9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Enoxaparin Versus Tinzaparin for Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis During Rehabilitation After Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Safety and Efficacy

      , , ,
      PM&R
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To compare the safety and efficacy of 3 low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) treatments (enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, with an alternative LMWH, tinzaparin, 3500 or 4500 units once daily) for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) after acute spinal cord injury (SCI).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          PM&R
          PM&R
          Elsevier BV
          19341482
          January 2012
          January 2012
          : 4
          : 1
          : 11-17
          Article
          10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.10.007
          22269449
          6704ca38-3ae0-4b6e-a92f-2a49911ffcaa
          © 2012

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article