25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences between Spectro-Temporal Receptive Fields Derived from Artificial and Natural Stimuli in the Auditory Cortex

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , * , 1 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Spectro-temporal properties of auditory cortex neurons have been extensively studied with artificial sounds but it is still unclear whether they help in understanding neuronal responses to communication sounds. Here, we directly compared spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) obtained from the same neurons using both artificial stimuli (dynamic moving ripples, DMRs) and natural stimuli (conspecific vocalizations) that were matched in terms of spectral content, average power and modulation spectrum. On a population of auditory cortex neurons exhibiting reliable tuning curves when tested with pure tones, significant STRFs were obtained for 62% of the cells with vocalizations and 68% with DMR. However, for many cells with significant vocalization-derived STRFs (STRF voc) and DMR-derived STRFs (STRF dmr), the BF, latency, bandwidth and global STRFs shape differed more than what would be predicted by spiking responses simulated by a linear model based on a non-homogenous Poisson process. Moreover STRF voc predicted neural responses to vocalizations more accurately than STRF dmr predicted neural response to DMRs, despite similar spike-timing reliability for both sets of stimuli. Cortical bursts, which potentially introduce nonlinearities in evoked responses, did not explain the differences between STRF voc and STRF dmr. Altogether, these results suggest that the nonlinearity of auditory cortical responses makes it difficult to predict responses to communication sounds from STRFs computed from artificial stimuli.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system.

          Mammals adapt to a rapidly changing world because of the sophisticated cognitive functions that are supported by the neocortex. The neocortex, which forms almost 80% of the human brain, seems to have arisen from repeated duplication of a stereotypical microcircuit template with subtle specializations for different brain regions and species. The quest to unravel the blueprint of this template started more than a century ago and has revealed an immensely intricate design. The largest obstacle is the daunting variety of inhibitory interneurons that are found in the circuit. This review focuses on the organizing principles that govern the diversity of inhibitory interneurons and their circuits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex.

            Neuroscience produces a vast amount of data from an enormous diversity of neurons. A neuronal classification system is essential to organize such data and the knowledge that is derived from them. Classification depends on the unequivocal identification of the features that distinguish one type of neuron from another. The problems inherent in this are particularly acute when studying cortical interneurons. To tackle this, we convened a representative group of researchers to agree on a set of terms to describe the anatomical, physiological and molecular features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. The resulting terminology might provide a stepping stone towards a future classification of these complex and heterogeneous cells. Consistent adoption will be important for the success of such an initiative, and we also encourage the active involvement of the broader scientific community in the dynamic evolution of this project.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex.

              We investigated the hypothesis that task performance can rapidly and adaptively reshape cortical receptive field properties in accord with specific task demands and salient sensory cues. We recorded neuronal responses in the primary auditory cortex of behaving ferrets that were trained to detect a target tone of any frequency. Cortical plasticity was quantified by measuring focal changes in each cell's spectrotemporal response field (STRF) in a series of passive and active behavioral conditions. STRF measurements were made simultaneously with task performance, providing multiple snapshots of the dynamic STRF during ongoing behavior. Attending to a specific target frequency during the detection task consistently induced localized facilitative changes in STRF shape, which were swift in onset. Such modulatory changes may enhance overall cortical responsiveness to the target tone and increase the likelihood of 'capturing' the attended target during the detection task. Some receptive field changes persisted for hours after the task was over and hence may contribute to long-term sensory memory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                27 November 2012
                : 7
                : 11
                : e50539
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre de Neurosciences Paris-Sud (CNPS), CNRS UMR 8195, Orsay, France
                [2 ]Centre de Neurosciences Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
                University of Salamanca- Institute for Neuroscience of Castille and Leon and Medical School, Spain
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JL CH. Performed the experiments: JME. Analyzed the data: JL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JL CH. Wrote the paper: JL JME CH.

                [¤]

                Current address: LPP, UMR 8158, Equipe Audition, ENS Paris

                Article
                PONE-D-12-07791
                10.1371/journal.pone.0050539
                3507792
                23209771
                66d876c9-b505-4ee7-98bd-90fb9c2b0e54
                Copyright @ 2012

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 March 2012
                : 25 October 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Funding
                This work was supported by grants from the National Research Agency (ANR program Neuro2006) and from the Fédération pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau (FRC) to JME. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Computational Biology
                Computational Neuroscience
                Sensory Systems
                Molecular Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Neurons
                Neuroscience
                Computational Neuroscience
                Sensory Systems
                Neurophysiology
                Central Nervous System
                Sensory Systems
                Auditory System
                Medicine
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Sensory Systems

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article