78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Framework for the Evaluation of Biosecurity, Commercial, Regulatory, and Scientific Impacts of Plant Viruses and Viroids Identified by NGS Technologies

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies and bioinformatics have generated huge new opportunities for discovering and diagnosing plant viruses and viroids. Plant virology has undoubtedly benefited from these new methodologies, but at the same time, faces now substantial bottlenecks, namely the biological characterization of the newly discovered viruses and the analysis of their impact at the biosecurity, commercial, regulatory, and scientific levels. This paper proposes a scaled and progressive scientific framework for efficient biological characterization and risk assessment when a previously known or a new plant virus is detected by next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. Four case studies are also presented to illustrate the need for such a framework, and to discuss the scenarios.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Virus infection improves drought tolerance.

          Viruses are obligate intracellular symbionts. Plant viruses are often discovered and studied as pathogenic parasites that cause diseases in agricultural plants. However, here it is shown that viruses can extend survival of their hosts under conditions of abiotic stress that could benefit hosts if they subsequently recover and reproduce. Various plant species were inoculated with four different RNA viruses, Brome mosaic virus (BMV), Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Tobacco mosaic virus and Tobacco rattle virus. The inoculated plants were stressed by withholding water. The onset of drought symptoms in virus-infected plants was compared with that in the plants that were inoculated with buffer (mock-inoculated plants). Metabolite profiling analysis was conducted and compared between mock-inoculated and virus-infected plants before and after being subjected to drought stress. In all cases, virus infection delayed the appearance of drought symptoms. Beet plants infected with CMV also exhibited significantly improved tolerance to freezing. Metabolite profiling analysis showed an increase in several osmoprotectants and antioxidants in BMV-infected rice and CMV-infected beet plants before and after drought stress. These results indicate that virus infection improves plant tolerance to abiotic stress, which correlates with increased osmoprotectant and antioxidant levels in infected plants.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methods in virus diagnostics: from ELISA to next generation sequencing.

            Despite the seemingly continuous development of newer and ever more elaborate methods for detecting and identifying viruses, very few of these new methods get adopted for routine use in testing laboratories, often despite the many and varied claimed advantages they possess. To understand why the rate of uptake of new technologies is so low, requires a strong understanding of what makes a good routine diagnostic tool to begin. This can be done by looking at the two most successfully established plant virus detection methods: enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) and more recently introduced real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By examining the characteristics of this pair of technologies, it becomes clear that they share many benefits, such as an industry standard format and high levels of repeatability and reproducibility. These combine to make methods that are accessible to testing labs, which are easy to establish and robust in their use, even with new and inexperienced users. Hence, to ensure the establishment of new techniques it is necessary to not only provide benefits not found with ELISA or real-time PCR, but also to provide a platform that is easy to establish and use. In plant virus diagnostics, recent developments can be clustered into three core areas: (1) techniques that can be performed in the field or resource poor locations (e.g., loop-mediated isothermal amplification LAMP); (2) multiplex methods that are able to detect many viruses in a single test (e.g., Luminex bead arrays); and (3) methods suited to virus discovery (e.g., next generation sequencing, NGS). Field based methods are not new, with Lateral Flow Devices (LFDs) for the detection being available for a number of years now. However, the widespread uptake of this technology remains poor. LAMP does offer significant advantages over LFDs, in terms of sensitivity and generic application, but still faces challenges in terms of establishment. It is likely that the main barrier to the uptake of field-based technologies is behavioural influences, rather than specific concerns about the performance of the technologies themselves. To overcome this, a new relationship will need to develop between centralised testing laboratories offering services and those requiring tests; a relationship which is currently in its infancy. Looking further into the future, virus discovery and multiplex methods seem to converge as NGS becomes ever cheaper, easier to perform and can provide high levels of multiplexing without the use of virus specific reagents. So ultimately the key challenge from a routine testing lab perspective will not be one of investment in platforms-which could even be outsourced to commercial sequencing services-but one of having the skills and expertise to analyse the large datasets generated and their subsequent interpretation. In conclusion, only time will tell which of the next-generation of methods currently in development will become the routine diagnostics of the future. This will be determined through a combination of factors. And while the technology itself will have to offer performance advantages over existing methods in order to supplant them, it is likely to be human factors e.g., the behaviours of end users, laboratories and policy makers, the availability of appropriate expertise, that ultimately determine which ones become established. Hence factors cannot be ignored and early engagement with diagnostic stakeholders is essential. Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              New dimensions of the virus world discovered through metagenomics.

              Metagenomic analysis of viruses suggests novel patterns of evolution, changes the existing ideas of the composition of the virus world and reveals novel groups of viruses and virus-like agents. The gene composition of the marine DNA virome is dramatically different from that of known bacteriophages. The virome is dominated by rare genes, many of which might be contained within virus-like entities such as gene transfer agents. Analysis of marine metagenomes thought to consist mostly of bacterial genes revealed a variety of sequences homologous to conserved genes of eukaryotic nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses, resulting in the discovery of diverse members of previously undersampled groups and suggesting the existence of new classes of virus-like agents. Unexpectedly, metagenomics of marine RNA viruses showed that representatives of only one superfamily of eukaryotic viruses, the picorna-like viruses, dominate the RNA virome.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Microbiol
                Front Microbiol
                Front. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-302X
                24 January 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 45
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Plant Pathology Laboratory, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège Gembloux, Belgium
                [2] 2Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), University of Bordeaux, CS20032 UMR 1332 BFP Villenave d'Ornon, France
                [3] 3Plant Biology, Linnean Centre for Plant Biology, Uppsala BioCentre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala, Sweden
                [4] 4Virology and Zoology, Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture Edinbourgh, UK
                [5] 5Department of Plant Virology, Institute of Virology, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Science (SAS) Bratislava, Slovakia
                [6] 6Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [7] 7Virology, Agroscope Nyon, Switzerland
                [8] 8Division Phytomedicine Lentzeallee, Faculty of Life Sciences, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin Berlin, Germany
                [9] 9National Research Council Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection Bari, Italy
                [10] 10Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb Zagreb, Croatia
                [11] 11Management and Production of Renewable Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Helsinki, Finland
                [12] 12Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland
                [13] 13Plant Genetics, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège Gembloux, Belgium
                [14] 14Department of Phytopathology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute Athens, Greece
                [15] 15DLR Rheinpfalz, Institute of Plant Protection, Neustadt an der Weinstrasse Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: David Gilmer, University of Strasbourg, France

                Reviewed by: D'Ann Rochon, Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada, Canada; Marie-Line Iskra-Caruana, CIRAD, France

                *Correspondence: Sebastien Massart sebastien.massart@ 123456ulg.ac.be

                This article was submitted to Virology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

                Article
                10.3389/fmicb.2017.00045
                5258733
                28174561
                66e76d94-ee04-45f4-8ab9-8422a065a94b
                Copyright © 2017 Massart, Candresse, Gil, Lacomme, Predajna, Ravnikar, Reynard, Rumbou, Saldarelli, Škorić, Vainio, Valkonen, Vanderschuren, Varveri and Wetzel.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 November 2016
                : 06 January 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 33, Pages: 7, Words: 4993
                Funding
                Funded by: European Cooperation in Science and Technology 10.13039/501100000921
                Award ID: COST Action FA1407
                Categories
                Microbiology
                Perspective

                Microbiology & Virology
                ngs,pest risk analysis,virus diseases,biological characterization,plant health,regulatory agencies

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log