6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of hippocampectomy on seizure freedom in temporal encephaloceles: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) are increasingly recognized as a cause of MRI‐negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The optimal surgical approach for TE‐related refractory epilepsy remains unclear, particularly regarding the necessity of excluding mesiotemporal structures such as the hippocampus, which may lead to worse neuropsychological outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of hippocampectomy on achieving seizure freedom in patients with TE‐related epilepsy through a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis.

          Methods

          A systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science, identifying studies reporting surgical outcomes in TE‐related epilepsy. Studies were included if they provided at least 12 months of follow‐up and reported seizure outcomes using Engel or ILAE classification. The primary outcome was postsurgical seizure freedom (Engel Class IA or ILAE Class 1). A mixed‐effects logistic regression model was used to compare outcomes between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. Heterogeneity was assessed using τ 2 and I 2 statistics.

          Results

          The meta‐analysis included 23 studies with a total of 155 surgically treated patients. The primary analysis did not identify a statistically significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.29–1.52, p = 0.329). Other covariates, including sex, duration of epilepsy, presence of additional epileptogenic lesions, and the use of invasive presurgical evaluation, were not significant predictors of seizure freedom. The I 2 statistic indicated moderate heterogeneity (54.68%).

          Significance

          This IPD meta‐analysis suggests that hippocompectomy does not significantly impact seizure freedom in patients with TE‐related epilepsy and should not be part of a universal approach when determining the optimal surgical strategy. These results reinforce the need for an individualized approach, considering patient‐specific factors to optimize surgical decision‐making in TE‐related epilepsy.

          Plain Language Summary

          Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) can cause drug‐resistant epilepsy, often requiring surgical management for seizure control. Given the variety of surgical techniques available, the optimal approach remains uncertain, particularly regarding the necessity of hippocampectomy, which may impact neuropsychological outcomes. This one‐stage individual participant data meta‐analysis found no significant difference in seizure freedom between patients who underwent hippocampectomy and those who did not. These findings suggest that hippocampectomy should not be routinely performed and highlight the importance of individualized surgical decision‐making for patients with TEs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.

          Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data (IPD) aim to collect, check, and reanalyze individual-level data from all studies addressing a particular research question and are therefore considered a gold standard approach to evidence synthesis. They are likely to be used with increasing frequency as current initiatives to share clinical trial data gain momentum and may be particularly important in reviewing controversial therapeutic areas. To develop PRISMA-IPD as a stand-alone extension to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement, tailored to the specific requirements of reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of IPD. Although developed primarily for reviews of randomized trials, many items will apply in other contexts, including reviews of diagnosis and prognosis. Development of PRISMA-IPD followed the EQUATOR Network framework guidance and used the existing standard PRISMA Statement as a starting point to draft additional relevant material. A web-based survey informed discussion at an international workshop that included researchers, clinicians, methodologists experienced in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of IPD, and journal editors. The statement was drafted and iterative refinements were made by the project, advisory, and development groups. The PRISMA-IPD Development Group reached agreement on the PRISMA-IPD checklist and flow diagram by consensus. Compared with standard PRISMA, the PRISMA-IPD checklist includes 3 new items that address (1) methods of checking the integrity of the IPD (such as pattern of randomization, data consistency, baseline imbalance, and missing data), (2) reporting any important issues that emerge, and (3) exploring variation (such as whether certain types of individual benefit more from the intervention than others). A further additional item was created by reorganization of standard PRISMA items relating to interpreting results. Wording was modified in 23 items to reflect the IPD approach. PRISMA-IPD provides guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of IPD.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool

              Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tsalouch@staff.uni-marburg.de
                Journal
                Epilepsia Open
                Epilepsia Open
                10.1002/(ISSN)2470-9239
                EPI4
                Epilepsia Open
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2470-9239
                10 April 2025
                June 2025
                : 10
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/epi4.v10.3 )
                : 796-808
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Epilepsy Center Hessen, Department of Neurology Philipps University Marburg Marburg Germany
                [ 2 ] Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
                [ 3 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Philipps University Marburg Marburg Germany
                [ 4 ] LOEWE‐Research‐Cluster for Advanced Medical Physics in Imaging and Therapy (ADMIT) TH Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences Giessen Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Panagiota‐Eleni Tsalouchidou, Baldingerstrasse 35043 Marburg, Germany.

                Email: tsalouch@ 123456staff.uni-marburg.de

                Article
                EPI470036 EPI4-0321-2024.R2
                10.1002/epi4.70036
                12163523
                40207440
                6693bddc-e64b-46e4-9f1a-9baa81eac99c
                © 2025 The Author(s). Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 October 2024
                : 20 March 2025
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 13, Words: 7900
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2025
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.7 mode:remove_FC converted:13.06.2025

                epilepsy surgery,hippocampectomy,seizure freedom,temporal encephaloceles,temporal lobe epilepsy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log