17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A resource of potential drug targets and strategic decision‐making for obstructive sleep apnoea pharmacotherapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          There is currently no pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnoea ( OSA) but there is no principled a priori reason why there should not be one. This review identifies a rational decision‐making strategy with the necessary logical underpinnings that any reasonable approach would be expected to navigate to develop a viable pharmacotherapy for OSA. The process first involves phenotyping an individual to quantify and characterize the critical predisposing factor(s) to their OSA pathogenesis and identify, a priori, if the patient is likely to benefit from a pharmacotherapy that targets those factors. We then identify rational strategies to manipulate those critical predisposing factor(s), and the barriers that have to be overcome for success of any OSA pharmacotherapy. A new analysis then identifies candidate drug targets to manipulate the upper airway motor circuitry for OSA pharmacotherapy. The first conclusion is that there are two general pharmacological approaches for OSA treatment that are of the most potential benefit and are practically realistic, one being fairly intuitive but the second perhaps less so. The second conclusion is that after identifying the critical physiological obstacles to OSA pharmacotherapy, there are current therapeutic targets of high interest for future development. The final analysis provides a tabulated resource of ‘druggable’ targets that are relatively restricted to the circuitry controlling the upper airway musculature, with these candidate targets being of high priority for screening and further study. We also emphasize that a pharmacotherapy may not cure OSA per se, but may still be a useful adjunct to improve the effectiveness of, and adherence to, other treatment mainstays.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology

          Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes. Knowledge of the biological role of such shared proteins in one organism can often be transferred to other organisms. The goal of the Gene Ontology Consortium is to produce a dynamic, controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all eukaryotes even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing. To this end, three independent ontologies accessible on the World-Wide Web (http://www.geneontology.org) are being constructed: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets

            The success of mechanism-based drug discovery depends on the definition of the drug target. This definition becomes even more important as we try to link drug response to genetic variation, understand stratified clinical efficacy and safety, rationalize the differences between drugs in the same therapeutic
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defining phenotypic causes of obstructive sleep apnea. Identification of novel therapeutic targets.

              The pathophysiologic causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) likely vary among patients but have not been well characterized. To define carefully the proportion of key anatomic and nonanatomic contributions in a relatively large cohort of patients with OSA and control subjects to identify pathophysiologic targets for future novel therapies for OSA. Seventy-five men and women with and without OSA aged 20-65 years were studied on three separate nights. Initially, the apnea-hypopnea index was determined by polysomnography followed by determination of anatomic (passive critical closing pressure of the upper airway [Pcrit]) and nonanatomic (genioglossus muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and respiratory control stability; loop gain) contributions to OSA. Pathophysiologic traits varied substantially among participants. A total of 36% of patients with OSA had minimal genioglossus muscle responsiveness during sleep, 37% had a low arousal threshold, and 36% had high loop gain. A total of 28% had multiple nonanatomic features. Although overall the upper airway was more collapsible in patients with OSA (Pcrit, 0.3 [-1.5 to 1.9] vs. -6.2 [-12.4 to -3.6] cm H2O; P <0.01), 19% had a relatively noncollapsible upper airway similar to many of the control subjects (Pcrit, -2 to -5 cm H2O). In these patients, loop gain was almost twice as high as patients with a Pcrit greater than -2 cm H2O (-5.9 [-8.8 to -4.5] vs. -3.2 [-4.8 to -2.4] dimensionless; P = 0.01). A three-point scale for weighting the relative contribution of the traits is proposed. It suggests that nonanatomic features play an important role in 56% of patients with OSA. This study confirms that OSA is a heterogeneous disorder. Although Pcrit-anatomy is an important determinant, abnormalities in nonanatomic traits are also present in most patients with OSA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                richard.horner@utoronto.ca
                Journal
                Respirology
                Respirology
                10.1111/(ISSN)1440-1843
                RESP
                Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                1323-7799
                1440-1843
                25 May 2017
                July 2017
                : 22
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/resp.2017.22.issue-5 )
                : 861-873
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 2 ] Department of Physiology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 3 ] Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 4 ] Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Richard L. Horner, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Room 3206, 1 Kings College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada. Email: richard.horner@ 123456utoronto.ca
                [†]

                All authors have contributed equally to this study

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-2548
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-6353
                Article
                RESP13079
                10.1111/resp.13079
                5515492
                28544082
                669e6356-3839-4d3f-b839-0b5fa750ffce
                © 2017 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 08 February 2017
                : 06 April 2017
                : 12 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 11508
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
                Award ID: MT‐15563
                Funded by: National Sanitarium Association Innovative Research Program
                Award ID: 00144051
                Funded by: Tier I Canada Research Chair in Sleep and Respiratory Neurobiology
                Award ID: 950‐229813
                Funded by: Fredrick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship
                Award ID: CGS‐D
                Funded by: CIHR Team Research and Program
                Funded by: Queen Elizabeth II/Grace Lumsden/Margaret Nicholds Scholarship in Science and Technology
                Award ID: QEII‐GSST
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01 HL102321
                Award ID: R01 HL 128658
                Award ID: P01 HL 095491
                Award ID: P01 HL 094307
                Categories
                Invited Review Series: Respiratory Sleep Disorders
                INVITED REVIEW SERIES
                Respiratory Sleep Disorders
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                resp13079
                resp13079-hdr-0001
                July 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.4 mode:remove_FC converted:20.07.2017

                Respiratory medicine
                neurobiology,obstructive sleep apnoea,phenotype,sleep,translational medical research

                Comments

                Comment on this article