8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biometric conversion factors as a unifying platform for comparative assessment of invasive freshwater bivalves

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 4 , 9 , 10 , 2 , 3 , 10 , 2 , 3 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 3 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 12 , 13 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 4 , 28 , 29 , 21 , 21 , 3 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 18 , 19
      Journal of Applied Ecology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: A language and environment for statistical computing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters

            A procedure for determining dry weights has been standardized and applied to a number of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotatoria. In most of the Cladocera, regression equations of the exponential type, relating dry weight to body length, were computed. In the Copepoda, one equation per suborder was computed, and suggestions for future refinements are made. In both groups, a fairly satisfactory agreement was found with literature data where these exist. In both groups, the egg and embryo weight proved to be considerable, relative to the weight of the adult female. In Rotatoria, 4 species could be dealt with in size-classes, and their weight increment per unit length was found to be lower than in the Cladocera and Copepoda. A large number of species were weighed as adults only. A conclusion applicable to the 3 groups is that, as a rule, limnetic species weigh relatively less than littoral, periphytic or benthic species. Even within a species, populations with a more pronounced limnetic way of life weigh less than populations of littoral nature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass.

              Nutrient availability and herbivory control the biomass of primary producer communities to varying degrees across ecosystems. Ecological theory, individual experiments in many different systems, and system-specific quantitative reviews have suggested that (i) bottom-up control is pervasive but top-down control is more influential in aquatic habitats relative to terrestrial systems and (ii) bottom-up and top-down forces are interdependent, with statistical interactions that synergize or dampen relative influences on producer biomass. We used simple dynamic models to review ecological mechanisms that generate independent vs. interactive responses of community-level biomass. We calibrated these mechanistic predictions with the metrics of factorial meta-analysis and tested their prevalence across freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems with a comprehensive meta-analysis of 191 factorial manipulations of herbivores and nutrients. Our analysis showed that producer community biomass increased with fertilization across all systems, although increases were greatest in freshwater habitats. Herbivore removal generally increased producer biomass in both freshwater and marine systems, but effects were inconsistent on land. With the exception of marine temperate rocky reef systems that showed positive synergism of nutrient enrichment and herbivore removal, experimental studies showed limited support for statistical interactions between nutrient and herbivory treatments on producer biomass. Top-down control of herbivores, compensatory behaviour of multiple herbivore guilds, spatial and temporal heterogeneity of interactions, and herbivore-mediated nutrient recycling may lower the probability of consistent interactive effects on producer biomass. Continuing studies should expand the temporal and spatial scales of experiments, particularly in understudied terrestrial systems; broaden factorial designs to manipulate independently multiple producer resources (e.g. nitrogen, phosphorus, light), multiple herbivore taxa or guilds (e.g. vertebrates and invertebrates) and multiple trophic levels; and - in addition to measuring producer biomass - assess the responses of species diversity, community composition and nutrient status.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Applied Ecology
                Journal of Applied Ecology
                Wiley
                0021-8901
                1365-2664
                September 2021
                July 11 2021
                September 2021
                : 58
                : 9
                : 1945-1956
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Biological Earth & Environmental Sciences University College Cork Cork Ireland
                [2 ]School of Biological Sciences Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
                [3 ]Queen's Marine Laboratory Queen's University Belfast Portaferry UK
                [4 ]GEOMAR Helmholtz‐Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel Kiel Germany
                [5 ]MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre Departamento de Paisagem Ambiente e Ordenamento. Universidade de Évora Évora Portugal
                [6 ]Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS—CCT—CONICET Bahía Blanca) , Bahía Blanca Argentina
                [7 ]Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive UMR 5175 CNRS—Université de MontpellierUniversité Paul‐Valéry Montpellier‐Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes—IRD Montpellier France
                [8 ]School of Biology Faculty of Biological Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK
                [9 ]Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WI USA
                [10 ]Department of Zoology and Fisheries Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic
                [11 ]Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal Facultade de Bioloxía Universidade de Vigo Vigo Spain
                [12 ]Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ Buenos Aires Argentina
                [13 ]Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Buenos Aires Argentina
                [14 ]Department of Biology University of North Georgia Oakwood GA USA
                [15 ]School of Natural and Built Environment Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
                [16 ]Institute of Environmental Sciences Faculty of Biology Jagiellonian University Kraków Poland
                [17 ]Hunan Engineering Technology Research Center of Featured Aquatic Resources Utilization College of Animal Science and Technology Hunan Agricultural University Changsha P. R. China
                [18 ]Instituto para el Estudio de la Biodiversidad de Invertebrados (IEBI) Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Universidad Nacional de Salta Salta Argentina
                [19 ]Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Salta Argentina
                [20 ]e‐biom SA Namur Belgium
                [21 ]Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Ecology; Research Unit in Environmental and Evolutionary Biology Institute of Life, Earth and Environment (ILEE) University of Namur Namur Belgium
                [22 ]Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Burlington ON Canada
                [23 ]Faculty of Oceanography and Geography University of Gdańsk Gdańsk Poland
                [24 ]Department of Evolutionary Biology Kazimierz Wielki University Bydgoszcz Poland
                [25 ]Grupo: Reproducción Asistida y Sanidad Animal Facultad de Veterinaria Departamento de Patología Animal Universidad de Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain
                [26 ]CNR ‐ Water Research Institute Verbania Pallanza Italy
                [27 ]Environmental Change Research Centre Department of Geography University College London London UK
                [28 ]Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Champaign IL USA
                [29 ]Department of Zoology Poznań University of Life Sciences Poznań Poland
                [30 ]Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences University of Szczecin Szczecin Poland
                [31 ]Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research University of Windsor Windsor ON Canada
                [32 ]School of Oceanography Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China
                [33 ]Research Center for Eco‐Environmental Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
                [34 ]University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
                Article
                10.1111/1365-2664.13941
                6685d701-6195-484f-a609-4ab3b25d1985
                © 2021

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article