scattered cells having a signet-ring morphology within the deep reticular dermis and subcutis. Lesional cells stained positive with pancytokeratin, CK7, SATB2, and CDX-2, which was suggestive of a non-cutaneous primary malignancy. GATA3, CK20, and neuroendocrine markers, synaptophysin and chromogranin, were negative. Colloidal iron highlighted mucin within atypical cells and no lymphovascular invasion was observed. Collectively, the histopathologic and immunophenotypic findings pointed to a metastatic SRCC of gastrointestinal origin. Fig 2 Histopathology. A, Signet-ring cells. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification: ×200.) B, Tissue stained with CK-7 (colorectal). (Original magnification: ×100.) Subsequently, the patient underwent abdominal ultrasonography, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography. Tumor marker studies were notable for elevated CEA, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CA 125 antigen. Imaging studies, as well as tissue biopsies of colonic and esophageal mucosa, failed to identify a primary SRCC. The patient was transferred to the medical oncology department for further management, with a diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma due to the presence of signet-ring cells. She tolerated inpatient folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin therapy and was referred to a skilled nursing facility with plans for outpatient follow-up. Regrettably, she succumbed to septic shock soon after discharge and no autopsy was performed. Discussion We present a remarkable case where a patient with immense edema of the abdomen and lower extremities was diagnosed with metastatic visceral adenocarcinoma (SRCC) solely via skin biopsy. Physicians must consider several pathophysiologic mechanisms when evaluating skin thickening and lower extremity edema. Iatrogenic culprits include medications (ie, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) or surgical lymph node dissections. Infectious etiologies (eg, lymphatic filariasis) should be ruled out in those with pertinent travel histories. Infiltrative processes, such as amyloidosis, myxedema, or sarcoidosis, present unique challenges when they are not accompanied by classic symptoms (weight gain/loss, fatigue) or other typical features (hair/nail changes, uveitis). These features can prolong arriving at the correct diagnosis, which is worrisome for both patient and physician. Our case determined that SRCC is the infiltrative process responsible for anasarca, which has not yet been reported. In prior literature, cutaneous metastases from SRCC are described as papulonodular, sclerodermoid, or inflammatory-appearing lesions. 4 Illustrative examples of these reactionary patterns include carcinoma en cuirasse and carcinoma erysipeloides, often in the setting of metastatic gastric or breast SRCC. 4 , 5 These distinct morphologies can provide strong clues for the dermatologist but are scarcely observed in common practice. Furthermore, SRCC can mimic benign processes, such as allergic contact dermatitis, 6 or appear as localized, asymptomatic scarring. 7 In addition to obtaining a comprehensive history and performing a full body skin examination, these reports on cutaneous manifestations of SRCC emphasize that the clinician must harbor a high index of suspicion and a low threshold for accepting skin biopsy results to avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment. After a biopsy, gross histopathologic evaluation and targeted immunostaining are essential and will often help in identifying the primary cancer. Painter et al provided a concise review of relevant immunohistochemical markers that dermatologists may encounter. 8 In our case, the presence of signet-ring cells prompted immunostaining for common gastrointestinal malignancies with CK-7/CK-20, SATB2, and CDX-2, in addition to GATA3 for breast and bladder primaries. 6 Negative synaptophysin and chromogranin militated against a neuroendocrine etiology. To summarize, dermatologists should consider a diagnosis of SRCC when faced with a confusing clinical picture that could be explained by an infiltrative process. Moreover, this case underscores the powerful diagnostic utility of a skin biopsy, which provided the only evidence for an internal malignancy in this case. Conflicts of interest Dr Musiek reports the following: Kyowa - advisory board; Helsinn - advisory board; Elorac, Sologenix, miRagen, Connect, Pfizer, and Menlo - investigator. Author Raval and Drs Shmuylovich, Strickley, Chen, and Rosman have no conflicts of interest to report.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge.

          While the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased worldwide in recent decades, the incidence of signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is rising. SRCC has a specific epidemiology and oncogenesis and has two forms: early gastric cancer, which can be resected endoscopically in some cases and which has a better outcome than non-SRCC, and advanced gastric cancer, which is generally thought to have a worse prognosis and lower chemosensitivity than non-SRCC. However, the prognosis of SRCC and its chemosensitivity with specific regimens are still controversial as SRCC is not specifically identified in most studies and its poor prognosis may be due to its more advanced stage. It therefore remains unclear if a specific therapeutic strategy is justified, as the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy and the value of taxane-based chemotherapy are unclear. In this review we analyze recent data on the epidemiology, oncogenesis, prognosis and specific therapeutic strategies in both early and advanced SRCC of the stomach and in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Immunohistochemical characterization of signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach, breast, and colon.

            We studied the immunophenotype of signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the stomach (30 cases), breast (21 cases), and colon (9 cases) with the following expression patterns: (1) breast: consistent, MUC1 (21 [100%]), cytokeratin (CK) 7 (20 [95%]), estrogen receptor (ER; 17 [81%]); infrequent, E-cadherin (6 [29%]), MUC2, MUC5AC, CK20 (1 [5%] each); negative, CDX2 and hepatocyte paraffin 1 (Hep Par 1; 0 [0%] each); (2) gastric: frequent, CDX2 (27 [90%]) and Hep Par 1 (25 [83%]); variable, E-cadherin and CK20 (17 [57%] each), MUC2 and MUC5AC (15 [50%] each), MUC1 (5 [17%]); negative, ER (0 [0%]); and (3) colon: frequent, MUC2 (9 [100%]), CDX2 and MUC5AC (8 [89%] each); infrequent or negative, MUC1 (3 [33%]), Hep Par 1 (2 [22%]), ER (0 [0%]). Immunohistochemical staining distinguished breast from gastric SRCC (ER, MUC1, Hep Par 1, CDX2) and colon SRCC (ER, CDX2, MUC2, and MUC5AC). Gastric and colon SRCCs showed a similar staining pattern for antibodies tested except for Hep Par 1 and CDX2 (gastric, 83% Hep Par 1 positivity and heterogeneous, weak, patchy CDX2 nuclear staining; colon, 22% Hep Par 1 positivity and homogeneous, strong, diffuse CDX2 nuclear staining). About half of the cases of gastric SRCC expressed MUC2 and MUC5AC, whereas virtually all cases of colon SRCC expressed them.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Useful immunohistochemical markers of tumor differentiation.

              Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been somewhat underutilized in the practice of toxicological pathology but can be a valuable tool for the evaluation of rodent neoplasms, both in a diagnostic and an investigational role. Determining an exact tumor type using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of formalin-fixed tissues can be challenging, especially with metastatic and/or poorly differentiated tumors. Successful IHC is dependent on many factors, including species and tissue type, type and duration of fixation, quality fresh or frozen sectioning, and antibody specificity. The initial approach of most tumor diagnosis IHC applications is distinguishing epithelial from mesenchymal differentiation using vimentin and cytokeratin markers, although false-negative and/or false-positive results may occur. Experimentally, IHC can be employed to investigate the earliest changes in transformed tissues, identifying cellular changes not normally visible with H&E. Individual markers for proliferation, apoptosis, and specific tumor proteins can be used to help distinguish hyperplasia from neoplasia and determine specific tumor origin/type. IHC provides a relatively rapid and simple method to better determine the origin of neoplastic tissue or investigate the behavior or progression of a given neoplasm. Several experimental and diagnostic examples will be presented to illustrate the utility of IHC as a supplement to standard staining techniques.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2352-5126
                17 February 2021
                April 2021
                17 February 2021
                : 10
                : 123-125
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
                [b ]Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
                [c ]Department of Pathology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
                Author notes
                []Correspondence to: Amy Musiek, MD, Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4590 Children's Place, Campus Box 8123, St. Louis, MO 63110. amusiek@ 123456wustl.edu
                Article
                S2352-5126(21)00119-3
                10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.02.009
                8042238
                33869701
                664d6b9b-e605-4f37-974f-a88a8d11281d
                © 2021 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Case Report

                anasarca,case report,dermatology,edema,hoffman's syndrome,metastasis,signet-ring cell carcinoma,srcc, signet-ring cell carcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article