12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Baseline characteristics of patients with and without hypercoaguable sepsis and the effect of afelimomab on mortality: a post hoc analysis from the MONARCS trial

      abstract
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 5
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central
      21st International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
      20-23 March 2001

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α may modulate clot-promoting and inhibiting pathways, and have potentially important roles in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Purpose 1) To determine if differences in baseline characteristics exist between patients with and without hypercoaguable sepsis, and 2) to explore the effect of afelimomab (an anti-TNFα antibody) on mortality of hypercoaguable and non-hypercoaguable septic patients. Methods A post hoc analysis identified patients with a hypercoaguable state in the overall population enrolled in a large placebo-controlled sepsis trial investigating the safety and efficacy of afelimomab. A hypercoaguable state was defined by (1) platelet count below 140,000 per μl plus (2) D-dimer > 250 ng/ml. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or afelimomab. Results A total of 2634 patients were enrolled, and 1313 (49.8%) had baseline determinations of both platelets and D-dimer. The table describes the baseline characteristics of the two patient groups. Compared to those without laboratory evidence of consumption coagulopathy, patients with a hypercoagulable state had higher organ dysfunction scores, higher interleukin-6 levels and higher frequencies of positive blood cultures. Among the patients with evidence of consumption coagulopathy, 283 were treated with placebo and 311 with afelimomab. Mortality at 28 days was 43.8% vs 38.6% in placebo and afelimomab patients, respectively. In patients not meeting the definition of hypercoaguability, 376 and 343 received placebo and afelimomab; mortality was 35.9% and 26.5%, respectively. Table Absence of Hypercoaguable hypercoaguable state state (n = 594) (n = 719) Mean age (SD) 57.9 (17.0) 60.1 (17.0) Gender (M/F) 58.6% / 41.4% 61.6% / 38.4% Shock 399 (67.2%) 504 (70.1%) MOD score 9.1 6.3 Median interleukin-6 (pg/ml) 1360 908 Mean platelet count × 1000 (SD) 81.7 (35.6) 231.4 (141.7) Positive blood culture (%) 278 (46.8%) 226 (31.4%) G (+) bacteria only (%) 185 (31.1%) 207 (28.8%) G (–) bacteria only (%) 169 (28.5%) 177 (24.6%) Mixed G (+) and G (–) (%) 65 (10.9%) 102 (14.2%) Other or unknown (%) 175 (29.5%) 233 (32.4%) Conclusions Septic patients with evidence of consumption coagulopathy had more organ dysfunction and a higher rate of positive blood cultures. Afelimomab appears to be beneficial in reducing the mortality of septic patients with a hypercoaguable state.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          Crit Care
          Crit Care
          Critical Care
          BioMed Central
          1364-8535
          1466-609X
          2001
          2 March 2001
          : 5
          : Suppl 1
          : P085
          Affiliations
          [1 ]UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
          [2 ]University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
          [3 ]Royal University Hospital, Saaskatoon, Alberta, Canada
          [4 ]University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
          [5 ]Knoll Pharmaceutical Co, Mt Olive, NJ, USA
          Article
          cc1152
          10.1186/cc1152
          3333272
          6703331f-11df-46cf-a517-e88d5cd0b787
          21st International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
          Brussels, Belgium
          20-23 March 2001
          History
          : 15 January 2001
          Categories
          Meeting Abstract

          Emergency medicine & Trauma
          Emergency medicine & Trauma

          Comments

          Comment on this article